This chapter teaches the desiderative: "he wishes to read", "he wishes to eat". Pāṇini forms it with the affix san, which you met in chapter 44 in the root's own sense (jugupsate). Here san adds the sense of wishing. Bhaṭṭoji calls the section the sannanta-prakriyā, "the working of what ends in san". After this chapter you will be able to build pipaṭhiṣati "he wishes to read" from paṭh, step by step. You will know when san takes the augment iṭ and when it does not (bubhūṣati, pipṛcchiṣati, dudyūṣati / dideviṣati). You will know when san is treated as marked with k, so that the root vowel takes no guṇa (rurudiṣati, bibhitsati, didyutiṣate / didyotiṣate). You will lengthen the stem before san (cicīṣati, jighāṃsati), replace iṇ "to go" and iṅ "to study" by gam (jigamiṣati, adhijigāṃsate), and drop the reduplicated syllable in a short list of roots (īpsati, pitsati, ditsati, mokṣate). Last, you will learn which roots keep s after the reduplicated syllable and which take ṣ (tuṣṭūṣati, but sisikṣati, sisvedayiṣati). The chapter has twenty-one sūtras, SK 2608 to SK 2628.
paṭhitum icchati: paṭh + san → paṭh-iṣa (iṭ) → pa-paṭh-iṣa (doubling) → pi-paṭh-iṣa (sanyataḥ) → pipaṭhiṣatiOne sūtra founds the desiderative. SK 2608 adds san after a root when the action of that root is what someone wishes, and the one who wishes is the one who will act. The running example is paṭh "to read". Paṭhitum icchati, "he wishes to read", becomes pipaṭhiṣati.
Rule. The affix san comes optionally, in the sense of wishing (icchā), after a dhātu. Two conditions hold. The dhātu's action must be the object (karman) of the wishing. And it must have the same agent (samānakartṛka) as the wishing. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let the affix san optionally come, in the sense of wishing, after a dhātu that is the object of iṣ 'to wish' and has one and the same agent as iṣ".
The word san is carried forward (anuvṛtti) from guptijkidbhyaḥ san (SK 2393), one of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes. Both commentators say that "object" and "same agent" are measured against the wishing alone, since the sūtra names the wishing.
Bhaṭṭoji adds the key point. This san is prescribed "after a dhātu" (dhātoḥ). So it is ārdhadhātuka, and so it takes iṭ. One of his commentators explains why the word dhātoḥ matters. Only an affix taught with that word is ārdhadhātuka. The san of jugupsate (SK 2393) is not taught so. If it were ārdhadhātuka, its light penultimate would take guṇa.
Example.
paṭhitum icchati, "he wishes to read":
paṭh + san (this rule); n is a marker → paṭh + sa
→ san is ārdhadhātuka and begins with s, a val consonant; it takes iṭ (SK 2184) → paṭh + i + sa
→ s after i becomes ṣ (SK 212) → paṭh-iṣa
→ the form ends in san, so it is doubled (SK 2395) → paṭh paṭhiṣa
→ only the first consonant stays in the abhyāsa (SK 2179) → pa paṭhiṣa
→ a of the abhyāsa becomes i before san (SK 2317, sanyataḥ) → pi paṭhiṣa
→ pipaṭhiṣa ends in san, so it is a dhātu (SK 2304)
→ laṭ, the ending tip, the class-sign śap → pipaṭhiṣa + a + ti
→ a + a gives one a (pararūpa, SK 191) → pipaṭhiṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the sense: "he wishes reading done by himself". The san shows that the reading is what is wished, and that the reader is the one who wishes.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji tests each word of the sūtra.
Example 2: jighatsati. attum icchati, "he wishes to eat". Bhaṭṭoji recalls two rules from earlier chapters.
ad + sa
→ ghas replaces ad before san (SK 2427, luṅsanor ghasḷ) → ghas + sa
→ no iṭ: ghas is a one-vowelled root that refuses it (SK 2246) → ghas + sa
→ the s of ghas becomes t before an ārdhadhātuka in s (SK 2342) → ghat + sa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → ghat ghatsa → the first consonant stays (SK 2179) → gha ghatsa
→ in the abhyāsa gh becomes a palatal (SK 2245) and then unaspirated (SK 2182) → ja ghatsa
→ i for a (SK 2317) → jighatsa → jighatsati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps, with the two changes in the abhyāsa.
Example 3: īrṣyiyiṣati, īrṣyiṣiṣati. From īrṣy "to envy". In chapter 54 you met the vārttika īrṣyates tṛtīyasya, "for īrṣy, [doubling] of the third". Bhaṭṭoji now applies it to san: "there is doubling of yi or of san". Both his commentators match each form to one reading of the vārttika.
īrṣy + i + ṣa → yi is doubled → īrṣ yi yi ṣa → īrṣyiyiṣati.īrṣyi sa sa → i in the abhyāsa → īrṣyi si sa → both s become ṣ (SK 212) → īrṣyiṣiṣati.How the first form should be spelled, scholars discuss this.
Watch out. Two *san*s now stand side by side. The san of SK 2393 (jugupsate) is in the root's own sense and is not ārdhadhātuka. The san of this rule is the desiderative, and it is ārdhadhātuka. A third use, san in the sense of apprehension, comes as a vārttika under SK 2622. Whether a desiderative san can follow another san is settled at the end of the chapter, under SK 2628.
rud + san → rud-iṣa (kit, 2609: no guṇa) → ru-rud-iṣa → rurudiṣati; bhū + sa → bhū-ṣa (kit, 2612) → bubhūṣati; bhid + sa → bibhitsati (2613); optional didyutiṣate / didyotiṣate (2617)Normally san, being ārdhadhātuka, brings guṇa to the root: a light penultimate i, u, ṛ or a final ik vowel is raised. Four sūtras stop this by treating san as kit, "marked with k". An affix that is kit blocks guṇa (SK 2217). SK 2609 makes san kit after six named roots, even with iṭ. SK 2612 and SK 2613 make it kit when it begins with a consonant of the jhal class, after certain roots. SK 2617 makes a san with iṭ optionally kit after another kind of root. SK 2617 comes later in Bhaṭṭoji's order; it is placed here with its kind. The running examples are rurudiṣati "he wishes to weep", bubhūṣati "he wishes to be", and bibhitsati "he wishes to split".
Rule. After rud "to weep", vid "to know", muṣ "to steal", grah "to seize", svap "to sleep" and pracch "to ask", the affix san is kit. So is the affix ktvā, the -tvā of the gerund, taught later. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "after these, san and ktvā are kit".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words. The word ca, "and", gathers in ktvā from the preceding sūtra, mṛḍamṛda… (SK 3323, taught later). The word kit is carried forward from asaṃyogāl liṭ kit (SK 2242).
Example.
rud + san → iṭ (SK 2184) → rud + i + sa → ṣ (SK 212) → rud-iṣa
→ guṇa of the light penultimate u (SK 2189) would give rod-; but san is kit (this rule), so guṇa is blocked (SK 2217) → rud-iṣa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → rud rudiṣa → first consonant only (SK 2179) → ru rudiṣa
→ sanyataḥ changes only an a, so the u stays → rurudiṣa → rurudiṣati.
Likewise vividiṣati "he wishes to know" and mumuṣiṣati "he wishes to steal".
Applies when / blocked by. Why name these six? Bhaṭṭoji's commentators agree on the purpose, root by root.
The san forms of grah, svap and pracch need further rules. They come in group C: jighṛkṣati, suṣupsati (SK 2610) and pipṛcchiṣati (SK 2611).
Which vid is meant, scholars discuss this. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators takes only vid "to know", since it is named beside rud.
Watch out. Here san is kit even though it begins with iṭ. The next two rules need a san that begins with a consonant. This one does not.
Rule. After a dhātu ending in an ik vowel (i, u, ṛ, ḷ), a san that begins with a jhal consonant is kit. A jhal is any non-nasal stop, a sibilant, or h; the s of san is one. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let a san beginning with a jhal be kit after [a dhātu] ending in ik".
The words san and kit are carried forward from SK 2609 and SK 2242. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain "ending in ik". The dhātu is implied by san, and ik qualifies it. So the rule covers a dhātu that ends in ik (tadantavidhi).
Example.
bhū + san → bhū ends in u, an uk vowel, so it takes no iṭ (SK 2610) → bhū + sa
→ san begins with s, a jhal, after an ik-final root → kit (this rule)
→ guṇa of the final ū (SK 2168) is blocked (SK 2217) → bhū-sa → ṣ (SK 212) → bhūṣa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → bhū bhūṣa → the abhyāsa vowel is shortened (SK 2180) → bhu bhūṣa
→ bh becomes b in the abhyāsa (SK 2182) → bubhūṣa → bubhūṣati "he wishes to be".
Example 2: didīṣate. From dīṅ "to waste away". Dātum icchati, "he wishes to waste away".
dī + sa (the form has no iṭ) → kit (this rule): no guṇa → dī-sa → ṣ → dīṣa
→ doubling and shortening → di dīṣa → didīṣa
→ dīṅ is marked with ṅ, so the desiderative takes the ātmanepada, by pūrvavat sanaḥ (SK 2734, taught later) → didīṣate.
Bhaṭṭoji draws a lesson. Dīṅ takes ā for its vowel by SK 2508, but only where an e would stand (the ej-viṣaya). Here san is kit, so no guṇa e can arise. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gloss it so: "guṇa does not obtain, because of kittva". So the ā does not come.
"For this very reason", Bhaṭṭoji adds, SK 2623 names mī apart from mā. His commentators explain. If ā came even outside the domain of e, mī would become mā, and the mention of mā would cover it. The separate mention of mī would then be pointless.
Applies when / blocked by. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives counter-examples.
pipāsati "he wishes to drink" and tiṣṭhāsati "he wishes to stand" end in ā. The rule does not reach them.śiśayiṣate "he wishes to lie down" has iṭ. Its san begins with i, so it is not kit, and śī takes guṇa.Watch out. Iṭ decides kittva. Whenever san takes iṭ, it begins with a vowel, and this rule cannot apply.
Rule. A san beginning with a jhal is also kit after a consonant (hal) that stands near an ik vowel. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let a san beginning with a jhal, that follows a hal standing near an ik, be kit".
The words ik and jhal are carried forward from SK 2612, san from SK 2609, and kit from SK 2242. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain the word anta. Usually it means "end". But a consonant cannot be the end of a vowel. So here anta means "near".
Example.
bhid + san (the form has no iṭ) → bhid + sa
→ d is a hal next to the ik vowel i; san begins with the jhal s → kit (this rule)
→ guṇa of the light penultimate (SK 2189) is blocked → bhid-sa
→ d becomes t before s (SK 121) → bhitsa
→ doubling, first consonant only → bhi bhitsa → bh → b (SK 2182) → bibhitsa → bibhitsati "he wishes to split".
Example 2: jughukṣati. From guh (guhū) "to hide".
guh + sa: guh takes no iṭ before san (SK 2610), though it is an ūdit root → kit (this rule): no guṇa
→ h → ḍh (SK 324) → g takes aspiration, gh (SK 326) → ḍh → k before s (SK 295) → s → ṣ after k (SK 212) → ghukṣa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → ghu ghukṣa → gh → palatal jh (SK 2245) → unaspirated j (SK 2182) → jughukṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji tests the words.
yiyakṣate "he wishes to sacrifice", from yaj. The j stands near a, not an ik, so san is not kit. One of his commentators adds: were it kit, yaj would take saṃprasāraṇa.vivardhiṣate "he wishes to grow", from vṛdh. With iṭ, the san begins with a vowel. It is not kit, and vṛdh takes guṇa.Bhaṭṭoji then says: "the word hal refers to the class (jāti)". It means one or more consonants of the class, not just one. He shows why with tṛṃh (written tṛnhū) "to hurt".
In tṛṃh, the anusvāra and the h both stand between ṛ and san. Taken one by one, neither is "a hal near an ik" with san right after it. Taken as a class, the two together are. Tṛṃh is ūdit, so its iṭ is optional (SK 2279).
Without iṭ: tṛṃh + sa
→ kit (this rule, on the class reading)
→ the penultimate n is lost before a kit affix (SK 415) → tṛh-sa
→ ḍh, k, ṣ (SK 324, 295, 212) → tṛkṣa
→ doubling → tṛ tṛkṣa → a for ṛ in the abhyāsa (SK 2244) → i (SK 2317) → titṛkṣati.
With iṭ: tṛṃh-iṣa → not jhal-initial, so not kit, and the n stays → titṛṃhiṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives this reasoning; the other agrees on the loss of n.
Watch out. The class reading returns under SK 2621, with dambh: dhipsati.
Rule. Take a dhātu that begins with a consonant (halādi), ends in a ral consonant, and has u or i as its penultimate (vyupadha). After it, san and ktvā that take iṭ (seṭ) are optionally kit. Ral is the pratyāhāra of every consonant except y and v. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "u and i are 'vī'. After [a dhātu] that begins with a hal and ends in ral, whose penultimate is one of these, ktvā and san with iṭ are optionally kit".
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give four carried words. Ktvā is gathered by ca from pūṅaḥ ktvā ca (SK 3051). "With iṭ" comes from na ktvā seṭ (SK 3322). "Optionally" comes from nopadhāt thaphāntād vā (SK 3324). Kit comes from SK 2242. The first three are taught later.
Example.
dyut "to shine": dyut + iṣa
→ kit (this rule): no guṇa → dyut-iṣa
→ doubling → dyut dyutiṣa
→ the abhyāsa's y takes saṃprasāraṇa (SK 2344): diut, and i + u gives i → dit dyutiṣa
→ first consonant only (SK 2179) → di dyutiṣa
→ ātmanepada, as for the bare root (SK 2734, taught later) → didyutiṣate.
Not kit: guṇa of the light penultimate (SK 2189) → dyot-iṣa → didyotiṣate.
Likewise ruc "to shine": ruruciṣate / rurociṣate; likh "to write": lilikhiṣati / lilekhiṣati. In each pair the first form has a kit san.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji tests the three conditions.
dideviṣati, from div. Div ends in v, which is not ral. So san is not kit, and guṇa applies.vivartiṣate, from vṛt. Its penultimate is ṛ.eṣiṣiṣati, from iṣ "to wish". One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators derives it. iṣ does not begin with a consonant, so san is not kit. iṣ + iṣa → guṇa → eṣ-iṣa → the second part, ṣis, is doubled (SK 2176) → e ṣi ṣiṣa → eṣiṣiṣati.The other commentator asks why iṭ is a condition. His counter-examples are bhittvā, chittvā and bubhukṣate.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators states the doubt that Bhaṭṭoji answers next, about eṣiṣiṣati. Doubling is nitya: it applies whether or not a rival applies first. If doubling came first, the i of iṣ would no longer be penultimate. Guṇa could never arise, and the word "beginning with a consonant" would do nothing. Bhaṭṭoji's answer: "Here doubling, though nitya, is set aside by guṇa. For an operation on the penultimate (upadhā) is stronger than doubling." His proof (jñāpaka) is that Pāṇini marks the root oṇ with ṛ. That sign, he says, speaks of the whole class of penultimate operations.
One of his commentators sets out the proof. With ṇic and the caṅ-aorist, the ṛ-marking forbids shortening of oṇ's penultimate (SK 2572). That prohibition would be pointless if doubling always came first. So shortening, a penultimate operation, must come before doubling. The same commentator notes that the Bhāṣya's proof speaks only of shortening. Whether it covers guṇa too, scholars discuss this.
Watch out. This option applies only to a san with iṭ. Without iṭ, SK 2612 and SK 2613 decide.
grah + sa (no iṭ, 2610) → gṛh-sa (kit, saṃprasāraṇa) → ḍh, bhaṣbhāva, k, ṣ → jighṛkṣati; div + sa (no iṭ, 2618) → dudyūṣati / with iṭ dideviṣatiBeing ārdhadhātuka, san takes iṭ by SK 2184, unless the root refuses it (SK 2246). Five sūtras adjust this for san. SK 2610 denies iṭ after grah, guh and roots ending in uk. SK 2611 and SK 2626 give iṭ to roots that would not otherwise have it, or would have it only optionally. SK 2618 and SK 2625 make iṭ optional for lists of roots. Bhaṭṭoji teaches SK 2618, SK 2625 and SK 2626 later; they are placed here with their kind. As group B showed, iṭ matters twice over: without it, san begins with a jhal and may be kit. The running examples are jighṛkṣati "he wishes to seize" and the pair dudyūṣati / dideviṣati "he wishes to play".
Rule. Before san, iṭ is not added after grah and guh, nor after a dhātu ending in an uk vowel (u, ṛ, ḷ). Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let iṭ not come to san after grah, after guh, and after [a dhātu] ending in uk".
The words "not" and "iṭ" are carried forward from neḍ vaśi kṛti (SK 2981, taught later). The word ca draws in "ending in uk" from śryukaḥ kiti (SK 2381). Bhaṭṭoji's commentators agree that śri is not drawn in with it. SK 2618 gives śri an option of its own. They also say why the rule is needed: otherwise grah would take iṭ always, and guh, being ūdit, optionally.
Example.
grahītum icchati, "he wishes to seize":
grah + san → no iṭ (this rule) → grah + sa
→ san is kit after grah (SK 2609)
→ r takes saṃprasāraṇa before a kit affix (SK 2412), and ṛ + a gives ṛ → gṛh + sa
→ the s now follows h, an iṇ sound, so ṣ for it (SK 212) is due. But that ṣ is asiddha: treated as not yet made for earlier rules.
→ so the form still ends in h before s: h → ḍh (SK 324) → gṛḍh + sa
→ g takes aspiration before s, since the root now ends in an aspirate (bhaṣbhāva, SK 326) → ghṛḍh + sa
→ ḍh → k before s (SK 295) → ghṛk + sa → s → ṣ after k (SK 212) → ghṛkṣa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → ghṛk ghṛkṣa → first consonant only (SK 2179) → ghṛ ghṛkṣa
→ a for ṛ in the abhyāsa (SK 2244) → i for a (SK 2317) → ghi ghṛkṣa
→ gh → jh (SK 2245) → j (SK 2182) → jighṛkṣa → jighṛkṣati.
Bhaṭṭoji's own reason is "because the ṣ of san is asiddha, there is bhaṣbhāva". Both his commentators say "because the change to k is asiddha" would have been the better wording. How to read his words, scholars discuss this.
Example 2: suṣupsati. From svap "to sleep", without iṭ.
svap + sa → kit (SK 2609) → saṃprasāraṇa of v (SK 2409): sup-sa; no guṇa
→ doubling → sup supsa → first consonant only → su supsa
→ the root's s follows the u of the abhyāsa and becomes ṣ (SK 212) → suṣupsati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps.
Example 3. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives bubhūṣati as the example for "ending in uk". The other adds jughukṣati for guh (worked under SK 2613).
Watch out. The "no iṭ" of this rule feeds SK 2612. Bhū has no iṭ, so its san begins with s and is kit.
Rule. After five tudādi roots, san takes iṭ. The five are kṝ "to scatter", gṝ "to swallow", dṛṅ "to respect", dhṛṅ "to stay" and pracch "to ask". Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let iṭ come to san after these: kṝ, gṝ, dṛṅ, dhṛṅ, pracch".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words. "Iṭ" comes from iḍ atyartivyayatīnām (SK 2384). "Before san" comes from SK 2626, taught later in this chapter. He also gives the purpose. For kṝ and gṝ, SK 2625 would make iṭ optional. For the others, SK 2246 would deny it. This rule overrides both.
Example.
praṣṭum icchati, "he wishes to ask":
pracch + san → iṭ (this rule) → pracch + i + sa → ṣ → pracch-iṣa
→ san is kit after pracch (SK 2609), so r takes saṃprasāraṇa (SK 2412) → pṛcch-iṣa
→ doubling → first consonant only → pṛ pṛcchiṣa → a for ṛ (SK 2244) → i (SK 2317) → pipṛcchiṣati.
kṝ: kṝ + i + ṣa → san with iṭ is not kit, so guṇa of the final ṝ (SK 2168), with r after it → kar-iṣa
→ doubling → ka kariṣa → i (SK 2317) → k → c (SK 2245) → cikariṣati.
gṝ: jigariṣati; and with l for r, optional before a vowel by aci vibhāṣā (SK 2541), jigaliṣati.
Vārttika: atreṭo dīrgho neṣṭaḥ. "Here the lengthening of iṭ is not wanted." After a root in ṝ, SK 2391 would make iṭ optionally long, which would give an unwanted long ī in cikariṣati. This statement forbids it here. Bhaṭṭoji sets it apart as a vārttika. Where it comes from, scholars discuss this.
dṛṅ and dhṛṅ: didariṣate, didhariṣate. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators says they take the ātmanepada by pūrvavat sanaḥ (SK 2734), since the roots are marked with ṅ.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji raises a doubt. How then is uddidhīrṣuḥ "wishing to hold up" correct, with no iṭ? His answer: "Take it as from dhṛṅ and dhṛñ of the bhvādi class." The tudādi dhṛṅ is in this rule; the bhvādi roots are not. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators agree that the lengthening then comes from SK 2614. One of them gives the steps:
dhṛ + sa (no iṭ) → long vowel before a jhal-initial san (SK 2614) → dhṝ-sa
→ i for ṝ, with r after it (SK 2390) → dhir-sa → i lengthened before a consonant (SK 354) → dhīr-sa → ṣ → dhīrṣa
→ doubling, short vowel, dh → d → didhīrṣa → with ud and the affix u (taught later) → uddidhīrṣuḥ.
Watch out. The rule speaks of the tudādi roots only. The same sounds in another class need not take iṭ.
Rule. Before san, iṭ is optional after these: roots ending in iv; ṛdh "to prosper"; bhrasj; dambh; śri; svṛ; yu; ūrṇu; bhṛ (bhara); jñapi; and the root san. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let iṭ optionally come to san after [roots] ending in iv, and after ṛdh and the rest".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words. "Optionally" comes from svaratisūti… (SK 2279). "Iṭ" comes from iṇ niṣṭhāyām (SK 3045, taught later).
Example.
devitum icchati, "he wishes to play", without iṭ:
div + sa → v is a hal next to the ik vowel i; san begins with a jhal → kit (SK 2613)
→ v is replaced by ūṭh, that is ū (SK 2561) → di ū sa
→ y for i before a vowel (yaṇ, SK 47) → dyū sa → ṣ → dyūṣa
→ doubling (SK 2395) → dyū dyūṣa → first consonant only (SK 2179) → short vowel (SK 2180) → du dyūṣa → dudyūṣati.
With iṭ: div + iṣa → the san does not begin with a jhal, so it is not kit; no ūṭh
→ guṇa of the light penultimate (SK 2189) → dev-iṣa → doubling, short vowel → dideviṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explains the second form so.
siv "to sew": susyūṣati / siseviṣati. Here the s after the abhyāsa stays s. Bhaṭṭoji cites the restriction stautiṇyor eva… (SK 2627), to be stated: only stu and a ṇi-final stem take that ṣ.
The other roots of the list. Bhaṭṭoji works most of them under SK 2620 and SK 2621. Each comes in two forms: without iṭ and with it.
īrtsati / ardidhiṣati; bibhrakṣati, bibharkṣati / bibhrajjiṣati, bibharjiṣati (under SK 2620).dhipsati, dhīpsati / didambhiṣati (under SK 2621).jñīpsati / jijñapayiṣati (under SK 2621).The rest are worked here.
śri: without iṭ, śri + sa
→ long vowel (SK 2614)
→ śrī-sa
→ kit (SK 2612): no guṇa
→ śrīṣa
→ doubling, first consonant, short vowel
→ śiśrīṣati.
With iṭ: no lengthening and no kittva. The doubling sees the original śri (SK 2243)
→ śi śri-iṣa
→ guṇa and ay in the second part (SK 61)
→ śiśrayiṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes the lengthening and the kittva in the first form, and their absence in the second.
svṛ: without iṭ, svṛ + sa
→ long ṝ (SK 2614)
→ kit (SK 2612)
→ u for ṝ after the labial v, with r (SK 2494)
→ svur-sa
→ u lengthened (SK 2265)
→ svūrṣa
→ doubling
→ su svūrṣa
→ susvūrṣati.
With iṭ: svṛ doubled
→ a for ṛ in the abhyāsa (SK 2244)
→ i (SK 2317)
→ si
→ guṇa in the second part
→ sisvariṣati.
yu: without iṭ, yu + sa → long vowel (SK 2614) → kit → yūṣa → yuyūṣati.
With iṭ: guṇa is held back while doubling is due (SK 2243)
→ yu yu-iṣa
→ guṇa and av in the second part
→ yu yav-iṣa
→ the abhyāsa u becomes i before y + a (SK 2577)
→ yiyaviṣati.
ūrṇu: without iṭ, ūrṇu + sa
→ long vowel (SK 2614)
→ kit (SK 2612): no guṇa
→ the root begins with a vowel, so its second part, nū with the s, is doubled; r is not doubled (SK 2446)
→ short vowel in the abhyāsa
→ ūrṇunūṣati.
With iṭ, san is optionally ṅit by vibhāṣorṇoḥ (SK 2447). One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explains both results.
ūrṇunuviṣati.ūrṇunaviṣati.Why the abhyāsa of ūrṇunaviṣati shows u. Bhaṭṭoji meets an objection. Guṇa and av, being later rules (para), would apply first. Then nav would be doubled, its a would become i, and no u would be heard. He answers: when doubling is to be done, dvirvacane 'ci (SK 2243) works in one of two ways. Either the substitute takes on the original's form (sthānirūpātideśa), or the substitute is not made at all (ādeśaniṣedha). One of his commentators explains: on either reading, nu is what gets doubled. So u is heard in the abhyāsa.
A second objection follows. SK 2243 works only when a vowel causing the doubling follows. Here that vowel is the i of san. But the whole sannanta undergoes doubling. Can a thing that undergoes an operation (kāryin) also be its cause (nimitta)? Bhaṭṭoji answers with a maxim (paribhāṣā): "it is only while undergoing an operation that the undergoer is not taken as its cause". "And here," he adds, "san does not undergo the doubling." Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gloss: it is nu that is doubled.
bhṛ: without iṭ, bhṛ + sa
→ long ṝ (SK 2614)
→ kit
→ u with r after the labial bh (SK 2494)
→ lengthened (SK 354)
→ bhūrṣa
→ doubling, short vowel, and bh becomes b (SK 2182)
→ bubhūrṣati.
With iṭ: doubling, a for ṛ in the abhyāsa, i → guṇa in the second part → bibhariṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps.
The root san: without iṭ, san + sa
→ ā for the n before a jhal-initial san (janasana…, SK 2504)
→ sā-sa
→ doubling, short vowel, i
→ si sāsa
→ the s after the abhyāsa's i becomes ṣ (SK 212)
→ siṣāsati.
With iṭ: no ā, since san does not begin with a jhal → sisaniṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explains the s in each. In siṣāsati the san has not become ṣ (it follows ā), so SK 2627 does not apply, and the ṣ stands. In sisaniṣati the san has become ṣ, so SK 2627 keeps the s.
Vārttika under SK 2621: tanipatidaridrātibhyaḥ sano vā iḍ vācyaḥ. "It should be stated that san optionally takes iṭ after tan, pat and daridrā." One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators calls it an option where iṭ would otherwise apply. Its forms come later: titaniṣati (SK 2622), pipatiṣati (SK 2622), and didaridriṣati / didaridrāsati (SK 2623).
Watch out. Each root in the list has two desideratives, and they differ in more than iṭ. Without iṭ, san is usually kit, and lengthening (SK 2614) may apply. With iṭ, san is not kit, so guṇa usually applies, and there is no lengthening.
Rule. After vṛṅ and vṛñ, and after a root ending in ṝ, san optionally takes iṭ. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let san optionally take iṭ after vṛṅ and vṛñ and after [a root] ending in ṝ".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried word: "after vṛ and ṝ" from vṝto vā (SK 2391). He calls the rule an exception (apavāda) to SK 2610. Both commentators add a limit. The word "in upadeśa" is carried forward from SK 2246. So the root must end in ṝ as first taught.
Example.
tṝ:
with iṭ: tṝ + iṣa
→ not kit
→ guṇa with r
→ tar-iṣa
→ doubling
→ ta tariṣa
→ i (SK 2317)
→ titariṣati;
with iṭ made long by SK 2391 → titarīṣati;
without iṭ: tṝ + sa
→ kit (SK 2612): no guṇa
→ i for ṝ, with r (SK 2390)
→ tir-sa
→ lengthened (SK 354)
→ tīrṣa
→ doubling, short vowel
→ titīrṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps.
vṛñ: vivariṣati, vivarīṣati, and without iṭ vuvūrṣati (u by SK 2494 after the labial v).
vṛṅ: vuvūrṣate, vivariṣate; the ātmanepada comes because the root is marked with ṅ.
Applies when / blocked by. In cikīrṣati "he wishes to do", from kṛ, the ṝ is made by SK 2614. It was not there in upadeśa, so this rule does not apply. For the same reason, one of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators says, Bhaṭṭoji gives dudhvūrṣati without iṭ. Dhvṛ "to be crooked" ends in short ṛ in upadeśa.
dhvṛ + sa
→ long ṝ (SK 2614)
→ u with r (SK 2494)
→ lengthened (SK 354)
→ doubling
→ dudhvūrṣati.
Watch out. Vṛ and the ṝ-final roots end in uk. Without this rule, SK 2610 would deny them iṭ outright.
Rule. San takes iṭ after smi "to smile", pūṅ, ṛ, añjū "to anoint" and aś "to pervade". Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let san take iṭ after smi, pūṅ, ṛ, añjū, aś". "Iṭ" is carried forward from SK 2384.
Example.
smi: smi + iṣa
→ guṇa held back while doubling is due (SK 2243)
→ smi smi-iṣa
→ first consonant only
→ si smi-iṣa
→ guṇa and ay in the second part → sismayiṣa → sismayiṣate.
The s after the abhyāsa stays s, by SK 2627. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes that smiṅ would otherwise take no iṭ.
pūṅ: pū doubled (SK 2243)
→ short vowel
→ guṇa and av in the second part
→ pu pav-iṣa
→ the abhyāsa u becomes i before p + a (SK 2577)
→ pipaviṣate.
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators note that pūñ, the root with ñ, is not named. It gives pupūṣati, with no iṭ by SK 2610.
ṛ: ṛ + iṣa
→ guṇa, with r
→ ar-iṣa
→ the root begins with a vowel, so the second part, ris, is doubled (SK 2176)
→ a ris risa
→ first consonant only
→ a ri riṣa
→ aririṣati.
Why guṇa comes first in aririṣati. Bhaṭṭoji says: "here ris is doubled". Does SK 2243 not hold guṇa back? No. "Since is, a part of the san, shares in the operation (kāryabhāk), and since what undergoes an operation cannot be its cause, dvirvacane 'ci does not apply." One of his commentators explains: through its part is, the whole isa undergoes the doubling. So it cannot be the vowel that causes the doubling.
añjū: añj + iṣa → the n is not doubled (SK 2446), so jis is doubled → añjijiṣati.
aś: aś + iṣa → śis doubled → aśiśiṣate.
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators note that both roots are ūdit, so iṭ would otherwise be optional (SK 2279). Here it is obligatory. Aś "to eat" of the kryādi class takes iṭ in any case.
Further forms Bhaṭṭoji gives here.
prāṇiṇiṣati "he wishes to breathe", from pra + an. By ubhau sābhyāsasya (SK 2606), the n becomes ṇ in both the abhyāsa and the second part.
ucicchiṣati, from ucch (ucchī):
→ the augment tuk (t) before ch (SK 146, che ca) → the t becomes c (SK 111) → ucch + iṣa
→ the second part, cchis, is doubled with its c and ch
→ only the first consonant stays in the abhyāsa (SK 2179) → u ci cchiṣa → ucicchiṣati.
Why is c, not t, doubled? Bhaṭṭoji cites the statement pūrvatrāsiddhīyam advirvacane: for doubling, the later rule's result is not treated as unmade. So the c made by SK 111 counts at the doubling.
A second doubt follows. In the abhyāsa, the ch is lost. The tuk was there only because of ch. Should its c not vanish too? Bhaṭṭoji answers that the maxim nimittāpāye naimittikasyāpy apāyaḥ, "when the cause goes, what it caused goes too", is not binding (anitya). He gives two signs (jñāpaka). One is SK 2561, which names ch together with its tuk. The other is the statement that prescribes restoring a base (prakṛtipratyāpatti). One of his commentators explains both. Each statement would be useless if the maxim always held.
The remaining forms of this kaumudī are san after ṇi-final stems. They are set out in group G, beside the rules on ṣ that they feed.
Watch out. Smi, ṛ and the rest would not take iṭ, or would take it only optionally. This rule makes it obligatory. So none of these *san*s is kit, and guṇa applies wherever the root has an i, u or ṛ (sismayiṣate, pipaviṣate, aririṣati).
ci + sa → cī-sa (2614) → ci-cī-ṣa → cicīṣati / cikīṣati; han + sa → hān-sa → jighāṃsati; tan + sa → titāṃsati / titaṃsatiBefore a san without iṭ, some stems lengthen a vowel. SK 2614 lengthens a final vowel, and the penultimate a of han "to kill" and of a certain gam. SK 2622 makes the same lengthening optional for tan "to stretch". Bhaṭṭoji teaches SK 2622 later; it is placed here with SK 2614. The running examples are cicīṣati "he wishes to gather", jighāṃsati "he wishes to kill", and titāṃsati / titaṃsati "he wishes to stretch".
Rule. Before a san beginning with a jhal, a long vowel replaces the final of a stem (aṅga) ending in a vowel (ac). It also replaces the penultimate of han, and of gam when gam is a substitute for a vowel-root (ajādeśa). Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let there be a long vowel for [stems] ending in ac, for han, and for gam that is a substitute for an ac, before a san beginning with a jhal".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words.
The words "beginning with a jhal" are not carried from any sūtra. The same commentator traces them to the Bhāṣya on cchvoḥ… (SK 2561), which says "we shall qualify san by jhal".
Example.
cetum icchati, "he wishes to gather":
ci + sa (no iṭ) → the stem ends in a vowel; san begins with a jhal → long vowel (this rule) → cī-sa
→ kit (SK 2612): no guṇa → ṣ (SK 212) → cīṣa
→ doubling, short vowel in the abhyāsa → ci cīṣa
→ optionally a velar for the c after the abhyāsa, by vibhāṣā ceḥ (SK 2525) → cicīṣati / cikīṣati.
ji "to conquer": jī-sa
→ doubling
→ ji jīṣa
→ a velar for j after the abhyāsa, by sanliṭor jeḥ (SK 2331)
→ jigīṣati.
Bhaṭṭoji recalls both rules here.
hantum icchati, "he wishes to kill":
han + sa (no iṭ) → the penultimate a is lengthened (this rule) → hān-sa
→ doubling → hān hānsa → first consonant only, short vowel (SK 2179, 2180) → ha hānsa → i (SK 2317) → hi hānsa
→ h → jh (SK 2245) → j (SK 2182) → ji hānsa
→ gh for the h after the abhyāsa (abhyāsāc ca, SK 2430) → ji ghānsa
→ n → anusvāra before s (SK 123) → jighāṃsati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps. He adds that the a is lengthened, not the n. The word "long" calls up "a vowel" by itself.
Applies when / blocked by. Gam here means only the gam that replaces a vowel-root. SK 2615 and SK 2616 put it in place of iṇ and iṅ, and a vārttika in place of ik. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators agree on this. One says the Bhāṣya makes it clear. The other draws it from the wording: the word ac in the sūtra is not needed for the stems, so it is split off to qualify gam.
So gamḷ "to go", the ordinary root, is not lengthened: jigaṃsyate, saṃjigaṃsate (see SK 2615). One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators also gives a counter-example to "jhal-initial": jigamiṣati, where iṭ comes by SK 2401.
Watch out. The lengthening needs a san without iṭ. With iṭ, the san begins with i, and there is no long vowel: compare śiśrīṣati and śiśrayiṣati (SK 2618).
Rule. The penultimate of tan is optionally lengthened before a san beginning with a jhal. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let the penultimate of this [root] optionally be lengthened before a san beginning with a jhal". One of his commentators gives the carried words: "penultimate" from SK 370, "long" from SK 174, and "before a jhal-initial san" from SK 2614.
Example.
tan + sa (no iṭ, by the option of the vārttika under SK 2621)
→ long penultimate (this rule) → tān-sa → anusvāra (SK 123) → tāṃsa
→ doubling → ta tāṃsa → i (SK 2317) → titāṃsati.
Without the lengthening → titaṃsati.
With iṭ, by that vārttika → titaniṣati.
Vārttika: āśaṅkāyāṃ san vaktavyaḥ. "San should be stated in the sense of apprehension (āśaṅkā)." One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explains. This san comes in its own sense (svārthe), after a root whose action is feared to be about to happen. Bhaṭṭoji's examples:
śvā mumūrṣati, "the dog is about to die". mṛ + sa → long ṝ (SK 2614) → kit (SK 2612) → u with r after the labial m (SK 2494) → lengthened (SK 354) → mūrṣa → doubling, short vowel → mumūrṣati.kūlaṃ pipatiṣati, "the bank is about to fall". This is the iṭ form of pat, by the vārttika under SK 2621.The same commentator glosses the first as "it is one whose death is apprehended". How to analyse the sense, scholars discuss this.
Watch out. The dog does not wish anything. This san is not the desiderative of SK 2608, though its forms look the same.
iṇ + san → gam + iṣa (gamer iṭ) → jigamiṣati; passive gam + sa (no iṭ before taṅ) → gām-sa (2614) → jigāṃsyateIn chapter 54, SK 2607 put gam in place of iṇ "to go" before ṇi. Two sūtras now do the same before san. SK 2615 does it for iṇ, except in the sense of making known. SK 2616 does it for iṅ "to study". A vārttika adds ik "to remember". The running example is jigamiṣati "he wishes to go". In the passive, the same root gives jigāṃsyate "it is wished to be gone to".
Rule. Before san, gam replaces iṇ, but not in the sense of making known (bodhana). Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let gam (gami) replace iṇ before san, but not in the sense of making known". One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words. "Of iṇ" comes from iṇo gā luṅi (SK 2458). "Gam, except in making known" comes from ṇau gamir abodhane (SK 2607). The other confirms that "except in making known" comes from SK 2607.
Example.
iṇ + san → gam replaces i (this rule) → gam + sa
→ iṭ by gamer iṭ parasmaipadeṣu (SK 2401) → gam-iṣa
→ the san begins with i, not a jhal, so SK 2614 does not lengthen
→ doubling → ga gamiṣa → i (SK 2317) → g → j (SK 2245) → jigamiṣati.
Applies when / blocked by. In the sense of making known, there is no gam: pratīṣiṣati, "he wishes to make known". One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the steps.
prati + i + sa → the root begins with a vowel, so the second part, sa, is doubled (SK 2176) → i sa sa
→ the abhyāsa takes i (SK 2317) → i si sa
→ i of prati + i → long ī (SK 85) → both s become ṣ → pratīṣiṣati.
Whether the abhyāsa should take i here, scholars discuss this; one commentator holds that it does.
Vārttika: iṇvad ikaḥ. "Ik is like iṇ." One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators says it is stated for ik "to remember". So ik too takes gam before san: adhijigamiṣati, "he wishes to remember".
The passive. Bhaṭṭoji adds the passive (karmaṇi). There the endings are the ātmanepada ones (taṅ), by bhāvakarmaṇoḥ (SK 2679, taught later). Gamer iṭ speaks only of parasmaipada endings. So now there is no iṭ.
iṇ + san, passive → gam + sa (no iṭ) → jhal-initial, so long penultimate (SK 2614) → gām-sa → anusvāra → gāṃsa
→ doubling → ga gāṃsa → i, j → jigāṃsa
→ the passive sign yak (SK 2756, taught later) with te → jigāṃsyate, "it is wished to be gone to".
From ik: adhijigāṃsyate, "it is wished to be remembered". One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives both glosses.
The ordinary root gamḷ is not a substitute for a vowel-root. So, Bhaṭṭoji says, it is not lengthened: jigaṃsyate; and with sam, saṃjigaṃsate. One of his commentators says the ātmanepada of saṃjigaṃsate comes by samo gamyṛcchibhyām through SK 2734.
Watch out. Iṭ depends on the endings. Active jigamiṣati has iṭ and a short a. Passive jigāṃsyate has no iṭ and a long ā.
Rule. Gam also replaces iṅ "to study" before san. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let gam replace iṅ before san". One of his commentators says "gam" is carried forward from SK 2607 and "before san" from SK 2615.
Example.
adhi + iṅ + san → gam (this rule) → adhi gam + sa
→ iṅ is marked with ṅ, so the desiderative takes the ātmanepada (SK 2734)
→ gamer iṭ holds only before parasmaipada endings, so no iṭ
→ jhal-initial san: long penultimate (SK 2614) → gāṃsa → doubling → jigāṃsa → adhijigāṃsate, "he wishes to study".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps; Bhaṭṭoji gives only the form.
Watch out. With a ṇi between root and san, iṅ may instead take gāṅ. That form, adhijigāpayiṣati, is set out in group G.
āptum icchati: āp + sa → īp-sa (ī, 2619) → ī-psa-psa (psa doubled) → ī-psa (abhyāsa dropped, 2620) → īpsati; pat + sa → pist-sa (is, 2623) → abhyāsa dropped → s lost by skoḥ → pitsatiFive sūtras give a few roots a new vowel before a san that begins with s. SK 2619 puts ī in āp, jñap and ṛdh. SK 2621 puts i or ī in dambh. SK 2623 puts is in mī, mā, the ghu roots and five more. SK 2624 gives guṇa to intransitive muc. And SK 2620 deletes the abhyāsa wherever these four have applied. In Pāṇini's order the block runs SK 2623, 2619, 2621, 2624, 2620. Bhaṭṭoji scatters it, so several of these rules carry words from SK 2623, which he teaches later. The running examples are īpsati "he wishes to obtain" and pitsati "he wishes to fall".
Rule. Ī replaces the vowel of āp "to obtain", jñap and ṛdh "to prosper", before a san beginning with s. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let ī be substituted for the ac of these before a san beginning with s".
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give the carried words. "Of the vowel" (acaḥ) comes from sani mīmā… (SK 2623); both commentators say so. One of them adds that "before san" comes from it too. That sūtra stands just before this one in Pāṇini's order. "S" comes from saḥ sy ārdhadhātuke (SK 2342). It qualifies san, so the rule means a san that begins with s.
Example. The forms come under the next two sūtras: īpsati, īrtsati (SK 2620) and jñīpsati (SK 2621).
With iṭ, the san begins with i, not s, so there is no ī: ardidhiṣati (SK 2620).
Watch out. "Beginning with s" in effect means "without iṭ". The option of SK 2618 decides which form you get for ṛdh and jñap.
Rule. "Here" the abhyāsa is deleted (lopa). "Here" means wherever SK 2623, 2619, 2621 or 2624 has applied. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "wherever [an operation] is stated from sani mīmā… onwards, let there be deletion of the abhyāsa". One of his commentators explains: once the operation of those four rules has been carried out.
Example.
āptum icchati, "he wishes to obtain":
āp + sa (no iṭ) → ī for ā (SK 2619) → īp-sa
→ the root begins with a vowel, so the second part, psa, is doubled (SK 2176) → ī psa psa
→ the abhyāsa is deleted (this rule) → ī psa → īpsati.
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give the doubling of psa.
ardhitum icchati, "he wishes to prosper", without iṭ:
ṛdh + sa → ī for ṛ (SK 2619), with r after it (raparatva, SK 70) → īrdh-sa
→ dh → t before s (cartva, SK 121) → īrt-sa
→ r is not doubled (SK 2446), so tsa is doubled → īr tsa tsa
→ the abhyāsa is deleted (this rule) → īrtsati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators adds why t, not dh, is doubled. The statement pūrvatrāsiddhīyam advirvacane lets the doubling see the result of cartva.
With iṭ (SK 2618): no ī, since the san does not begin with s
→ guṇa with r → ardh-iṣa → dhis is doubled → ar dhi dhiṣa → dh → d in the abhyāsa → ardidhiṣati.
bhrasj gives four forms. The iṭ option of SK 2618 combines with the optional augment ram of SK 2535. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators sets them out.
bhrajj-iṣa → bibhrajjiṣati. There is no saṃprasāraṇa (SK 2412), since this san is not kit.bharj-iṣa → bibharjiṣati.bibhrakṣati.bibharkṣati.These four have no deleted abhyāsa. Bhrasj is not among the four rules.
Watch out. The abhyāsa goes only where one of the four rules has acted. In ardidhiṣati SK 2619 did not act, so the abhyāsa stays.
Rule. I, and by the word ca also ī, replaces the vowel of dambh before a san beginning with s. Then the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620). Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let i, and also ī, be substituted for the ac of dambh before a san beginning with s". One of his commentators gives the carried words: "before san" and "of the vowel" from SK 2623, ī from SK 2619, and s from SK 2342.
Example.
dambh + sa (no iṭ, SK 2618) → i for a (this rule) → dimbh-sa
→ is the san kit? The anusvāra and the bh stand between the i and the san. Bhaṭṭoji recalls that hal in SK 2613 means the class. So the san is kit (SK 2613)
→ the penultimate n is lost before a kit affix (SK 415) → dibh-sa
→ doubling → the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620) → dibh-sa
→ d takes aspiration before s, since the root ends in bh (SK 326) → dhibh-sa
→ bh → p before s (SK 121) → dhipsa → dhipsati.
With ī: dhīpsati. With iṭ: the san is not kit, so the n stays and there is no i → didambhiṣati.
jñapi. Bhaṭṭoji explains the jñapi of SK 2618. It is the short-vowelled (mit) ṇic-stem of jñā, with the augment puk. It is also the curādi root that ends in p of itself. One of his commentators adds that the first is jñā of the ghaṭādi list, whose penultimate is shortened before ṇi.
jñapi + sa (no iṭ) → the stem ends in i, an ik → kit (SK 2612), so the i of ṇi takes no guṇa
→ SK 2614 would lengthen it; but deletion of ṇi (SK 2313), being the later rule, applies instead → jñap-sa
→ ī for a (SK 2619) → jñīp-sa → doubling → the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620) → jñīpsati.
With iṭ: jñapi + iṣa → guṇa and ay of the ṇi → doubling → jijñapayiṣati.
From the stem that is not mit, jñāpi: jijñāpayiṣati. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators says this stem is not covered by SK 2618, so its iṭ is obligatory.
The other roots of SK 2618, which Bhaṭṭoji works in this kaumudī, are set out under SK 2618. So is the vārttika he states here on tan, pat and daridrā.
Watch out. In dhipsati three earlier rules do the work after this one: SK 2613 (kit by the class reading), SK 415 (n lost) and SK 2620 (abhyāsa gone).
Rule. Before a san beginning with s, is replaces the vowel of mī, mā, the ghu roots, rabh, labh, śak, pat and pad. The ghu roots are the dā and dhā roots. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let is be substituted for the ac of these before a san beginning with s". "S" is carried forward from SK 2342. Then the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620).
Example.
patitum icchati, "he wishes to fall", without iṭ:
pat + sa → is for a (this rule) → p-is-t-sa → pist-sa
→ doubling, then the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620) → pist-sa
→ the s at the head of the cluster st is lost (skoḥ…, SK 380) → pitsa → pitsati.
Bhaṭṭoji gives the steps in this order.
daridrā, with and without iṭ (the vārttika under SK 2621): didaridriṣati, didaridrāsati.
mī: Bhaṭṭoji takes two roots, ḍumiñ and mīñ. Ḍumiñ has a short i, but SK 2614 lengthens it before san. "Even [the mi of] minoti, once lengthened, takes is, because its form mī is no different."
mī + sa
→ is
→ mis-sa
→ the s of is becomes t (SK 2342)
→ mitsa
→ doubling, abhyāsa deleted
→ mitsati, mitsate.
One of his commentators says the root is marked with ñ, so both padas are used (SK 2734). The other adds that the san is kit by SK 2613, so there is no guṇa.
That commentator also meets an objection. A maxim says that a form named directly is preferred to one made by a rule (lakṣaṇa-pratipadokta). Minoti's mī is made by a rule. He answers, citing Kaiyaṭa, that the maxim holds where the product of a rule is relied on, not where only the bare form is. So it is not binding (anitya).
mā "to measure": mitsati. Māṅ and meṅ: mitsate. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes that meṅ takes the form mā before san, so it is covered too.
The ghu roots:
ditsati; deṅ: ditsate; dāñ: ditsati, ditsate.dhitsati; dhāñ: dhitsati, dhitsate.dā + sa
→ is
→ dis-sa
→ t for the s of is (SK 2342)
→ ditsa
→ abhyāsa deleted
→ ditsati.
rabh: ripsate. labh: lipsate. śakḷ "to be able": śikṣati.
śak "to endure" (marṣaṇe) is a divādi root, marked by a svarita vowel, so it takes both padas: śikṣati, śikṣate.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators asks whether both śak roots are meant. By a maxim about items named without their markers (niranubandhaka), only śak "to endure" would be taken. He answers that the maxim concerns affixes. So both roots are taken.
pad: pitsate.
Vārttika: rādho hiṃsāyāṃ sanīs vācyaḥ. "Is should be stated [for the ā] of rādh before san, in the sense of injuring (hiṃsā)." ritsati, "he wishes to injure". Why "in the sense of injuring"? In another sense: ārirātsati.
Watch out. Is here is a substitute for a vowel, not the augment iṭ. Its s may change: to t in mitsati (SK 2342), or drop in pitsati (SK 380).
Rule. Muc "to free", when intransitive (akarmaka), optionally takes guṇa before a san beginning with s. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss adds only "before a san beginning with s". One of his commentators gives the carried words, "before san" from SK 2623 and "s" from SK 2342.
Both commentators give the purpose. San after muc is kit by SK 2613, and kittva would bar guṇa. This rule restores it as an option.
Example.
vatsaḥ svayam eva, "the calf [wishes to get free] of its own accord":
muc + sa → guṇa (this rule) → moc-sa → c → k (SK 378) → ṣ (SK 212) → mokṣa
→ doubling, then the abhyāsa is deleted (SK 2620) → mokṣate.
Without guṇa: mukṣa → doubling; the abhyāsa stays → mumukṣate.
Why "intransitive"? mumukṣati vatsaṃ kṛṣṇaḥ, "Kṛṣṇa wishes to free the calf".
Further forms Bhaṭṭoji gives here.
vivṛtsati. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators says the parasmaipada comes optionally by SK 2347. "But with taṅ": vivartiṣate.ninartiṣati, ninṛtsati. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes that the second has a kit san (SK 2613), so no guṇa.Watch out. The abhyāsa is lost only in mokṣate, where this rule has acted. mumukṣate keeps it.
stu + san → stū-ṣa (2614) → tu-ṣṭū-ṣa → tuṣṭūṣati; but sic + sa → si-sik-ṣa → sisikṣati; and svedi + iṣa → sisvedayiṣati (2628)After an iṇ vowel such as i or u, SK 212 normally turns an s into ṣ. So one would expect ṣ after every abhyāsa in i or u, as in a supposed suṣyūṣati from siv. SK 2627 restricts this. Once the san has itself become ṣ, that s becomes ṣ only in stu "to praise" and in a stem ending in ṇi. SK 2628 then takes three ṇi-final stems back out. Stems in ṇi take san too, giving desideratives of causatives. Bhaṭṭoji recalls rules from chapter 54 for them under SK 2626, so they are set out first. The running examples are tuṣṭūṣati "he wishes to praise", sisikṣati "he wishes to sprinkle", and sisvedayiṣati "he wishes to make sweat".
Recalled under SK 2626: san after a ṇi-final stem. These are not sūtras of this chapter. Bhaṭṭoji repeats rules of the ṇic section (chapter 54) and shows them working before san. Here each ṇi-final stem takes san with iṭ. The ṇi then takes guṇa and ay: -ayiṣati.
The two sūtras ṇau ca saṃścaṅoḥ (SK 2601 and SK 2579). Before ṇi followed by san or caṅ, gāṅ optionally replaces iṅ, and śvi optionally takes saṃprasāraṇa.
gā + puk → gāp-i → san with iṭ, guṇa and ay → gāpay-iṣa → doubling, short vowel, i, j → adhijigāpayiṣati.āp-i → adhyāpipayiṣati.śvāy-i → śiśvāyayiṣati.śu is doubled; the second part takes vṛddhi and āv → śuśāvayiṣati.One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives these steps. He says saṃprasāraṇa comes before the other operations in the last form.
hvaḥ saṃprasāraṇam (SK 2586). Hve takes saṃprasāraṇa: hu. "Since it has been stated that, before ṇi, no substitute replaces a vowel before doubling", Bhaṭṭoji says, "the u is doubled."
hve + ṇic, san and iṭ → saṃprasāraṇa → hu-i-iṣa
→ hu is doubled → hu hu-i-iṣa
→ h becomes j in the abhyāsa (SK 2245, SK 2182) → ju hu-i-iṣa
→ the second part takes vṛddhi and āv before ṇi → ju hāv-i-iṣa
→ guṇa and ay of the ṇi → juhāvayiṣati.
Likewise pusphārayiṣati, from sphur with ā by cisphuror ṇau (SK 2569). One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators adds why its abhyāsa keeps u: an s stands between that u and the ph, so no labial follows the u. And cukṣāvayiṣati, from kṣu.
oḥ puyaṇjy apare (SK 2577). The u of an abhyāsa becomes i before a labial (pu), a semivowel (yaṇ) or j that is followed by a.
pipāvayiṣati (pū), bibhāvayiṣati (bhū), yiyāvayiṣati (yu), rirāvayiṣati (ru), lilāvayiṣati (lū), jijāvayiṣati (ju).nunāvayiṣati: n is none of these.bubhūṣati: no a follows.One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the steps. The u-final root itself is doubled, since no vowel substitute is made before ṇi while doubling is due. Then the abhyāsa u becomes i. Both commentators note that ju is a root found only in the sūtras (sautra).
sravati… (SK 2578). For sru and five other roots the i is optional: sisrāvayiṣati / susrāvayiṣati, and so on. "Followed by a" still holds: śuśrūṣate "he wishes to hear". Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give its ātmanepada by jñāśrusmṛdṛśāṃ sanaḥ (SK 2731, taught later).
Rule. When the san has itself become ṣ (ṣaṇ), an s that follows an iṇ vowel of the abhyāsa becomes ṣ only in stu and in a stem ending in ṇi. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let ṣ be substituted for an s that follows an iṇ of the abhyāsa only in stu and in a ṇi-final [stem], when the san has become ṣ; not for [the s] of any other".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators places the rule.
He also explains the word eva, "only". Without it, the rule might be read as "only before ṣaṇ". Then stu would lose its ṣ in the perfect tuṣṭāva.
Example.
stotum icchati, "he wishes to praise":
stu + sa → no iṭ, since stu ends in uk (SK 2610) → long vowel (SK 2614) → stū-sa → kit (SK 2612)
→ the s of san becomes ṣ after ū (SK 212) → stūṣa: the san has become ṣ
→ doubling → stū stūṣa → in the abhyāsa the t after s stays (śarpūrvāḥ khayaḥ, SK 2259), and the vowel is short → tu stūṣa
→ the root's s follows u, an iṇ of the abhyāsa; the root is stu, so ṣ (this rule) → tu ṣtūṣa
→ t → ṭ after ṣ (SK 113) → tuṣṭūṣati.
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators names the lengthening by SK 2614.
ṇi-final stems:
suṣvāpayiṣati, "he wishes to make sleep". Svap + ṇic → vṛddhi → svāp-i → san with iṭ, guṇa and ay → doubling → the abhyāsa's v becomes u (SK 2344) → su svāpayiṣa → the stem ends in ṇi, so ṣ (this rule) → suṣvāpayiṣati.siṣādhayiṣati, from the ṇi-stem sādhi. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators draws the lesson: the noun is siṣādhayiṣā, not sisādhayiṣā.Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji tests each word.
sisikṣati, "he wishes to sprinkle". sic + sa → kit (SK 2613): no guṇa → c → k (SK 378) → ṣ → sikṣa: the san has become ṣ → doubling → si sikṣa → sic is neither stu nor ṇi-final, so no ṣ → sisikṣati.pariṣiṣikṣati. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain by the maxim of the intervening exception (madhye 'pavāda-nyāya). This restriction blocks only the ṣ of SK 212. It does not touch the ṣ of SK 2277, a later rule.tiṣṭhāsati "he wishes to stand" and suṣupsati "he wishes to sleep". Their san follows ā or p, so it keeps its s. The restriction does not apply, and SK 212 gives ṣ freely. One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the steps for sthā: the abhyāsa is shortened and takes i, and ṣ comes by SK 212.pratīṣiṣati (from iṇ, SK 2615) and adhīṣiṣati (from ik). Here the s follows the root i, not an abhyāsa. So, Bhaṭṭoji says, there is no prohibition, and it becomes ṣ.Watch out. Three conditions must all hold for the restriction to bite: the s follows an abhyāsa, the vowel is an iṇ, and the san has become ṣ. Then only stu and the ṇi-final take ṣ. This is why you met susyūṣati, sisaniṣati and sismayiṣate with plain s.
Rule. For svid "to sweat", svad and sah, when they end in ṇi, the s after an iṇ of the abhyāsa stays s, not ṣ, when ṣaṇ follows. Bhaṭṭoji's gloss: "let the s of these, when they end in ṇi, following an iṇ of the abhyāsa, be s only, not ṣ, when ṣaṇ follows".
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators gives the carried words. SK 2627 continues without stu, and "of s" comes from SK 335. He adds that prescribing s for s is itself a restriction: "s only".
Example.
svedayitum icchati, "he wishes to make [someone] sweat":
svid + ṇic → guṇa of the light penultimate (SK 2189) → sved-i
→ san with iṭ; guṇa and ay of the ṇi → svedayiṣa: the san has become ṣ
→ doubling → first consonant only, short vowel → si svedayiṣa
→ SK 2627 would allow ṣ for a ṇi-final stem; this rule keeps s → sisvedayiṣati.
Likewise sisvādayiṣati (svad) and sisāhayiṣati (sah).
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji adds abhisusūṣati, from su with abhi. The s of the second part stays s by SK 2627, one of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators notes. Might the abhyāsa take ṣ after the upasarga, by SK 2270? No: "because of the restriction sthādiṣv abhyāsena". SK 2277 lets the abhyāsa take ṣ only in sthā and the roots listed with it. The same commentator explains the suspicion so. The other adds that SK 2524 is still needed, for the noun abhisusūḥ.
The Bhāṣya verse. Bhaṭṭoji ends the chapter with a verse he labels as the Bhāṣya's:
"After a śaiṣika [affix], a śaiṣika, and after one in the sense of matup, one in the sense of matup, of the same form (sarūpa), is not wanted; after a sannanta, san is not wanted."
Whether it is the Bhāṣya's own or a vārttika in verse, scholars discuss this.
A śaiṣika is an affix taught under the heading śeṣa, "the remainder", such as those meaning "being in". Matup is the possessive affix -mat / -vat. Bhaṭṭoji explains each clause.
āhicchatraḥ, with the affix aṇ. And āhicchatre bhavaḥ gives āhicchatrīyaḥ: cha after a form ending in aṇ. The two affixes differ in form, so the second may come.daṇḍimatī śālā, "a hall that has staff-bearers".So a desiderative san does not come after a form that already ends in a desiderative san. But it does come after a sannanta whose san is in the root's own sense (svārtha):
gup + san (SK 2393) → jugupsa "to censure" → + the desiderative san (SK 2608) with iṭ → jugupsiṣate, "he wishes to censure".
Likewise mīmāṃsiṣate, from mīmāṃsa (SK 2394).
One of Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explains why "same form" must mean sameness of meaning. Two *san*s cannot differ in sound at all. So only their senses can make them "same" or "different".
Here ends the sannanta-prakriyā, the section on the san-final.
Watch out. The restriction of SK 2627 gives ṣ to every ṇi-final stem. This rule removes three. sisvedayiṣati has s, though suṣvāpayiṣati has ṣ.
| SK | What it does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 2608 | desiderative san after a root whose action is wished, same agent; it is ārdhadhātuka and takes iṭ | pipaṭhiṣati, jighatsati, īrṣyiyiṣati / īrṣyiṣiṣati |
| 2609 | san (and ktvā) kit after rud, vid, muṣ, grah, svap, pracch | rurudiṣati, vividiṣati, mumuṣiṣati |
| 2612 | jhal-initial san kit after an ik-final root | bubhūṣati, didīṣate |
| 2613 | jhal-initial san kit after a consonant (class) near an ik | bibhitsati, jughukṣati, titṛkṣati / titṛṃhiṣati |
| 2617 | san with iṭ optionally kit after a consonant-initial, ral-final root with u/i penultimate; penultimate operations beat doubling | didyutiṣate / didyotiṣate; eṣiṣiṣati |
| 2610 | no iṭ after grah, guh and uk-final roots | jighṛkṣati, suṣupsati, bubhūṣati |
| 2611 | iṭ after kṝ, gṝ, dṛṅ, dhṛṅ, pracch; vārttika: no long iṭ | pipṛcchiṣati, cikariṣati, didariṣate; uddidhīrṣuḥ (not this rule: bhvādi dhṛ) |
| 2618 | optional iṭ after iv-final roots, ṛdh, bhrasj, dambh, śri, svṛ, yu, ūrṇu, bhṛ, jñapi, san | dudyūṣati / dideviṣati, śiśrīṣati / śiśrayiṣati, ūrṇunūṣati / ūrṇunuviṣati, ūrṇunaviṣati, siṣāsati / sisaniṣati |
| 2625 | optional iṭ after vṛṅ, vṛñ and roots in ṝ (in upadeśa) | titariṣati, titarīṣati, titīrṣati; dudhvūrṣati |
| 2626 | iṭ after smi, pūṅ, ṛ, añjū, aś; ucch; recalls for ṇi-final stems | sismayiṣate, pipaviṣate, aririṣati, ucicchiṣati; juhāvayiṣati, pipāvayiṣati |
| 2614 | long vowel before jhal-initial san: final vowel, penultimate of han and of gam for a vowel-root | cicīṣati / cikīṣati, jigīṣati, jighāṃsati |
| 2622 | optional long penultimate of tan; vārttika: san of apprehension | titāṃsati / titaṃsati; śvā mumūrṣati |
| 2615 | gam for iṇ before san, not in making known; vārttika: ik likewise | jigamiṣati, pratīṣiṣati, adhijigamiṣati; passive jigāṃsyate |
| 2616 | gam for iṅ before san | adhijigāṃsate |
| 2619 | ī for the vowel of āp, jñap, ṛdh before s-initial san | īpsati, īrtsati, jñīpsati |
| 2620 | the abhyāsa is deleted where SK 2623, 2619, 2621, 2624 apply | īpsati; but ardidhiṣati |
| 2621 | i or ī for the vowel of dambh | dhipsati, dhīpsati / didambhiṣati |
| 2623 | is for the vowel of mī, mā, ghu, rabh, labh, śak, pat, pad; vārttika: rādh in injuring | pitsati, mitsati, ditsati, lipsate, śikṣati; ritsati |
| 2624 | optional guṇa for intransitive muc | mokṣate / mumukṣate; mumukṣati vatsam |
| 2627 | ṣ after an abhyāsa's iṇ, before ṣaṇ, only in stu and ṇi-final stems | tuṣṭūṣati, suṣvāpayiṣati; but sisikṣati (no ṣ); pariṣiṣikṣati (ṣ by SK 2277) |
| 2628 | s stays for ṇi-final svid, svad, sah; Bhāṣya verse: no san after a desiderative sannanta | sisvedayiṣati; jugupsiṣate, mīmāṃsiṣate |