Vaiyākaraṇa-siddhānta-kaumudī — tiṅantapratyayamālāprakaraṇam

॥ अथ तिङन्तप्रत्ययमालाप्रकरणम्‌ ॥

Siddhānta-kaumudī

कण्डूयतेः सन्‌ । सन्यङोः {SK 2395} इति प्रथमस्यैकाचो द्वित्वे प्राप्ते कण्ड्वादेस्तृतीयस्येति वाच्यम्‌ (वा) ॥ कण्डूयियिषति । क्यजन्तात्सन्‌ यथेष्टं नामधातुषु (वा) । आद्यानां त्रयाणामन्यतमस्य द्वित्वमित्यर्थः । अजादेस्त्वाद्येतरस्य । पुपुत्रीयिषति-पुतित्रीयिषति-पुत्रीयियिषति । अशिश्वीयिषति-अश्वीयियिषति । नदराणां संयुक्तानामचः परस्यैव द्वित्वनिषेधः । इन्द्रीयतेः सन्‌ । द्रीशब्दयिशब्दयोरन्यतरस्य द्वित्वम्‌ । इन्दिद्रीयिषति-इन्द्रीयियिषति । चिचन्द्रीयिषति-चन्दिद्रीयिषति-चन्द्रीयियिषति-प्रियमाख्यातुमाचक्षाणं प्रेरयितुं वेच्छति । पिप्रापयिषति-प्रापिपयिषति-प्रापयियिषति । उरुं विवारयिषति-वारिरयिषति-वारयियिषति । बाढं सिसाधयिषतीत्यादिरूपत्रयम्‌ । षत्वं तु नास्ति । 'यङ्सन्ण्यन्तात्सन्‌' । बोभूयिषयिषति । यङ्णिच्सन्नन्ताण्णिच्‌ । बोभूययिषतीत्यादि ।

san after kaṇḍūya- (kaṇḍūyati). When, by "sanyaṅoḥ" (SK 2395), doubling of the first single-vowelled portion (ekāc) obtains: (vārttika) "For kaṇḍū and the rest, [doubling] of the third [ekāc] should be stated." → kaṇḍūyiyiṣati.

san after a kyac-final [base]: (vārttika) "In nāmadhātus (denominal dhātus), as one wishes." The meaning is: doubling of any one of the first three [ekāc portions]; but for one beginning with a vowel (ajādi), of [one of them] other than the first. [From putrīya-:] puputrīyiṣati, putitrīyiṣati, putrīyiyiṣati. [From aśvīya-:] aśiśvīyiṣati, aśvīyiyiṣati.

The prohibition of doubling for n, d and r standing in a conjunct holds only for the one that follows a vowel (ac). san after indrīya- (indrīyati): doubling of either the portion drī or the portion yi: indidrīyiṣati, indrīyiyiṣati. [From candrīya-:] cicandrīyiṣati, candidrīyiṣati, candrīyiyiṣati.

"He wishes to call [someone] dear (priya), or to prompt one who is calling [someone] dear": piprāpayiṣati, prāpipayiṣati, prāpayiyiṣati. [In the same way, with] uru(m) ('wide'): vivārayiṣati, vārirayiṣati, vārayiyiṣati. [With] bāḍha(m) ('firm'): the three forms sisādhayiṣati and so on. But there is no ṣ-substitution (ṣatva) [, because it has been stated that the s (sakāra) must be one that is [itself] a substitute (ādeśa)].

san after [a base] ending in yaṅ, san and ṇi [in that order]: bobhūyiṣayiṣati. ṇic after [a base] ending in yaṅ, ṇic and san: bobhūyayiṣa[ya]ti, and so on.

[Here ends the pratyayamālā.]

Tattvabodhinī

NSP p. 463–464

प्रथमस्येति ॥ अजादेस्तु द्वितीयस्य द्वित्वे प्राप्ते इत्यपि ज्ञेयम् । प्राचा तु ‘यथेष्टं नामधातुषु’ इति प्राप्ते ‘कण्ड्वादेस्तृतीयस्य’ इत्युक्तमित्यवतारितं, तदयुक्तम् । नामधातुत्वस्य निराकृतत्वात् । अत एव मूले नामधातून् समाप्य कण्ड्वादयः पृथगेवोक्ताः ॥—द्रीशब्दयिशब्दयोरिति । नकारस्य लचः परत्वात् द्वित्वं नेति भावः ॥—पिप्रापयिषतीति । णाविष्ठवद्भावेन प्रियशब्दस्य ‘प्रियस्थिर-’ इत्यादिना प्रादेशस्ततो द्वित्वादि ॥—सिसाधयिषतीति । इष्टवद्भावादिह ‘अन्तिकवाढयोः-’ इति साधादेशः । सादिधयिषति ॥—षत्वं तु नास्तीति । आदेशावयवत्वादिति भावः ॥—बोभूयिषयिषतीति । इह यङ्निमित्तद्वित्वे कृतेऽपि सन्निमित्तद्वित्ववारणाय ‘लिटि धातोः-’ इति सूत्रे अनभ्यासस्येत्येतदवश्यं कर्तव्यम् । एवं च ‘लक्ष्ये लक्षणं सकृदेव प्रवर्तते’ इति अनभ्यासग्रहणं तत्र मास्त्विति भाष्यस्थं प्रत्याख्यानं प्रौढिवादमात्रमिति भावः ॥ इति प्रत्ययमाला ॥

translator notes

commentary TB (sk.p60.prose.t1, re-filed from the tail of sk.2678.t1 on 2026-10-05; NSP p. 454), on 'prathamasya': it is also to be understood [that the vārttika applies] when, for a vowel-initial [base], doubling of the second [ekāc] obtains. The predecessor (prāc) introduced 'kaṇḍvādes tṛtīyasya' as [applying] when 'yatheṣṭaṃ nāmadhātuṣu' obtains; TB calls this wrong, since their being nāmadhātus has been refuted — which is why the mūla states kaṇḍū and the rest separately, after finishing the nāmadhātus. Recorded.
commentary TB (sk.p60.prose.t1) on 'drīśabdayiśabdayoḥ': the n is not doubled because it follows a vowel (ac). Followed: the n-d-r sentence is rendered as excluding only the post-vocalic n, so that d is doubled in indidrīyiṣati and candidrīyiṣati.
commentary TB (sk.p60.prose.t1): piprāpayiṣati — by the treatment like iṣṭhan (iṣṭhavadbhāva) before ṇi, priya is replaced by pra by 'priyasthira…' [SK 2016], then doubling and the rest. sisādhayiṣati — by iṣṭhavadbhāva, sādha replaces bāḍha by 'antikabāḍhayoḥ…' [SK 2014]; TB also gives sādidhayiṣati. Recorded: the kaumudī does not state these steps.
commentary TB (sk.p60.prose.t1) on 'ṣatvaṃ tu nāsti': because [the s] is part of a substitute (ādeśāvayava). Followed: it agrees with the sentence the print adds ('ādeśo yaḥ sakāra ity ukteḥ'), supplied in brackets.
commentary TB (sk.p60.prose.t1) on bobhūyiṣayiṣati: to block the doubling occasioned by san after the doubling occasioned by yaṅ has been made, the word 'anabhyāsasya' must be kept in the sūtra 'liṭi dhātoḥ…' [SK 2177]; the Bhāṣya's dismissal of that word there, on the principle 'a rule applies to a target only once' (lakṣye lakṣaṇaṃ sakṛd eva pravartate), is therefore mere bold assertion (prauḍhivāda). Recorded.
textual No BM is printed on the pratyayamālā: BM on SK 2678 closes 'iti kaṇḍvādayaḥ | atha kārakaprakaraṇam' and BM on SK 2679 opens the ātmanepada section. The TB on this passage, formerly filed at the tail of sk.2678.t1 after 'iti kaṇḍvādiprakriyā', is now sk.p60.prose.t1 (re-filed 2026-10-05) and ends 'iti pratyayamālā'.
textual The print (NSP p. 454, scan page-0464 read; heading 'tiṅante pratyayamālā 57') puts the vārttika sign before 'kaṇḍvādes tṛtīyasyeti vācyam' and before 'yatheṣṭaṃ nāmadhātuṣu' only. So 'kyajantāt san' is a heading, parallel to 'kaṇḍūyateḥ san' and 'indrīyateḥ san', as rendered. Our source marks the two vārttikas with '(vā)'.
textual After 'ṣatvaṃ tu nāsti' the print adds 'ādeśo yaḥ sakāra ity ukteḥ' (NSP p. 454, scan); ours lacks it, and it is supplied in square brackets. Where ours reads 'bobhūyayiṣatīty ādi', the print reads 'bobhūyayiṣayatīty ādi', which is the form the heading (ṇic after yaṅ-ṇic-san) requires; the missing 'ya' is supplied in brackets. Ours also lacks the colophon 'iti pratyayamālā ||', supplied in brackets. Mūla matters for the Print Check.
textual The source joins 'candrīyiyiṣati-priyam ākhyātum ācakṣāṇaṃ prerayituṃ vecchati' with a hyphen, as if the gloss continued the candrīya- series. The gloss introduces the priya forms that follow (the print has a daṇḍa there) and is translated so.
translator 'sanyaṅoḥ' (SK 2395) is A 6.1.9, which displaces the 'first ekāc' of 'ekāco dve prathamasya' (A 6.1.1, SK 2175). The n-d-r sentence narrows 'na ndrāḥ saṃyogādayaḥ' (A 6.1.3, SK 2446). The ṣatva that is denied is that of 'ādeśapratyayayoḥ' (A 8.3.59, SK 212).
translator The second-case words (dvitīyānta) 'uruṃ' and 'bāḍhaṃ' take up the construction of the priya gloss ('priyam ākhyātum …'), so they are rendered 'uru(m)', 'bāḍha(m)' with 'in the same way' supplied. vāraya- presupposes uru → vara by 'priyasthira…' (SK 2016), which the text does not state.