This chapter walks the eighth class of roots, the tanādi roots, "the roots beginning with tan". There are only ten of them, from tanu "to extend" to ḍukṛñ "to do". In all of them the class affix u stands in place of śap, so the present is tanoti, sanoti, karoti. The chapter has only seven sūtras, and each has one job. SK 2547 lets the aorist affix sic drop before ta and thās, giving short aorists such as atata beside ataniṣṭa. SK 2548–2549 make the root kṛ lose its u before m, v and y: kurvaḥ, kurmaḥ, kuryāt. SK 2550–2553 add an s, the augment suṭ, to kṛ after sam, pari and upa in certain senses. That gives saṃskaroti "he adorns", pariṣkaroti and upaskṛta. Finally you will see how this s, placed before the k, changes kṛ in the perfect, the benedictive and the aorist: saṃcaskāra, saṃcaskaratuḥ, saṃcaskaritha, saṃskriyāt, saṃskṛṣīṣṭa. After this chapter you will be able to give the main forms of every tanādi root and derive the suṭ forms of kṛ.
kriyāt). You know SK 2368, uś ca, which makes the ātmanepada liṅ and sic kit after ṛ. You know SK 2369: sic drops after a short vowel. You know SK 2379 and SK 2380, two guṇa rules for roots in ṛ that begin with a consonant cluster.kurutaḥ). You know SK 2428, which drops the nasal of tan and similar roots before certain affixes.upāskirat, upacaskāra).a-tan-sic-ta → a-tan-ta → a-ta-ta → atata (with luk) / a-tan-iṭ-s-ta → ataniṣṭa (without); kṛ + u + ti → kar-o-ti → karotiThis group gives the one sūtra of the chapter that concerns all the tanādi roots. In the ātmanepada aorist, sic may be deleted before ta and thās. Bhaṭṭoji teaches it on the first root, tan, and then walks the list of ten roots. The running example is tan in the aorist: with luk of sic it gives atata "he extended"; without it, ataniṣṭa. The group ends with the present of kṛ: karoti, kurutaḥ, kurvanti.
Rule. After tan and the roots that follow it, luk (deletion) of sic happens optionally when ta or thās follows. "luk" is carried forward from SK 1276, "of sic" from SK 2223, and "optionally" from SK 2376.
Example.
tan + luṅ → aṭ and cli → sic → a-tan-s-ta (ātmanepada, ta)
→ this rule: luk of sic → a-tan-ta
→ SK 2428: the nasal n of the root drops → a-ta-ta → atata "he extended".
Without luk: iṭ comes before sic → a-tan-i-s-ta → ataniṣṭa. (The s becomes ṣ after i, and the t after it becomes ṭ. These are sound changes taught elsewhere. They recur in asaniṣṭa, akṣaṇiṣṭa and ataniṣṭhāḥ.)
In the same way, before thās: atathāḥ / ataniṣṭhāḥ "you extended".
Applies when / blocked by. Only the singular ta counts. ta is named together with thās, and that association (sāhacarya) restricts it to the singular. So the ta that replaces tha in the parasmaipada plural does not count. In yūyam ataniṣṭa "you (plural) extended" there is no luk. Bhaṭṭoji himself gives this counter-example; his commentators explain that this ta replaces tha.
The roots of the class. Bhaṭṭoji opens the class with the words "now seven roots are svaritet". They take both sets of endings. In every one the affix u replaces śap, by SK 2466.
tanu "to extend". tanoti (present). tanvaḥ / tanuvaḥ "we two extend": the u may drop before v (SK 2333). tanute (ātmanepada). Perfect tatāna, tene. Imperative tanu "extend!": hi drops after the u (SK 2334). Parasmaipada aorist atanīt / atānīt.
ṣaṇu "to give". Its initial is ṣ as taught, and it appears as san. sanoti, sanute. In the benedictive, ā comes optionally before y (SK 2319): sāyāt / sanyāt.
In the ātmanepada aorist, sic drops by this rule. The affix ta now begins with t, a jhal (a consonant other than a nasal or semivowel). So ā replaces the n by SK 2504: asāta. Without luk, iṭ comes, and the affix after the root begins with the vowel i. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators note that no jhal then follows, so SK 2504 cannot apply and there is no ā: asaniṣṭa. Before thās: asāthāḥ / asaniṣṭhāḥ.
kṣaṇu "to injure". kṣaṇoti, kṣaṇute. In the aorist there is no vṛddhi, by SK 2299, which names kṣaṇ: akṣaṇīt. Ātmanepada aorist akṣata / akṣaṇiṣṭa, akṣathāḥ / akṣaṇiṣṭhāḥ.
kṣiṇu, also "to injure". Its penultimate i is light. Should it take guṇa before the affix u, by SK 2189? Ātreya and others say no. They rely on a paribhāṣā, a rule about reading rules: "an operation enjoined by a technical name is not obligatory". SK 2189 enjoins guṇa by that name, without naming the vowel. So, on their view, this guṇa need not come. Others say it does come. Scholars discuss this. Forms: kṣiṇoti / kṣeṇoti; periphrastic future kṣeṇitāsi, kṣeṇitāse; aorist akṣeṇīt; ātmanepada aorist akṣita / akṣeṇiṣṭa.
ṛṇu "to go". Bhaṭṭoji's commentators say guṇa and its absence go as with kṣiṇu: ṛṇoti / arṇoti. Dual arṇutaḥ. In the plural the u becomes v before the vowel (yaṇ): arṇvanti. Perfect ānarṇa, ānṛṇe. Periphrastic future arṇitāsi. Aorist ārṇīt. Ātmanepada aorist ārta / ārṇiṣṭa, ārthāḥ / ārṇiṣṭhāḥ.
tṛṇu "to eat": tṛṇoti / tarṇoti, tṛṇute / tarṇute. ghṛṇu "to shine": perfect jagharṇa, jaghṛṇe.
Then two roots are anudāttet, so they take ātmanepada. vanu "to ask": vanute, perfect vavane. In Candra's view it takes parasmaipada: vanoti, vavāna. manu "to understand": manute, perfect mene.
The root kṛ. Last comes ḍukṛñ "to do". It is named on its own in SK 2466, so it too takes u.
kṛ + u + ti
→ the ṛ takes guṇa because of the affix u, with r after it → kar-u-ti
→ the u takes guṇa because of tip, the ending ti of "he" → kar-o-ti → karoti "he does".
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give these two steps.
kar-u + tas → tas is the ending of "the two". It is ṅit, so the u takes no guṇa
→ SK 2467: the a of kar becomes u → kur-u-tas → kurutaḥ "the two do".
kuru + anti (anti, the ending of "they") → yaṇ: the u becomes v before the vowel → kurv-anti.
A rule called hali ca would now lengthen the u of kur. SK 1629, na bhakurchurām, blocks it → kurvanti "they do".
Watch out. The ta of SK 2547 must be the singular ātmanepada ta. The parasmaipada ta that replaces tha does not count, so yūyam ataniṣṭa keeps its sic.
kuru + vas → kur-vas → kurvaḥ; kuru + yāt → kur-yāt → kuryātFor tan, the u may drop before m or v (SK 2333): tanvaḥ / tanuvaḥ. For kṛ the drop is not optional. SK 2548 makes it obligatory before m and v. SK 2549 adds a third case, before y. The running example: kuru + vas loses its u and gives kurvaḥ "we two do"; kuru + yāt gives kuryāt "he should do".
Rule. After kṛ, the u of the affix is always deleted when m or v follows. "The u of an affix" comes from SK 2334; "deletion" and "before m or v" come from SK 2333. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators give these sources.
Example.
kṛ + u + vas (vas, the ending of "we two"; mas is that of "we") → guṇa of ṛ → kar-u-vas
→ vas is ṅit, so SK 2467 gives kur-u-vas
→ this rule: the u drops before v → kur-vas → kurvaḥ "we two do".
Likewise kuru + mas → kurmaḥ "we do".
Applies when / blocked by. The word nityam "always" is the point of the rule. It sets kṛ apart from SK 2333, where the drop is optional. So tan keeps two forms, tanvaḥ / tanuvaḥ, but kṛ has only kurvaḥ.
Other forms of kṛ. Bhaṭṭoji lists more forms here.
cakartha "you did". There is no iṭ, by SK 2293. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators add that the root ends in ṛ, so even Bhāradvāja's view (SK 2296) gives no iṭ.cakṛva "we two did", ātmanepada cakṛṣe "you did".kartā, simple future kariṣyati.karotu / kurutāt, kuru, karavāṇi, akarot, akuruta.Watch out. The m or v is that of an ending, as in vas and mas. Before a vowel the u does not drop; it becomes v (kurvanti, SK 2547).
Rule. The u of kṛ is also deleted when an affix beginning with y follows. "Deletion" and "of this" come from SK 2333, and "of kṛ" from SK 2548. The y describes the affix, so a y-initial affix is meant. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain this.
Example.
kṛ + u + yāt (optative, vidhiliṅ) → kur-u-yāt
→ this rule: the u drops before y → kur-yāt → kuryāt "he should do".
Other forms of kṛ. Bhaṭṭoji continues the paradigm.
kriyāt "may he do".kṛṣīṣṭa. The affix is kit by SK 2368, so there is no guṇa.akārṣīt: vṛddhi before sic, with r after it.akṛta, akṛthāḥ. With luk of sic by SK 2547, this form is reached directly. Without luk, sic is deleted anyway, by SK 2369, after the short ṛ. Either way no s is heard.Applies when / blocked by. In the second path, could the deleted sic still cause guṇa, by pratyayalakṣaṇa? Bhaṭṭoji's commentators say no. sic here is kit by SK 2368, and a kit affix prohibits guṇa. So the form stays akṛta.
Watch out. SK 2548 and SK 2549 apply only to kṛ. For tan, the drop before m and v is optional (SK 2333).
sam + kṛ + u + ti → sam + s-kṛ + u + ti → saṃskaroti; pari + s-kṛ → pariṣkaroti; upa + s-kṛ + ta → upaskṛtāBhaṭṭoji now gives kṛ a special augment. An augment (āgama) is a sound added to a form, not in place of anything. Here it is suṭ, heard as s, put before the k of kṛ. It comes only after certain upasargas, prefixes such as sam, pari and upa, and only in certain senses. These three sūtras give the upasargas and the senses. Where the s goes is taught in SK 2553, in group D. The running example: sam + kṛ in the sense "adorn" becomes saṃskaroti "he adorns".
Rule. After sam and pari, the augment suṭ is added to kṛ when adorning (bhūṣaṇa) is meant. "suṭ" is carried forward from SK 2553, which Bhaṭṭoji teaches just after this group.
Example.
sam + kṛ + u + ti, in the sense "adorn"
→ this rule: suṭ for kṛ → sam + skṛ + u + ti
→ as for karoti, and m becomes ṃ before s → saṃskaroti "he adorns", that is, alaṃkaroti.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji gives no gloss under this sūtra by itself. He explains it together with the next one, SK 2551, and the example saṃskaroti is given there.
Watch out. The sūtra names only sam and pari. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators note that he reads it so, following the Bhāṣya and the vārttika. upa gets its own sūtra, SK 2552.
Rule. suṭ is also added to kṛ after sam and pari when aggregation (samavāya, coming together) is meant. "After sam and pari, to kṛ" runs on from SK 2550. Bhaṭṭoji glosses the two sūtras as one: suṭ comes to kṛ after sam or pari in the senses of adorning and of coming together (saṃghāta).
Example.
sam + kṛ + u + anti, in the sense "come together"
→ this rule: suṭ → sam + skṛ + u + anti
→ as for kurvanti, and m becomes ṃ before s → saṃskurvanti "they come together", that is, saṅghībhavanti.
Applies when / blocked by. After sam, suṭ sometimes comes even when adorning is not meant. The sign of this is the wording saṃskṛtaṃ bhakṣāḥ (SK 1217). There saṃskṛta means "prepared", not "adorned". Such a sign in the wording of a sūtra is a jñāpaka.
After pari, the s of suṭ becomes ṣ, by SK 2275: pariṣkaroti.
When aṭ stands between pari and the s, the ṣ is optional, by SK 2359: aorist paryaṣkārṣīt / paryaskārṣīt.
Rule. After upa, suṭ is added to kṛ in three senses. They are pratiyatna, vaikṛta and vākyādhyāhāra. By the word ca "and", suṭ comes after upa in the two senses of SK 2550–2551 as well.
Bhaṭṭoji defines the three senses:
Example. Bhaṭṭoji gives five examples, one for each sense.
upaskṛtā kanyā "an adorned girl" (alaṃkṛtā): adorning.upaskṛtā brāhmaṇāḥ "the brāhmaṇas have assembled" (samuditāḥ): coming together.edho dakasyopaskurute "the fuel imparts a quality to the water": pratiyatna.upaskṛtaṃ bhuṅkte "he eats what has been altered": vaikṛta.upaskṛtaṃ brūte "he speaks, supplying what the sentence lacks": vākyādhyāhāra.Step by step for the first:
upa + kṛ + ta (past participle), in the sense "adorn"
→ this rule: suṭ → upa + skṛ + ta → upaskṛta → feminine upaskṛtā.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators read "the two senses stated before" as adorning and coming together.
sam + s-kṛ + ṇal → sam + skṛ-skṛ + a → saṃ-ca-skār-a → saṃcaskāra; saṃ-ca-skṛ + atus → saṃcaskaratuḥBhaṭṭoji's commentators open this group with an objection. Doubling in the perfect depends only on the root and its affix. So it is antaraṅga, "inner", and comes first. The suṭ of SK 2550 depends on two words, the upasarga and the root. So it is bahiraṅga, "outer". Then in the perfect the root would be doubled first, and the s would stand before the abhyāsa. The last sūtra answers this. It places suṭ right before the k. The running example: sam + skṛ + a gives saṃcaskāra "he adorned", and the dual saṃcaskaratuḥ.
Rule. The augment suṭ is placed before the k of kṛ. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain that this sūtra is a heading (adhikāra). In the Aṣṭādhyāyī it governs the rules after it, up to but not including anudāttaṃ padam ekavarjam. SK 2550, SK 2551 and SK 2552 are among them. Because it says "before" (pūrvaḥ), they add, suṭ never stands before the abhyāsa.
Example. This is the sūtra's own route: the root is doubled first, and suṭ then goes before the k of the root, across the abhyāsa.
sam + kṛ + ṇal, that is sam + kṛ + a (ṇal is the perfect ending a of "he")
→ doubling (SK 2177) → sam + kṛ-kṛ + a
→ in the abhyāsa, ṛ becomes a (SK 2244), only one consonant is kept (SK 2179), and k becomes c (SK 2245) → ca
→ the second kṛ takes vṛddhi before ṇal, which is marked with ṇ (SK 254) → kār → sam + ca-kār-a
→ this rule, with the vārttika given at SK 2539: suṭ goes before the k of the root, even though the abhyāsa stands between → sam + ca-s-kār-a
→ m becomes ṃ before c → saṃcaskāra "he adorned".
In the imperfect, suṭ goes before the k across aṭ: samaskarot.
Applies when / blocked by. Bhaṭṭoji says the point was already stated under SK 2539. A vārttika there puts suṭ before the k even when aṭ or the abhyāsa stands between. So saṃcaskāra, with the abhyāsa between, and samaskarot, with aṭ between. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators explain why it is needed. In saṃskaroti nothing stands between, and the rule is satisfied there. Without the vārttika, suṭ could not reach the k of the root past the abhyāsa or aṭ.
The Bhāṣya's view. The Bhāṣya rejects the words "before the k" and the rest. On its view suṭ alone is the heading. Its reason: "first the root is joined with the upasarga", and only then with the affix. So suṭ, which depends on root and upasarga, is the inner operation. It comes first; doubling follows. Bhaṭṭoji's commentators derive saṃcaskāra this way:
sam + skṛ + a (suṭ already in place)
→ doubling (SK 2177) → sam + skṛ-skṛ + a
→ in the abhyāsa, ṛ becomes a with r after it (SK 2244) → skar
→ only the k is kept, since it follows the sibilant s (SK 2259) → ka
→ k becomes c (SK 2245) → ca
→ the second skṛ takes vṛddhi before ṇal (SK 254) → skār
→ saṃ-ca-skār-a → saṃcaskāra.
On this route the s of the abhyāsa is copied and then dropped. On the sūtra's route it never enters the abhyāsa. The form is the same.
Consequences for kṛ with suṭ. With suṭ made first, the root is skṛ. It now begins with a consonant cluster (saṃyoga). Bhaṭṭoji draws out four results.
1. Guṇa in the perfect. By SK 2379, a root in ṛ that begins with a cluster takes guṇa in liṭ. So:
saṃ-ca-skṛ + atus → SK 2379: guṇa, with r after it → saṃ-ca-skar + atus → saṃcaskaratuḥ "the two adorned".
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators add: had the root met its affix first, there would be no such guṇa.
2. iṭ in the perfect. A vārttika says SK 2293 and SK 2296 apply to kṛ only without suṭ (kṛño 'suṭaḥ). These are the rules that deny iṭ to kṛ in liṭ. So kṛ with suṭ takes iṭ:
saṃ-ca-skṛ + tha → iṭ → saṃ-ca-skṛ + i + tha → guṇa → saṃcaskaritha "you adorned".
Likewise saṃcaskariva "we two adorned". Compare plain cakartha, cakṛva (SK 2548).
3. No guṇa in the benedictive. SK 2380 gives guṇa before the y of the benedictive to a root in ṛ that begins with a cluster. But in that sūtra the word nityam "always" runs on from SK 3587. So the rule means a root that is always cluster-initial. skṛ begins with a cluster only because of suṭ. So there is no guṇa, and riṅ comes as in kriyāt:
sam + skṛ + yāt → riṅ (SK 2367) → saṃskriyāt "may he adorn".
4. No iṭ in the ātmanepada benedictive and aorist. SK 2526 gives an optional iṭ to liṅ and sic after a cluster-initial root in ṛ. That iṭ does not come here. The rule carries the word upadeśe "as taught" from SK 2246. So it covers only a root that begins with a cluster in its original form. kṛ as taught is not such a root. So:
benedictive saṃskṛṣīṣṭa; aorist samaskṛta, dual samaskṛṣātām.
Bhaṭṭoji's commentators present the last three as answers to objections. With this the tanādi roots end.
Watch out. Keep the two kinds of cluster apart. For SK 2379 any cluster at the start of the root counts, even one made by suṭ: saṃcaskaratuḥ. For SK 2380 the cluster must be there always; for SK 2526 it must be there as the root is taught. skṛ's cluster is neither: saṃskriyāt, saṃskṛṣīṣṭa.
asāta, not in asaniṣṭa).kurvanti, arṇvanti).karoti). Beside it stand tas "the two", anti "they", vas "we two" and mas "we".kuryāt) / liṅ of blessing, the benedictive (kriyāt).kriyāt.cakartha, saṃcaskāra).saṃcaskāra.| SK | What it does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 2547 | After tan and the rest, luk of sic is optional before singular ta and thās. | atata / ataniṣṭa; asāta; akṛta |
| 2547 (roots) | The ten tanādi roots take u for śap (SK 2466). | tanoti, sanoti, kṣiṇoti / kṣeṇoti, karoti, kurutaḥ, kurvanti |
| 2548 | The u after kṛ is always deleted before m or v. | kurvaḥ, kurmaḥ (but tanvaḥ / tanuvaḥ) |
| 2549 | The u of kṛ is deleted before a y-initial affix. | kuryāt; also kriyāt, kṛṣīṣṭa, akārṣīt |
| 2550 | After sam and pari, suṭ comes to kṛ when adorning is meant. | saṃskaroti "he adorns" |
| 2551 | Also when coming together is meant; after pari, ṣ (SK 2275). | saṃskurvanti, pariṣkaroti, paryaṣkārṣīt / paryaskārṣīt |
| 2552 | After upa, suṭ for imparting a quality, alteration, supplying a sentence, and the two earlier senses. | upaskṛtā kanyā, edho dakasyopaskurute, upaskṛtaṃ bhuṅkte |
| 2553 | suṭ stands before the k, even across aṭ or the abhyāsa; a heading for 2550–2552. | saṃcaskāra, saṃcaskaratuḥ, saṃcaskaritha, saṃskriyāt, saṃskṛṣīṣṭa, samaskṛta |