Covers SK 2151–2422 (272 sūtras): all present (written in four parts, each coverage-checked by script: 2151–2218, 2219–2286, 2287–2354, 2355–2422). The spine is not an Aṣṭādhyāyī run: the SK assembles the tiṅanta machinery in derivation order around the root bhū, taking sūtras from AS books 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 (e.g. 3.2.123 → 3.4.69 → 1.4.99 → 1.3.12 … 2.4.85 … 8.4.54). Every AS-ref below is checked against references/ashtadhyayi/sutraani-data.json.
- Anuvṛtti from later in the SK. Because the SK reorders the AS, many words these rules carry forward come from sūtras the SK teaches only later: dhātoḥ (3.1.91, SK 2829), kartari kṛt (3.4.67, SK 2832), bhūte (3.2.84, SK 2995), bhaviṣyati gamyādayaḥ (3.3.3, SK 3171), sārvadhātuke yak (3.1.67, SK 2756), liṅaḥ sīyuṭ (3.4.102, SK 2255), rudādibhyaḥ sārvadhātuke (7.2.76, SK 2474), itaś ca lopaḥ parasmaipadeṣu (3.4.97, SK 3426), sa uttamasya (3.4.98, SK 3428), laṅaḥ śākaṭāyanasyaiva (3.4.111, SK 2463). The outline names them where the commentators do.
tiṅantabhvādiprakaraṇam — outline (p44, SK 2151–2422, all 272 sūtras)
p43 (dviruktaprakaraṇam) closed at 2150 with dvandvam and the close of the pūrvārdha.
- Where the prakaraṇa begins. It opens the second half (uttarārdha) of the SK and the tiṅanta (verb) section. The 1915 print (NSP scan page-0341) heads it "uttarārdham | tiṅante bhvādigaṇaḥ 41"; our numbering is p44, and our intro-uttara carries only an editorial label.
- Before 2151 the print has Bhaṭṭoji's two maṅgala verses (the second says the pūrvārdha taught affixes of adhyāyas 4–5 and the affixes of adhyāya 3 are now told) and the prose "tatrādau daśa lakārāḥ pradarśyante": laṭ, liṭ, luṭ, lṛṭ, leṭ, loṭ, laṅ, liṅ, luṅ, lṛṅ, "of these the fifth is found only in the Veda". Both are missing from our digital mūla (collation batch01; open for Ajai). TB glosses both, and sk2151's notes record the lakāra list.
- The first sūtra is vartamāne laṭ (3.2.123). From there the SK derives one root, bhū "to be" (bhvādi 1), through every lakāra in turn, introducing each rule at the point in the derivation where it first bites. Only parasmaipada forms of bhū occur in this part; the ātmanepada model (edh) begins after SK 2232.
- Where Part I ends. At 2218 luṅ (3.2.110), which introduces the aorist. Its forms (abhūt …: cli, sic, luk of sic) follow in SK 2219 ff., then lṛṅ (2229); both lie in part 2. (The prakaraṇa ends at SK 2422.)
- Contents of Part I.
- 2151–2154: the lakāra and its substitutes. laṭ in the present; what a lakāra denotes; the l as heading; the eighteen tiṅ.
- 2155–2159: parasmaipada or ātmanepada. The two names, the root-markers that choose ātmanepada, and bhū's default to parasmaipada.
- 2160–2165: person and number. prathama/madhyama/uttama, ekavacana etc., the yuṣmad/asmad rules and prahāsa. Result:
bhū + ti. - 2166–2170: laṭ of bhū. sārvadhātuka, śap, guṇa, ant for jh, lengthening before yañ: bhavati … bhavāmaḥ.
- 2171–2174: liṭ, the endings and vuk. bhū + ṇal → bhūv a.
- 2175–2184: reduplication and the rest of liṭ. The doubling heading, the abhyāsa rules, asiddhavat and iṭ: babhūva … babhūvima.
- 2185–2193: the two futures. luṭ (tās, ḍā/rau/ras, tās-loss): bhavitā …; lṛṭ (sya): bhaviṣyati ….
- 2194–2204: loṭ. eruḥ, tātaṅ, loṭo laṅvat, hi and its luk, ni and āṭ: bhavatu … bhavāma.
- 2205–2207: laṅ. aṭ and loss of i: abhavat … abhavāma.
- 2208–2214: vidhiliṅ. The six senses, yāsuṭ, suṭ, s-loss, iy, jus: bhavet … bhavema.
- 2215–2217: āśīrliṅ. ārdhadhātuka, kit yāsuṭ, no guṇa: bhūyāt … bhūyāsma.
- 2218: luṅ introduced (forms in part 2).
Threads that run through Part I:
- The headings. dhātoḥ (3.1.91, SK 2829) governs every lakāra and vikaraṇa rule to the end of adhyāya 3 (BM, TB on 2151). lasya (2153) governs the substitutes. bhūte (3.2.84, SK 2995) governs liṭ, laṅ, luṅ; bhaviṣyati (3.3.3, SK 3171) governs luṭ and lṛṭ. aṅgasya (6.4.1, SK 200) governs the aṅga operations.
- What a lakāra denotes. It denotes the kartṛ, karman or bhāva (2152). Time (present, past…) qualifies the root's action and laṭ etc. only make it manifest (dyotaka: BM, TB on 2151). For liṅ's senses both views, dyotya and vācya, stand; TB prefers dyotaka (2208).
- The choice cascade for any tiṅ form: lakāra (by time/mood) → pada (2155–2159: bhū has no ātmanepada marker, so parasmaipada) → puruṣa (2162–2165) → vacana (2161 with 1.4.21–22) → one of nine endings. 2165's kaumudī walks it for
bhū + ti. - sārvadhātuka vs ārdhadhātuka. tiṅ are sārvadhātuka (2166), but the tiṅ of liṭ (2172) and of āśīrliṅ (2215) are ārdhadhātuka only ("eva" from 3.4.111, SK 2463). So they take no śap (babhūva, bhūyāt on the bare root), they take iṭ where val-initial (babhūvitha), and the sārvadhātuka-liṅ rules (s-loss 2211, iy 2212) do not reach bhūyāt.
- ṅit lakāras. laṅ, liṅ, luṅ, lṛṅ are ṅit: tām/tam/ta/am (2199), s-loss of the uttama (2200), loss of i (2207). loṭ borrows the first two by loṭo laṅvat (2198) but not aṭ, which is taught for the aṅga, not in place of laṅ (BM, TB).
- The "dve" of reduplication is two utterances (dviḥprayoga), not substitution (BM on 2177, from the Bhāṣya). This is the reverse of p43's sarvasya dve, read as sthāne-dvirvacana.
- The kaumudī lists forms bare. Derivation stages cited below (bhū bhūv a, bhavit ā, bhava yās s t …) are BM's, as recorded in the unit notes; person/number labels are the translator's.
Where the p44 audit (.work/sk-run/p44-audit-fixes.md and the reports sk2151-2164 … sk2207-2220) corrects a reading, this outline follows the corrected reading. They were applied in the audit fix pass.
- 2177 (must-fix): anabhyāsa qualifies the ekāc part, not the dhātu (BM "abhyāsabhinnasya … dhātvavayavasya"): "the first single-vowelled part of the dhātu, that part not being an abhyāsa".
- 2175–2176: the doubling heading runs up to, not including, ṣyaṅaḥ saṃprasāraṇam… (6.1.13, SK 1003) (BM). At 2176 "ekāc" is supplied (śeṣa), not carried.
- 2186: yathāsaṃkhya holds: sya with lṛ, tāsi with luṭ (NSP fn).
- 2183: BM reads the operation as asiddha (supplying "vihitaṃ kāryam"); TB holds the rule asiddha (śāstrāsiddhatva) and assigns the operation view to the prācīnas. Both are recorded.
- 2171: BM makes parokṣa qualify the root's meaning; TB says the imperceptibility of the means (sādhana) is meant, since every action is imperceptible. Neutral here.
- 2165: śeṣa = outside the madhyama/uttama rules of 2162–2164 (2163 included).
- 2187: the pratyāhāra is val (not "vaḷ").
- 2207: BM on itaś ca exists, printed under sk.2253.b1 ("lasya" in force; lopa and parasmaipadeṣu from 3.4.97).
- 2208: NSP fn 3 (filed under sk.2198.n1) glosses saṃpraśna as deliberation "should this be done or that?".
- 2210, 2216: no Western mood names: "vidhiliṅ", "in benediction (āśiṣi)".
- 2215: the "eva" anuvṛtti is TB's (no BM exists on 2215).
Print readings (NSP, scan-confirmed) that the outline follows:
- babhūvatuḥ (2183; ours "babhūvatu"); vugyuṭāv uvaṅyaṇoḥ (2183 k2);
- TB's "saṃbhavāt" at 2192 is a misprint for BM's "asaṃbhavāt" (tās only, since no r-initial affix is possible after as).
Still open for Ajai (mūla):
- the missing uttarārdha maṅgala verses and the ten-lakāra prose before 2151 (intro-uttara);
- the lost sentence at 2214: ours "… iy iti vyākhyeyam | evaṃ tu sandhir ārṣaḥ", print "… iy iti vyākhyeyam | evaṃ ca salopasyāpavāda iy | 'ato yeyaḥ 2212' ity atra tu sandhir ārṣaḥ" (eye-skip; Wikisource and BM's lemmas agree with the print);
- the 2183 slip babhūvatu and the misplaced "(vārttikam)" tag (it belongs before k2, not k3).
Ordering: SK order throughout; no reordering. Groups follow the lakāra-by-lakāra sequence of the SK.
The four parts. 272 sūtras are too many for one list of groups, so the outline runs in four parts, each with its own lettered groups (I.A … IV.N):
- Part I — SK 2151–2218: bhū through every lakāra.
- Part II — SK 2219–2286: luṅ/lṛṅ of bhū, the edh paradigm, liṭ by ām, the anudātta and ṣ/ṇ-initial roots.
- Part III — SK 2287–2354: roots 55–845 — liṭ iṭ, aorist stems, āya/ṇiṅ, caṅ, the dyutādi, vṛtādi, ghaṭādi.
- Part IV — SK 2355–2422: roots 846–1010 to the end of the bhvādi, and ṛter īyaṅ.
Part I — SK 2151–2218: bhū through every lakāra
I.A. The lakāra and the l that the endings replace — running example: bhū + laṭ → bhū + l → bhū + tip
- 2151 vartamāne laṭ 3.2.123 — laṭ after a root whose action is present. dhātoḥ (3.1.91, SK 2829) is the heading to the end of adhyāya 3.
- "Present" qualifies the root's action, not the kartṛ (else pacati of a present cook whose cooking is past); laṭ only makes it manifest (BM, TB). NSP fn: presentness = being the substrate of an action begun and not yet finished.
- The a and ṭ are it: the a is not merely for pronunciation, since it distinguishes laṭ from liṭ and the rest (BM, TB).
- Here bhū "being", present:
bhū + laṭ → bhū + l. - 2152 laḥ karmaṇi ca bhāve cākarmakebhyaḥ 3.4.69 — two statements (BM). After sakarmaka roots the lakāras denote the karman and (by "ca", kartari from 3.4.67, SK 2832) the kartṛ; after akarmaka roots, bhāva and kartṛ (never karman).
- bhū is akarmaka, so its l may denote kartṛ or bhāva. Every form in this part is kartari.
- Roots whose karman is not intended count as akarmaka: neha bhujyate (BM; TB, from Haradatta, holds this the stronger view).
- NSP fn 2 takes "laḥ" as singular (the class); BM as plural. The English "lakāras" follows the kaumudī's own "lakārāḥ".
- 2153 lasya 3.4.77 — heading: in place of l. The a of "la" is not intended, so all ten lakāras are covered. Only an l introduced after a root is meant, so there is nothing to replace in cūḍāla or lunāti (BM; TB's second answer; TB first derives it from the senses of 2152).
- The l of
bhū + l is the sthānin for everything that follows. - 2154 tiptasjhisipthasthamibvasmas tātāṃjhathāsāthāṃdhvamiḍvahimahiṅ 3.4.78 — the eighteen substitutes of l: tip tas jhi / sip thas tha / mip vas mas, and ta ātām jha / thās āthām dhvam / iṭ vahi mahiṅ.
- iṭ here is a substitute, not an augment; its ṭ serves iṭo 't (3.4.106, SK 2257) (TB). The ṅ of mahiṅ marks the whole set, giving the pratyāhāras taṅ and tiṅ (TB). The p of tip etc. keeps them from being ṅit by sārvadhātukam apit (1.2.4, SK 2234) (BM).
bhū + l → one of these eighteen. Groups B and C choose which.
I.B. Which nine: parasmaipada or ātmanepada — running example: bhū + l → bhū + (tip … mas)
- 2155 laḥ parasmaipadam 1.4.99 — all substitutes of l are parasmaipada. "lādeśa" means substitutes taught for l as such, so sic and the like are not parasmaipada (NSP fn).
- 2156 taṅānāv ātmanepadam 1.4.100 — taṅ (the nine from ta to mahiṅ) and āna are ātmanepada. This is an exception to 2155, so parasmaipada is left with the nine tip … mas (BM).
- āna = śānac and kānac only, the āna that replace l. So cānaś (3.2.129, SK 3109) still comes after a parasmaipadin: nighnānāḥ (BM, TB).
- 2157 anudāttaṅita ātmanepadam 1.3.12 — after a root with an anudātta vowel as it, or ending in something ṅit in upadeśa, ātmanepada. "upadeśe" goes with ṅit only; "ending in" (tadantavidhi) also goes with ṅit only.
- dhātoḥ comes by maṇḍūkapluti from bhūvādayo dhātavaḥ (1.3.1, SK 18) per BM; TB says it is implied (ākṣepa) by "ātmanepada".
- Commentators' examples: upadeśe kim? cukuṭiṣati (ṅit only by extension); tadantavidhi gives bobhūyate (yaṅ). bhū has neither marker.
- 2158 svaritañitaḥ kartrabhiprāye kriyāphale 1.3.72 — after a root with a svarita vowel or ñ as it, ātmanepada when the fruit of the action goes to the agent.
- BM: in hotā yājyayā yajati the fruit (heaven) goes to the yajamāna, not the hotṛ, so there is no ātmanepada. bhū has neither marker.
- 2159 śeṣāt kartari parasmaipadam 1.3.78 — after any other root (no ātmanepada condition), parasmaipada in the kartṛ sense.
- BM: this is the rule that gives bhū parasmaipada:
bhū + l → bhū + (tip … mas). Which of the nine is still open, which is why the names of C follow.
I.C. Which ending: person and number — running example: bhū + (tip … mas) → bhū + ti
- 2160 tiṅas trīṇi trīṇi prathamamadhyamottamāḥ 1.4.101 — in each pada (parasmaipadam and ātmanepadam carried from 2155–2156), the triads are prathama, madhyama, uttama. Six triads and three names would defeat yathāsaṃkhya without "ubhayoḥ padayoḥ" (BM, TB).
- tip tas jhi = prathama; sip thas tha = madhyama; mip vas mas = uttama.
- 2161 tāny ekavacanadvivacanabahuvacanāny ekaśaḥ 1.4.102 — within each triad, one by one, ekavacana, dvivacana, bahuvacana. dvyekayor dvivacanaikavacane (1.4.22, SK 186) and bahuṣu bahuvacanam (1.4.21, SK 187) then pick by number (BM).
- tip = prathama ekavacana.
- 2162 yuṣmady upapade samānādhikaraṇe sthāniny api madhyamaḥ 1.4.105 — madhyama when yuṣmad has the same referent as the l ("laḥ" from 2155, BM), used or only understood.
tvaṃ bhavasi; unused, BM's rāma pāhi. Not in tvāṃ paśyati, where yuṣmad does not denote the kāraka of the tiṅ (TB).- 2163 prahāse ca manyopapade manyater uttama ekavac ca 1.4.106 — in mockery, two statements (BM):
- a root with man as upapada takes the madhyama where asmad is meant (asmadi supplied from 2164);
- man itself takes the uttama, and in the singular, where yuṣmad is meant.
- The examples come at 2170, once the laṭ forms exist:
ehi manye odanaṃ bhokṣyase (for manyase … bhokṣye). - 2164 asmady uttamaḥ 1.4.107 — uttama when asmad has the same referent, used or not (the conditions of 2162 carried):
ahaṃ bhavāmi. - 2165 śeṣe prathamaḥ 1.4.108 — elsewhere (outside 2162–2164), prathama.
- BM: in tvam ahaṃ ca pacāvaḥ the uttama wins by paratva; in devadattas tvaṃ ca pacatha the case is not a remainder.
- The kaumudī then sets the model: bhū (1) sattāyām. kartṛ intended → laṭ; parasmaipada (no ātmanepada condition); prathama (no co-referent yuṣmad or asmad); tip (one agent):
bhū + ti.
I.D. laṭ of bhū: bhavati … bhavāmaḥ — running example: bhū + ti → bhū + a + ti → bhavati
- 2166 tiṅśit sārvadhātukam 3.4.113 — tiṅ and śit affixes taught under dhātoḥ are sārvadhātuka. The dhātoḥ condition keeps the case-ending śas of harīn out (BM, TB).
- The ti of bhū + ti is sārvadhātuka, and so is śap once added.
- 2167 kartari śap 3.1.68 — śap after a root before a sārvadhātuka denoting the agent ("sārvadhātuke" from 3.1.67, SK 2756; dhātoḥ from 3.1.22, SK 2629). ś and p are it, so only a remains:
bhū + a + ti. - NSP fn: "kartari" is for the following rules, since in bhāva/karman yak blocks śap anyway. The name vikaraṇa is the earlier teachers' (BM).
- 2168 sārvadhātukārdhadhātukayoḥ 7.3.84 — guṇa of the final ik of an aṅga before a sārvadhātuka or ārdhadhātuka (guṇaḥ from 7.3.82, SK 2346; ikaḥ by 1.1.3, SK 34).
- The ū of bhū, before śap: ū → o, then av for o before a vowel:
bhavati; bhavataḥ (tas). - 2169 jho 'ntaḥ 7.1.3 — jh of an affix → ant ("pratyaya" carried from 7.1.2, SK 475, but not "ādi").
bhava + jhi → bhava + anti, then ato guṇe (6.1.97, SK 191) gives pararūpa: bhavanti. - ato dīrgho yañi does not lengthen before ant: sthānivadbhāva is barred for a rule conditioned by a single sound (TB).
- Also
bhavasi, bhavathaḥ, bhavatha. - 2170 ato dīrgho yañi 7.3.101 — the a of an a-final aṅga is lengthened before a sārvadhātuka beginning with yañ ("sārvadhātuke" from 7.3.95, SK 2444). bhava counts as the aṅga by "tadādi" (BM).
bhava + mi → bhavāmi; bhavāvaḥ, bhavāmaḥ. The kaumudī then pairs the forms with pronouns: sa bhavati … vayaṃ bhavāmaḥ.- 2163's examples:
ehi manye odanaṃ bhokṣyase, bhuktaḥ so 'tithibhiḥ, a jest to a latecomer. bhuj takes the madhyama for the due uttama; man takes the uttama singular for the due madhyama (BM). etam eta vā manye odanaṃ bhokṣyethe / bhokṣyadhve is two sentences (TB). - Counter-examples:
etu bhavān manyate … (the yuṣmad condition is carried, and bhavat is not yuṣmad); ehi manyase … bhokṣye (a plain statement, no jest).
I.E. liṭ: ārdhadhātuka endings and vuk — running example: bhū + liṭ → bhū + ṇal → bhū + a → bhūv + a
- 2171 parokṣe liṭ 3.2.115 — liṭ for a sense that is past (bhūte heading, 3.2.84, SK 2995), not of today ("anadyatane" from 3.2.111, SK 2205) and beyond perception. Then l → tip etc.
- "Today" = the day with the last watch of the past night and the first of the coming one (Kaiyaṭa, cited by BM). On parokṣa, BM and TB differ (see above).
- 2172 liṭ ca 3.4.115 — the tiṅ of liṭ is ārdhadhātuka only (tiṅ from 2166; ārdhadhātukam from 2187; eva from 3.4.111, SK 2463). So no śap: the base stays bare
bhū. - 2173 parasmaipadānāṃ ṇalatususthalathusaṇalvamāḥ 3.4.82 — the parasmaipada endings of liṭ ("liṭaḥ" from 3.4.81, SK 2241) become, respectively, ṇal atus us / thal athus a / ṇal va ma.
- tip → ṇal, which replaces the whole: it is not yet an affix when cuṭū would apply (BM). So
bhū + a. - 2174 bhuvo vug luṅliṭoḥ 6.4.88 — bhū takes vuk before a vowel of luṅ or liṭ ("aci" from 6.4.77, SK 271):
bhū + a → bhūv + a. - vuk is nitya, so it blocks the guṇa of 7.3.84 (SK 2168) and the vṛddhi of aco ñṇiti (7.2.115, SK 254).
- Counter-example: abhūt (luṅ, no vowel follows) (BM, TB).
I.F. Reduplication, and the rest of liṭ: babhūva … babhūvima — running example: bhūv a → bhūv bhūv a → bhu bhūv a → babhūva
- 2175 ekāco dve prathamasya 6.1.1 — heading: two utterances of the first single-vowelled unit. The sūtra has no kaumudī of its own.
- With 2176 it is only a heading ("ity adhikṛtya"), since as a rule it would overreach. It runs up to, not including, ṣyaṅaḥ saṃprasāraṇam… (6.1.13, SK 1003) (BM).
- "dve" = uccāraṇe: doubling here is repetition (dviḥprayoga), not substitution (BM, from the Bhāṣya).
- 2176 ajāder dvitīyasya 6.1.2 — heading, with 2175: in a root beginning with a vowel, the second ekāc, the one after the initial vowel.
- ajādeḥ is the fifth case of the karmadhāraya "the initial ac". Read as a bahuvrīhi, na ndrāḥ… would wrongly block indidrīyiṣati (BM, TB). "ekāc" is supplied (śeṣa, BM).
- It does no work on bhū, which begins with a consonant.
- 2177 liṭi dhātor anabhyāsasya 6.1.8 — before liṭ, the first ekāc part of the dhātu, that part not being an abhyāsa, is uttered twice. The part reading is BM's and is the audit-corrected one. "anabhyāsa" stops a second doubling when san follows a yaṅanta or ṇic-caṅ follows a sannanta (BM).
- bhūv a has four ekācs: bhū, ūv, ū and the whole bhūv. The whole is doubled (Bhāṣya; vyapadeśivadbhāva):
bhūv bhūv a. - 2178 pūrvo 'bhyāsaḥ 6.1.4 — the former of the two (in the ekāco dve section, not sarvasya dve) is abhyāsa: bhūv bhūv a.
- 2179 halādiḥ śeṣaḥ 7.4.60 — in the abhyāsa ("abhyāsasya" from 7.4.58, SK 2620) only the initial consonant remains. The v of the abhyāsa bhūv goes:
bhū bhūv a. - 2180 hrasvaḥ 7.4.59 — the abhyāsa's vowel (acaḥ by 1.2.28, SK 35) is shortened:
bhu bhūv a. - 2181 bhavater aḥ 7.4.73 — before liṭ ("liṭi" from 7.4.68, SK 2353), a replaces the u of bhū's abhyāsa (the final, by alo 'ntyasya):
bha bhūv a. - It holds in bhāva and karman too: bibharāṃbabhūve (TB against the prāc).
- 2182 abhyāse car ca 8.4.54 — in the abhyāsa, jhal → car, and (ca) jaś, by nearest match: jhaś → jaś, khay → car ("jhalām" from 8.4.53, SK 52).
- The bh of bha is jhaś → b:
babhūva. - NSP fn: operations on the abhyāsa do not block one another, so 2179 and 2181 apply together.
- 2183 asiddhavad atrābhāt 6.4.22 — heading. From śnān nalopaḥ (6.4.23, SK 2544) to the end of 6.4 (up to and including the bha section, 6.4.129, SK 233), one ābhīya operation is asiddha for another ābhīya with the same basis.
- The problem: vuk (6.4.88) is ābhīya, so it is asiddha for uvaṅ (6.4.77, SK 271), also ābhīya. uvaṅ of the ū plus guṇa of the light penultimate would give \*babhova.
- Vārttika vugyuṭāv uvaṅyaṇoḥ siddhau vaktavyau: vuk counts as done for uvaṅ (and yuṭ for yaṇ), so uvaṅ has no ū before a vowel:
babhūva, babhūvatuḥ, babhūvuḥ. - Asiddha operation (BM) or asiddha rule (TB): see above.
- 2184 ārdhadhātukasyeḍ valādeḥ 7.2.35 — an ārdhadhātuka beginning with val takes the augment iṭ.
- th of thal:
babhūvitha; athus is vowel-initial: babhūvathuḥ; a: babhūva. - uttama: ṇal
babhūva; va, ma take iṭ: babhūviva, babhūvima. - śryukaḥ kiti (7.2.11, SK 2381) does not bar iṭ: the krādiniyama of 7.2.13 (SK 2293) gives iṭ in liṭ to all other roots (BM, TB). Counter-example: jugupsati (the san of 3.1.5 is not taught under dhātoḥ) (BM).
I.G. The two futures: luṭ bhavitā …, lṛṭ bhaviṣyati … — running example: bhū + tās + ti → bhū + i + tās + ḍā → bhavit ā → bhavitā
- 2185 anadyatane luṭ 3.3.15 — luṭ for a future not of today ("bhaviṣyati" from 3.3.3, SK 3171).
bhū + tip. - 2186 syatāsī lṛluṭoḥ 3.1.33 — sya before lṛ (both lṛṭ and lṛṅ), tāsi before luṭ, respectively (NSP fn). This is an exception to śap:
bhū + tās + ti. - 2187 ārdhadhātukaṃ śeṣaḥ 3.4.114 — any other affix taught under dhātoḥ is ārdhadhātuka. The san of 3.1.5 is not so taught, so there is no iṭ in jugupsate (BM, TB).
- tās is ārdhadhātuka and val-initial, so it takes iṭ by 2184:
bhū + i + tās + ti. - 2188 luṭaḥ prathamasya ḍāraurasaḥ 2.4.85 — the prathama endings of luṭ → ḍā, rau, ras.
- ti → ḍā. Because ḍā is ḍit, the ṭi (ās) of tās is dropped by ṭeḥ (6.4.143, SK 316) though tās is not bha. With guṇa and av:
bhavit ā. - 2189 pugantalaghūpadhasya ca 7.3.86 — guṇa of the ik of an aṅga ending in puk or with a light penultimate, before a sārvadhātuka or ārdhadhātuka.
- It works across the one sound that must intervene (yena nāvyavadhānam), not more: no guṇa in bhinatti.
- In
bhavit ā the i of iṭ is the light penultimate, and ā is sārvadhātuka by sthānivadbhāva. So guṇa is due (BM). - 2190 dīdhīvevīṭām 1.1.6 — no guṇa or vṛddhi for dīdhī, vevī and iṭ ("na" from 1.1.4, SK 2656). This iṭ is the augment only (NSP fn). So the i stays:
bhavitā. - 2191 tāsastyor lopaḥ 7.4.50 — tās and as lose [their s] before an s-initial affix ("si" from 7.4.49, SK 2342; tadādividhi):
bhavitās + si → bhavitāsi. - 2192 ri ca 7.4.51 — tās does the same before an r-initial affix (as is excluded, since no such affix can follow it: BM "asaṃbhavāt"):
bhavitārau, bhavitāraḥ. - The rest of the paradigm:
bhavitāsi, bhavitāsthaḥ, bhavitāstha; bhavitāsmi, bhavitāsvaḥ, bhavitāsmaḥ. - 2193 lṛṭ śeṣe ca 3.3.13 — lṛṭ for the future, both without a purposive action (the remainder left by tumunṇvulau… 3.3.10, SK 3175) and, by "ca", with one.
- sya (2186), iṭ (2184), guṇa, av, and ṣ by ādeśapratyayayoḥ (8.3.59, SK 212):
bhaviṣyati, bhaviṣyataḥ, bhaviṣyanti; bhaviṣyasi …; bhaviṣyāmi (lengthening by 2170) …. - BM calls Haradatta's view that "śeṣe ca" could be dropped questionable (cintya): then tumun would block lṛṭ in śayiṣyata iti sthīyate.
I.H. loṭ: bhavatu … bhavāma — running example: bhava + ti → bhavatu; bhava + hi → bhava; bhava + ā + ni → bhavāni
- 2194 loṭ ca 3.3.162 — loṭ in the senses vidhi etc., carried from 3.3.161 (SK 2208, defined there) (TB).
- 2195 āśiṣi liṅloṭau 3.3.173 — liṅ and loṭ also in benediction (āśīḥ = the wish to obtain what is desired, BM). The sūtra has no kaumudī.
- TB: āśīḥ is not simply added to 3.3.161's list because "āśiṣi" is needed here for the next rule (3.3.174, SK 3313).
- 2196 eruḥ 3.4.86 — the i of loṭ → u:
bhava + ti → bhavatu. No commentator comments on it. - 2197 tuhyos tātaṅ āśiṣy anyatarasyām 7.1.35 — in benediction, tu and hi → tāt (tātaṅ), optionally.
- It replaces the whole by anekālśit sarvasya (1.1.55, SK 45), not the final alone by ṅic ca (1.1.53, SK 43). ṅic ca has already served in anaṅ, where the ṅ has no other use. Here the ṅ has other work (barring guṇa, vṛddhi, saṃprasāraṇa), so ṅic ca applies "sluggishly" and the later rule wins.
bhavatāt. BM's uses of the ṅ: dviṣṭāt, stutāt, uṣṭāt, brūtāt.- 2198 loṭo laṅvat 3.4.85 — the operations taught in place of laṅ apply to loṭ: tām etc. (2199) and s-loss (2200).
- aṭ (2206) is not extended, because it is taught for the aṅga when laṅ follows, not in place of laṅ (BM, TB).
- 2199 tasthasthamipāṃ tāṃtaṃtāmaḥ 3.4.101 — for a ṅit lakāra ("ṅitaḥ" from 2200), tas → tām, thas → tam, tha → ta, mip → am, respectively.
- Via 2198:
bhava + tas → bhavatām; later bhavatam, bhavata. - 2200 nityaṃ ṅitaḥ 3.4.99 — the s-final uttama ending of a ṅit lakāra always loses its s ("saḥ uttamasya" from 3.4.98, SK 3428; lopaḥ from 3.4.97, SK 3426). It is placed here incidentally (BM); it works in bhavāva, bhavāma (2204).
- The kaumudī gives here
bhavatām (by 2199) and bhavantu (jhi → anti, i → u by 2196). - TB: it is "uttama of a ṅit lakāra", not "the s of …", or it would overreach to bhūyāsam.
- 2201 ser hy apic ca 3.4.87 — sip of loṭ → hi, and hi is not pit. So it is ṅit by sārvadhātukam apit (1.2.4, SK 2234), and stuhi gets no guṇa (BM).
bhava + hi. - 2202 ato heḥ 6.4.105 — hi after a undergoes luk ("luk" from 6.4.104, SK 2329):
bhava. bhavatāt: in benediction tātaṅ (2197) comes instead, being para to the luk (BM, TB, NSP fn). Also bhavatam, bhavata.- 2203 mer niḥ 3.4.89 — the mi of loṭ → ni, pre-empting the am of 2199 (BM):
bhava + ni. - 2204 āḍ uttamasya pic ca 3.4.92 — an uttama ending of loṭ takes the augment āṭ, which is pit.
bhava + ā + ni → bhavāni; bhava + ā + va(s), with the s lost by 2200: bhavāva; bhavāma.- The i of hi and ni is not turned to u by eruḥ, nor lost by itaś ca through laṅvadbhāva, "by the force of uttering i" (else Pāṇini would have said hu, nu, mo na) (BM).
- On "saḥ": BM takes it as the augment; TB as that to which āṭ is added.
I.I. laṅ: abhavat … abhavāma — running example: bhava + ti → a + bhava + ti → abhavat
- 2205 anadyatane laṅ 3.2.111 — laṅ for a past not of today (dhātoḥ, bhūte in force).
- NSP fn: anadyatana is a bahuvrīhi, so where today is included only luṅ is used.
- 2206 luṅlaṅlṛṅkṣv aḍ udāttaḥ 6.4.71 — before luṅ, laṅ, lṛṅ the aṅga takes the udātta augment aṭ. tip, śap, guṇa and av come first, so aṭ attaches to the aṅga with its vikaraṇa (BM):
a + bhava + ti. - 2207 itaś ca 3.4.100 — an i-final parasmaipada ending of a ṅit lakāra loses its i (lopaḥ and parasmaipadeṣu from 3.4.97, SK 3426; ṅitaḥ from 2200):
abhavati → abhavat. - The paradigm:
abhavat, abhavatām, abhavan; abhavaḥ, abhavatam, abhavata; abhavam, abhavāva, abhavāma. tām/tam/ta/am come by 2199 and the s-loss by 2200. - TB: the prāc's "loss of i in the parasmaipada" overreaches to bhavet.
I.J. vidhiliṅ: bhavet … bhavema — running example: bhava + yās + s + t → bhava + yā + t → bhava + iy + t → bhavet
- 2208 vidhinimantraṇāmantraṇādhīṣṭasaṃpraśnaprārthaneṣu liṅ 3.3.161 — liṅ when these senses are made known (dyotya) or expressed (vācya):
- vidhi: prompting an inferior, such as a servant;
- nimantraṇa: engaging someone in what is binding, e.g. a daughter's son at a śrāddha;
- āmantraṇa: permission to act as one pleases;
- adhīṣṭa: prompting with respect;
- saṃpraśna: deliberation (BM; NSP fn); prārthana: begging (BM, TB).
- The first four could be "pravartanā"; they are listed separately for elaboration. Both dyotya and vācya views are kept; TB prefers dyotaka.
- 2209 yāsuṭ parasmaipadeṣūdātto ṅic ca 3.4.103 — parasmaipada endings of liṅ ("liṅaḥ" from 3.4.102, SK 2255) take the augment yāsuṭ, which is udātta and ṅit.
- The ṅit statement is a jñāpaka: analvidhau (1.1.56, SK 49) sometimes bars even marker operations; the ś of śānac (3.1.83, SK 2557) is a second indication.
- With i lost by itaś ca:
bhava + yās + t. - 2210 suṭ tithoḥ 3.4.107 — the t and th of liṅ take suṭ. The later suṭ does not block yāsuṭ: yāsuṭ is an augment of liṅ, suṭ of t/th, so their domains differ (BM).
bhava + yās + s + t. - 2211 liṅaḥ salopo 'nantyasya 7.2.79 — in a sārvadhātuka liṅ ("sārvadhātuke" from 7.2.76, SK 2474), a non-final s is lost. Both s's go, since suṭ belongs to liṅ as a part of its part (TB):
bhava + yā + t. - The s of suṭ is heard in the āśīrliṅ, which is not sārvadhātuka (bhūyāstām), and more distinctly in the ātmanepada (edhiṣīṣṭa).
- BM takes the two losses as simultaneous; NSP fn as successive.
- 2212 ato yeyaḥ 7.2.80 — yā of a sārvadhātuka after short a → iy.
bhava + iy + t, then ādguṇaḥ (6.1.87, SK 69) gives bhavey t, then lopo vyor vali (6.1.66, SK 873) drops the y: bhavet; also bhavetām.- Why "sārvadhātuka"? Without it, cikīrṣ-a + yāt (āśīrliṅ) would get iy (\*cikīrṣet). By the madhye 'pavāda maxim the rule would block only ato lopaḥ (6.4.48, SK 2308), while in bhavet lengthening (2170) would win as para.
- 2213 jher jus 3.4.108 — jhi of liṅ → jus (the whole; j is it):
bhava + yā + us. - 2214 usy apadāntāt 6.1.96 — a non-pada-final a-vowel + the u of us → pararūpa.
- In bhava + yā + us, pararūpa is due. The prācīnas say iy (2212) wins, being para and nitya.
- Bhaṭṭoji: pararūpa is antaraṅga, so read 2212 as "ataḥ yās iyaḥ", iy for yās. [Print: "so iy is the exception to the s-loss; in 'ato yeyaḥ' the sandhi is ārṣa".] Result:
bhaveyuḥ. - The rest:
bhaveḥ, bhavetam, bhaveta; bhaveyam, bhaveva, bhavema.
I.K. āśīrliṅ: bhūyāt … bhūyāsma — running example: bhū + yās + s + t → bhūyāt
- 2215 liṅāśiṣi 3.4.116 — in benediction, the tiṅ of liṅ is ārdhadhātuka only ("eva", TB). So there is no śap (the base stays bhū), and the sārvadhātuka rules 2211–2212 do not apply.
- 2216 kid āśiṣi 3.4.104 — in benediction the yāsuṭ of liṅ is kit, an exception to its ṅit status from 2209.
- kit does work ṅit could not: saṃprasāraṇa in ijyāt, and guṇa in jāgaryāt (TB).
bhū + yās + s + t: both s's are lost by skoḥ saṃyogādyor ante ca (8.2.29, SK 380), as conjunct-initials at the pada end, giving bhūyāt. BM and TB argue over which clause removes the yāsuṭ s in bhūyāstām etc.- 2217 kṅiti ca 1.1.5 — guṇa and vṛddhi taught by naming ik do not occur when caused by something git, kit or ṅit ("na" from 1.1.4, SK 2656).
- yāsuṭ is kit, so the ū of bhū takes no guṇa:
bhūyāt, bhūyāstām, bhūyāsuḥ; bhūyāḥ, bhūyāstam, bhūyāsta; bhūyāsam, bhūyāsva, bhūyāsma. - The g (by praśleṣa) serves jiṣṇuḥ (gsnu). "ik-defined" spares laigavāyanaḥ (BM, TB).
I.L. luṅ introduced — running example: bhū + luṅ → (abhūt, SK 2221 ff., next part)
- 2218 luṅ 3.2.110 — luṅ after a root with a past sense (dhātoḥ, bhūte in force; BM). No forms are given here: cli, sic and the luk of sic follow from 2219 on. (For the orchestrator: this group can merge into part 2's luṅ group.)
Part II — SK 2219–2286: luṅ/lṛṅ of bhū, the edh paradigm, liṭ by ām, the anudātta and ṣ/ṇ-initial roots
Covers SK 2219–2286 (68 sūtras): all present.
Contents (this part)
- A. 2219–2229: the rest of bhū. luṅ (abhūt, abhūvan), luṅ/laṅ after mā (sma) without aṭ, and lṛṅ (abhaviṣyat).
- B. 2230–2232: upasargas stand before the root, and ṇ in āni and in ni (prabhavāṇi, praṇibhavati/pranibhavati). The edh series opens.
- C. 2233–2236: laṭ ātmanepada of edh: edhate, edhete, edhase, edhe.
- D. 2237–2240: liṭ by the ām-periphrasis. edhām + kṛ/bhū/as, and kṛ takes ātmanepada as edh does.
- E. 2241–2247: the auxiliary kṛ in liṭ (kṛ + e → cakre): edhāṃcakre, edhāṃcakṛṣe, edhāṃcakṛḍhve, and edhāmbabhūva.
- F. 2248–2250: edhām āsa, then luṭ and lṛṭ: edhitā, edhitādhve, edhitāhe, edhiṣyate.
- G. 2251–2253: loṭ: edhatām, edhasva, edhadhvam, edhai.
- H. 2254–2258: laṅ, vidhiliṅ, āśīrliṅ, luṅ and lṛṅ of edh (aidhata, edheta, edhiṣīṣṭa, aidhiṣata, aidhiṣyata), then the list of anudātta roots.
- I. 2259–2263: liṭ of spardh, dadh, skud and dad. The khay after a śar is kept, e comes with loss of the abhyāsa, num is added, and the blockers of the e-rule.
- J. 2264–2265: root-initial ṣ → s, and ū in urd. The ṣopadeśa verse. The anudātteta roots end and at opens the parasmaipadins.
- K. 2266–2269: luṅ of seṭ parasmaipadins: ātīt, (mā) atīt, acetīt, acyutat/acyotīt.
- L. 2270–2278: ṣ for s after upasargas: niṣedhati, nyaṣedhat, niṣiṣedha. Not in gaṅgāṃ visedhati.
- M. 2279–2281: ṣidhū with and without iṭ: siṣeddha/siṣedhitha, seddhā, asaitsīt, asaiddhām.
- N. 2282–2284: vṛddhi of a penultimate a: cakhāda/cakhada, akhādīt/akhadīt, babāda/bedatuḥ.
- O. 2285–2286: ṇ for the n of ni before gad and the rest (praṇigadati), and root-initial ṇ → n.
Order: SK order throughout. The Aṣṭādhyāyī order jumps constantly here (3.3 → 3.1 → 2.4 → 7.3 …), because Bhaṭṭoji brings in each rule where the bhū/edh paradigms first need it.
II.A. The rest of bhū: luṅ (with and without māṅ) and lṛṅ — running example: bhū + luṅ → a-bhū-s-t → abhūt; abhūvan; mā bhavān bhūt; abhaviṣyat
- 2219 māṅi luṅ 3.3.175 — when māṅ is used, luṅ follows the root. This is an exception to all the lakāras (sarvalakārāpavāda). luṅ (SK 2218) alone gives only the past (BM).
- The mā of mā 'stu is a different, prohibitive indeclinable (BM, TB). This rule feeds
mā bhavān bhūt (2228). - 2220 smottare laṅ ca 3.3.176 — when māṅ has sma after it, laṅ comes. "ca" draws in (anukṛṣṭa) māṅi luṅ, so luṅ comes too.
- No example here. The forms are given at 2228:
mā sma bhavat (laṅ) or mā sma bhūt (luṅ). - 2221 cli luṅi 3.1.43 — before luṅ the root takes cli. It is an exception to śap, śyan and the other vikaraṇas (BM, TB):
bhū + cli + t. - 2222 cleḥ sic 3.1.44 — sic replaces cli; i and c are it:
bhū + s + t. - The i-marker keeps the penultimate from being lost in amaṃsta, and the c-marker is for the cit accent (BM, TB).
- 2223 gātisthāghupābhūbhyaḥ sicaḥ parasmaipadeṣu 2.4.77 — luk of sic after gā, sthā, the ghu roots, pā and bhū when a parasmaipada ending follows.
- "luk" is carried forward from SK 1276. "ślu" is not carried forward (vyākhyāna; BM, TB).
- gā is the substitute of iṇ, and pā is the pā that takes piba (BM, TB).
a-bhū-s-t → a-bhū-t, with aṭ added by SK 2206. Whether guṇa applies is the next question (BM).- 2224 bhūsuvos tiṅi 7.3.88 — there is no guṇa of bhū and sū before a sārvadhātuka tiṅ. guṇa is carried forward from SK 2346; na and sārvadhātuke from SK 2503.
- sū here is only the adādi ṣūṅ. With śa or śyan the vikaraṇa stands between root and tiṅ (BM, TB).
- With sic gone, t follows bhū directly:
abhūt, not *abhot. - 2225 astisico 'pṛkte 7.3.96 — an apṛkta hal takes īṭ when it comes after a sic or an as that is still present (vidyamāna). īṭ is carried forward from SK 2452; hal from SK 2443, recast as a sixth case.
- Analysis: sic + as form a samāhāra-dvandva, which is in karmadhāraya with the avyaya asti. The bhatva of sic is sautra, so neither kutva nor jaśtva applies (TB).
- In
abhūt the sic has been elided, so there is no īṭ. - Why "hal"? aidhiṣi. Why "apṛkta"? aidhiṣṭa. Also
abhūtām. - 2226 sijabhyastavidibhyaś ca 3.4.109 — jus replaces jhi of a ṅit lakāra after sic, after an abhyasta and after vid. By pratyayalakṣaṇa of the elided sic it would reach bhū's third plural. The next rule answers that.
- 2227 ātaḥ 3.4.110 — when sic has luk, jus comes only after an ā-final aṅga. It is a restriction (niyama), since 2226 already gives jus.
- TB grounds it in the anuvṛtti of sic; BM in the Bhāṣya vārttika ātaḥ sijlugantād.
- bhū is not ā-final, so jh → ant:
a-bhū-v-an → abhūvan, with vuk by SK 2174 (BM). - The rest of the paradigm: abhūḥ, abhūtam, abhūta, abhūvam, abhūva, abhūma.
- 2228 na māṅyoge 6.4.74 — no aṭ or āṭ when the verb is construed with māṅ. The two augments are carried forward from SK 2206 and 2254 (BM). Examples:
mā bhavān bhūt; mā sma bhavat / mā sma bhūt. - 2229 liṅnimitte lṛṅ kriyātipattau 3.3.139 — where a cause of liṅ (such as hetuhetumadbhāva) is present, lṛṅ comes in the future sense when the action is understood as not accomplished. The future sense is carried forward from SK 2794.
a-bhū-sya-t → abhaviṣyat: sya by SK 2186, then iṭ, guṇa + av, and ṣ (BM).- BM's example: suvṛṣṭiś ced abhaviṣyat tadā subhikṣam abhaviṣyat.
- The kaumudī gives all nine forms, abhaviṣyat … abhaviṣyāma. The English follows the print's abhaviṣyatām; our digital text has a slip here.
II.B. The upasarga before the root, and ṇ in āni and ni — running example: pra + bhavāni → prabhavāṇi; pra-ni-bhavati → praṇibhavati / pranibhavati
- 2230 te prāg dhātoḥ 1.4.80 — words designated gati and upasarga are used only before the root. They may not stand after it or be separated from it (BM, TB); hence the Vedic SK 3391–3392. So pra comes before bhavāni.
- 2231 āni loṭ 8.4.16 — the n of āni (loṭ uttama singular) → ṇ after an r or ṣ that stands in an upasarga. naḥ and ṇaḥ are carried forward from SK 235, upasargāt from SK 2287. The rule is needed because the two are in different padas (BM).
pra + bhavāni → prabhavāṇi. The bh a v ā in between is allowed by SK 197.- Vārttika: dur is not an upasarga for ṣatva or ṇatva:
duḥsthitiḥ, durbhavāni. - Vārttika: antar is an upasarga for aṅ, ki and ṇatva:
antardhā (aṅ), antardhiḥ (ki), antarbhavāṇi. - 2232 śeṣe vibhāṣā 'kakhādāv aṣānta upadeśe 8.4.18 — before any other root (not gada and the rest of SK 2285), except one that begins with k or kh or ends in ṣ in upadeśa, the n of ni after an upasarga r or ṣ optionally → ṇ:
praṇibhavati / pranibhavati. - "vibhāṣā" is needed because saṃhitā is obligatory between upasarga and root. Hari's verse: saṃhitaikapade nityā….
- The meanings in the dhātupāṭha (bhū sattāyām) are only indicative (upalakṣaṇa). Upasargas manifest (dyotaka) a meaning: prabhavati, parābhavati, saṃbhavati …; prahāra, āhāra, saṃhāra ….
- Then comes root (2) edha vṛddhau, which opens the 36 anudātteta ātmanepadins that run up to kattha.
II.C. laṭ ātmanepada of edh — running example: edh + śap + ta → edha + ta → edhate
- 2233 ṭita ātmanepadānāṃ ṭer e 3.4.79 — the ṭi of the ātmanepada substitutes of a ṭ-marked lakāra → e. lasya is the heading (SK 2153).
edha + ta: the ṭi is the a of ta, so a → e: edhate.- "ātmanepada" here means the taṅ endings only, not āna, so pacamānaḥ keeps its a (BM, TB; the p44 audit reading).
- 2234 sārvadhātukam apit 1.2.4 — a sārvadhātuka that is not pit is treated as ṅit (ṅidvat). ṅit is carried forward from SK 2461. So ātām counts as ṅit for 2235.
- 2235 āto ṅitaḥ 7.2.81 — after a short a, iy replaces the ā of a ṅit affix (ataḥ and iyaḥ come from SK 2212).
edha + āte → edha + iy + te; ād guṇaḥ, then y is lost by lopo vyor vali: edhete (BM, Wikisource witness).edhante: jh → ant, pararūpa, and e for the ṭi (BM).- 2236 thāsas se 3.4.80 — se replaces thās of a ṭit lakāra:
edha + thās → edhase; also edhethe, edhadhve. - Uttama singular: iṭ → e. In
edha + e, vṛddhi (vṛddhir eci) would displace ād guṇaḥ, but ato guṇe (SK 191) gives pararūpa: edhe (TB). Also edhāvahe, edhāmahe.
II.D. liṭ by the ām-periphrasis — running example: edh + liṭ → edh-ām + [luk of liṭ] + kṛ-liṭ → edhāṃcakre
- 2237 ijādeś ca gurumato 'nṛcchaḥ 3.1.36 — a root that begins with an ic and has a heavy vowel, other than ṛcch, takes ām in liṭ. dhātoḥ is carried forward from SK 2629; ām and liṭi from SK 2306.
- edh begins with e, an ic, which is heavy:
edh + ām. - The m of ām is not it. The proof (jñāpaka) is ām after ās and kās: if m were it, the ā would merge into the root.
- 2238 āmaḥ 2.4.81 — luk of the l-affix after ām:
edhām + liṭ → edhām. luk is carried forward from SK 1276. - On the p44 audit reading: BM first names leḥ from SK 3402, but concludes that it need not be carried forward (pariśeṣa); the kaumudī's "leḥ" only spells out the sense. TB sets leḥ aside as the Kāśikā's reading.
- 2239 kṛñ cānuprayujyate liṭi 3.1.40 — after the ām-form, kṛ, bhū and as, followed by liṭ, are applied after it, immediately: never before it and never separated from it (BM, TB).
- kṛñ is a pratyāhāra, from kṛbhvastiyoge (SK 2117) to the ñ of kṛño dvitīya… (SK 2129). sampadi falls inside it but is excluded, because its meaning cannot be construed.
- The auxiliary gives the general action and the ām-base the particular one; the two are construed as non-different (abhedānvaya):
edhām + kṛ + liṭ. - 2240 āmpratyayavat kṛño 'nuprayogasya 1.3.63 — the after-applied kṛñ takes ātmanepada as its ām-base does. āmpratyaya is an atadguṇasaṃvijñāna bahuvrīhi, so it means the root without ām. edh is ātmanepadin, so
edhāṃ + kṛ + ta. - pūrvavat is carried forward from SK 2734 and read as a separate sentence (vākyabheda): kṛñ takes only what its base takes. So indāṃcakāra has no taṅ even when the fruit goes to the agent.
II.E. The auxiliary kṛ in liṭ — running example: kṛ + ta → kṛ + e → kṛ kṛ e → ka kṛ e → ca kṛ e → cakre (edhāṃcakre)
- 2241 liṭas tajhayor eśirec 3.4.81 — eś and irec replace the ta and jha of liṭ. The ś makes each a whole substitute (BM, TB).
kṛ + ta → kṛ + e; jha → irec gives edhāṃcakrire.- The e is pronounced as a jñāpaka: the ṭi-e of 2233 does not reach substitutes of taṅ, so the ḍā, rau, ras of luṭ keep their ṭi.
- 2242 asaṃyogāl liṭ kit 1.2.5 — a non-pit liṭ after a non-conjunct is kit (apit is carried forward from 2234). So kṛ takes no guṇa (kṅiti ca, SK 2217).
- yaṇ (ṛ → r) now threatens before doubling, and it would win because it comes later (para) (BM). TB's counterexample for "asaṃyogāt": mamanthe.
- 2243 dvirvacane 'ci 1.1.59 — before an ac that causes doubling, no substitute replaces an ac while doubling is still to be done. acaḥ comes from SK 50, ādeśaḥ from 49, na from 51, and dvirvacane is read twice.
- This is a ban on the substitute, not an extension of form (TB).
kṛ + e → kṛ kṛ e, and yaṇ follows only after doubling (cakre, BM). - 2244 urat 7.4.66 — the ṛ of the abhyāsa → a, followed by r (uraṇ raparaḥ, SK 70):
kar kṛ e. halādiḥ śeṣaḥ (SK 2179) then drops the r: ka kṛ e. Why "when an affix follows"? vavraśca (BM). - 2245 kuhoś cuḥ 7.4.62 — a ka-varga sound or h of the abhyāsa → ca-varga. The match is made by external effort, so k → c (BM).
ka kṛ e → ca kṛ e, then yaṇ: cakre → edhāṃcakre, edhāṃcakrāte, edhāṃcakrire.- 2246 ekāca upadeśe 'nudāttāt 7.2.10 — no iṭ before a val-initial ārdhadhātuka after a root that is monosyllabic and anudātta in upadeśa. "upadeśe" goes with both words (madhyamaṇinyāya).
- kṛ is anudātta:
cakṛ + se → edhāṃcakṛṣe, with no iṭ and ṣ; also edhāṃcakrāthe. - "ekāc" keeps the ban out of yaṅ-luk, which gives the śtipā śapā verse. By "eka", vadh (substituted for han) still takes iṭ.
- 2247 iṇaḥ ṣīdhvaṃluṅliṭāṃ dho 'ṅgāt 8.3.78 — the dh of ṣīdhvam, luṅ and liṭ after an iṇ-final aṅga → ḍh (under apadāntasya mūrdhanyaḥ, SK 210).
cakṛ + dhve → edhāṃcakṛḍhve. Uttama: edhāṃcakre, edhāṃcakṛvahe, edhāṃcakṛmahe.- With bhū:
edhāmbabhūva, which is parasmaipada because 2240 names only kṛñ (TB). - When as is applied after, it does not become bhū by SK 2470. The kaumudī argues that otherwise Pāṇini would have said "kṛbhv" (BM, TB agree).
II.F. edhām āsa, then luṭ and lṛṭ — running example: edhām + as + a → edhām āsa; edh + iṭ + tās + ḍā → edhitā → edhitādhve, edhitāhe
- 2248 ata ādeḥ 7.4.70 — the initial a of the abhyāsa → long. abhyāsasya is carried forward from SK 2620, dīrghaḥ from SK 2456.
- It is an exception to pararūpa by ato guṇe:
a-as-a → āsa → edhām āsa, edhām āsatuḥ. - Then luṭ:
edhitā, edhitārau, edhitāraḥ; edhitāse, edhitāsāthe. - 2249 dhi ca 8.2.25 — s is elided before an affix beginning with dh:
edhitās + dhve → edhitādhve. - BM (Wikisource witness): saḥ is carried forward from SK 2342 and lopaḥ from SK 2191, and by tadādividhi "dhi" means an affix beginning with dh. This follows the p44 audit. The current en.yml gives rāt sasya / saṃyogāntasya lopaḥ as the translator's inference.
- TB (printed under sk.2266.t1): on the Bhāṣya's view s is elided; on Vāmana's, sic.
- 2250 ha eti 7.4.52 — the s of tās and of as → h before e. saḥ comes from SK 2342, tāsastyoḥ from SK 2191.
edhitās + e → edhitāhe. In edhitāsvahe and edhitāsmahe the s stays, since v or m follows it, not e.- lṛṭ:
edhiṣyate … edhiṣyāmahe, with sya, iṭ and ṣ.
II.G. loṭ of edh — running example: edhate → edhatām; edha-se → edhasva; edha-e → edhai
- 2251 ām etaḥ 3.4.90 — the e of loṭ → ām (loṭaḥ from SK 2198):
edhatām, edhetām, edhantām. - 2252 savābhyāṃ vāmau 3.4.91 — after s, loṭ's e → va; after v, e → am.
edha-se → edhasva; edha-dhve → edhadhvam. edhethām goes by 2251.- The substitute is the unit va (v + a; BM), not bare v. This follows the p44 audit; the en.yml sutra_en still says "v".
- 2253 eta ai 3.4.93 — the e of an uttama loṭ ending → ai, an exception to 2251:
edhai, edhāvahai, edhāmahai.
II.H. laṅ, the two liṅs, luṅ and lṛṅ of edh; the anudātta roots — running example: ā + edha + ta → aidhata; edha + (s)īy + ta → edheta; edh-i-sīy-s-ta → edhiṣīṣṭa; aidh-i-ṣ-at-a → aidhiṣata
- 2254 āḍ ajādīnām 6.4.72 — ac-initial roots take āṭ in luṅ, laṅ and lṛṅ, an exception to aṭ. aṭ would give pararūpa by ato guṇe (BM).
- Vṛddhi by āṭaś ca (SK 269):
ā + edhata → aidhata; aidhetām, aidhanta … aidhāmahi. - BM and TB report that the Bhāṣya/Vārttika set this sūtra aside (pratyākhyāta).
- 2255 liṅaḥ sīyuṭ 3.4.102 — the ātmanepada endings of liṅ take the augment sīyuṭ. It is ātmanepada only because the parasmaipada endings get yāsuṭ (SK 2209; BM). In vidhiliṅ its s is lost by SK 2211.
edha + īy + ta: ād guṇaḥ, then y is lost: edheta; also edheyātām.- 2256 jhasya ran 3.4.105 — the jha of liṅ → ran:
edheran; also edhethāḥ, edheyāthām, edhedhvam. - 2257 iṭo 't 3.4.106 — the iṭ of liṅ → a:
edheya, edhevahi, edhemahi. - āśīrliṅ is ārdhadhātuka (SK 2215), so the s-loss of SK 2211 does not apply: that rule needs a sārvadhātuka (BM; the p44 audit reading).
- The s of both sīyuṭ and suṭ belongs to an affix, so both become ṣ:
edhiṣīṣṭa, edhiṣīyāstām, edhiṣīran … edhiṣīdhvam. - edhiṣīdhvam has no ḍh, because the dh does not follow an iṇ-final aṅga (TB).
- luṅ begins:
aidhiṣṭa, aidhiṣātām. - 2258 ātmanepadeṣv anataḥ 7.1.5 — in ātmanepada, the jh after a non-a → at. jhaḥ is carried forward from SK 2169, at from SK 2479.
aidh-i-ṣ + jha → aidhiṣata; also aidhiṣṭhāḥ, aidhiṣāthām.aidhiḍhvam: s is lost by 2249 and dh → ḍh by 2247, because the iṭ counts inside the sic-aṅga (BM). On the view that iṇ there excludes iṭ, the form is aidhidhvam. With optional doubling of ḍh/dh, v and m there are sixteen forms.- Also aidhiṣi, aidhiṣvahi, aidhiṣmahi, and the lṛṅ series aidhiṣyata … aidhiṣyāmahi.
- edh takes iṭ because it is udātta. Once the anudātta it-vowel is gone, the root is not anudātta (BM).
- Kārikās (11 verses): the anudātta (aniṭ) roots. Monosyllabic ajantas are anudātta except those ending in ū or ṝ and the named exceptions. There are 102 halanta roots, from śaklṛ to vah. Several are cited with śyan, śap, luk or their anubandhas to exclude homonyms. vindati is added on the Bhāṣya's authority, and nine are added on Vyāghrabhūti's.
- Then root (3) spardha saṃgharṣe. It is akarmaka because its object is contained in the root's meaning:
spardhate.
II.I. liṭ of the d/dh-final ātmanepadins: the kept khay, e with loss of the abhyāsa, num — running example: spardh + e → paspardhe; dadh dadh e → dedhe; skud → skundate, cuskunde; dad → dadade
- 2259 śarpūrvāḥ khayaḥ 7.4.61 — in the abhyāsa, a khay preceded by śar is the consonant that remains. It is an exception to halādiḥ śeṣaḥ.
- The compound is an atadguṇasaṃvijñāna bahuvrīhi, so the śar itself goes. "ādiḥ" is also carried forward: the khay must be initial once the śar is set aside, which is why vavraśca keeps no c (BM, TB).
spardh spardh e → pa-spardh-e → paspardhe. The rest is like edh, with aṭ for āṭ: spardhitā, spardhiṣyate, spardhatām, aspardhata, spardheta, spardhiṣīṣṭa, aspardhiṣṭa, aspardhiṣyata.- Then gādhṛ (jagādhe), bādhṛ, nāthṛ, nādhṛ.
- Vārttika āśiṣi nāthaḥ: nāth takes ātmanepada only in the sense of blessing, a niyama (BM, TB):
nāthate, elsewhere nāthati. - Then nādhate, and dadha (
dadhate). - 2260 ata ekahalmadhye 'nādeśāder liṭi 6.4.120 — before a kit liṭ, an a standing between two single consonants → e, and the abhyāsa is lost. et and abhyāsalopaḥ are carried forward from SK 2471.
- The aṅga must not begin with a substitute that liṭ conditions; liṭi is read twice (BM, TB). The example comes in 2261.
- 2261 thali ca seṭi 6.4.121 — the same happens before thal with iṭ.
- "ādeśa" in 2260 means only a substitute that changes the form. The jñāpaka is that 2263 names śas and dad. So an abhyāsa jaś or car that leaves the sound unchanged does not block the rule:
dadh dadh e → dedhe, dedhāte, dedhire. - Counterexamples: didivatuḥ (not a), rarāse (tapara), tatsaratuḥ (not between single consonants), cakaṇatuḥ (k → c changes the form).
- The substitute must be conditioned by liṭ. So nemitha (n by ṇo naḥ) and sehe (s by 2264) do get e.
- Then root (9) skudi.
- 2262 idito num dhātoḥ 7.1.58 — a root whose it is short i takes num after its last vowel.
skud + num → skundate; cuskunde, where the k is kept by 2259 and becomes c by 2245 (BM).- Likewise śvindate/śiśvinde, vandate/vavande, bhandate, mandate, spandate/paspande, klindate caitram/ciklinde. Then muda (modate) and dada (dadate).
- 2263 na śasadadavādiguṇānām 6.4.126 — no e and no loss of the abhyāsa (2260) for the a of śas, dad, v-initial roots, or the a inside an ar/av that the word guṇa produces (paparatuḥ, BM).
dad dad e → dadade, not *dede; dadadāte, dadadire. Then ṣvada and svarda.
II.J. Root-initial ṣ → s; lengthening before a penultimate r — running example: ṣvad → svadate, sasvade; urd → ūrdate, ūrdāṃcakre
- 2264 dhātvādeḥ ṣaḥ saḥ 6.1.64 — a root's initial ṣ in upadeśa → s. upadeśe is carried forward from SK 2370.
ṣvad → svadate; anusvadate, where the new s takes no ṣ by sāt padādyoḥ (SK 2123).sasvade: the a stands next to a conjunct, so there is no e (BM). Likewise svardate, sasvarde.- The root is taught with ṣ so that the ṣ is heard in asiṣvadat (BM). Why "ādi"? laṣati (BM, TB).
- 2265 upadhāyāṃ ca 8.2.78 — an ik before a root's penultimate r or v that is followed by a hal → long (rvor ikaḥ from SK 433, dhātoḥ from 2485, hali from 354).
urd → ūrdate; ūrdāṃcakre, with ām by 2237. Also kūrdate/cukūrde, gūrdate, godate/jugude, sūdate/suṣūde.- Verse: monosyllabic roots that begin with s followed by a purely dental sound or an ac are ṣopadeśa. Excepted are sek, sṛp, sṛ, stṛ, sṛj, stṝ, styā; ṣvaṣk, svid, svad, svañj, svap and smiṅ are added.
- Then hrād (jahrāde), hlādī, svād, pard, yatī (
yete, e with loss of the abhyāsa), yutṛ (yuyute), jutṛ, vithṛ, vethṛ, śranthate, granthate and katthate. That ends the anudātteta roots. - The 38 t-class-final parasmaipadins begin with (38) ata: atati. liṭ āta, ātatuḥ, ātuḥ, by 2248. luṅ reaches the stage
āt-i-s-ī-t.
II.K. luṅ of seṭ parasmaipadins: sic-loss before īṭ, and vṛddhi blocked — running example: āt-i-s-ī-t → ātīt; mā bhavān atīt; cyut → acyutat / acyotīt
- 2266 iṭa īṭi 8.2.28 — an s after iṭ is elided before īṭ (sasya from SK 280, lopaḥ from SK 54).
- Vārttika: the loss of sic counts as siddha for a single substitute (ekādeśa). So i + ī merge:
āti-s-ī-t → āti-ī-t → ātīt. - In ātiṣṭām and ātiṣuḥ no īṭ comes, so the s stays.
- 2267 vadavrajahalantasyācaḥ 7.2.3 — vṛddhi of the ac of vad, vraj and a hal-final aṅga before sic with a parasmaipada ending (carried forward from SK 2297). It would give vṛddhi to the a of at.
- vad and vraj are named so that their vṛddhi is obligatory against the option of 2284: avādīt, avrājīt (BM, TB).
- 2268 neṭi 7.2.4 — that vṛddhi, in effect only the halanta vṛddhi, does not come before a sic that begins with iṭ (BM, TB).
- The effect shows only without āṭ:
mā bhavān atīt, atiṣṭām, atiṣuḥ (BM). - citī: cetati, ciceta,
acetīt, acetiṣṭām, acetiṣuḥ. - cyutir. Vārttika: ir as a whole is the it, so the root is not idit and takes no num: cyotati, cucyota.
- 2269 irito vā 3.1.57 — after an irit root, aṅ optionally replaces cli before parasmaipada. cleḥ comes from 2222, aṅ from SK 2438.
acyutat: aṅ is ṅit, so there is no guṇa. The other option is acyotīt. Likewise ścyutir: aścyutat/aścyotīt, and ścotati.- mantha:
mathyāt. The kit yāsuṭ makes the n drop (SK 2216, 415). - kuthi, puthi, luthi and mathi are idit, so they keep the n: kunthyāt, manthyāt.
- (47) ṣidha: sedhati, siṣedha, sedhitā, asedhīt. After an upasarga, sāt padādyoḥ would block the ṣ, which is why 2270 follows.
II.L. ṣ for s after an upasarga — running example: ni + sedhati → niṣedhati; ni-a-sedhat → nyaṣedhat; ni + sisedha → niṣiṣedha; but gaṅgāṃ visedhati
- 2270 upasargāt sunotisuvatisyatistautistobhatisthāsenayasedhasicasañjasvañjām 8.3.65 — after an iṇ standing in an upasarga, s → ṣ in sunoti, suvati, syati, stauti, stobhati, sthā, senaya, sedha, sic, sañj and svañj. saḥ is carried forward from SK 335, and ṣ comes under SK 210.
- "sedha", with śap, means the bhvādi root, not divādi sidhyati. senaya is a ṇic-final nominal root (BM, TB). BM's example: abhiṣuṇoti.
- 2271 sadir aprateḥ 8.3.66 — the s of sad → ṣ after any upasarga except prati. The kaumudī gives no example; TB gives pratisīdati as the counterexample.
- 2272 stanbheḥ 8.3.67 — the s of the sautra stanbh → ṣ after an upasarga.
- The rule is split off from 2271 so that only stanbh runs on into 2273, and "aprateḥ" does not continue into it:
bāhupratiṣṭambhavivṛddhamanyuḥ. - The directly taught stanbh is meant, not ṣṭabhi, so vistambhate takes no ṣ (BM, TB).
- Our digital header reads stambheḥ; the print and the Aṣṭādhyāyī have stanbheḥ (a mūla item for Ajai).
- 2273 avāc cālambanāvidūryayoḥ 8.3.68 — after ava, the s of stanbh → ṣ in the senses support and nearness. BM's examples: yaṣṭim avaṣṭabhya tiṣṭhati; avaṣṭabdhā gauḥ.
- 2274 veś ca svano bhojane 8.3.69 — after vi, and by "ca" after ava, the s of svan → ṣ in the sense eating: viṣvaṇati, avaṣvaṇati (BM).
- 2275 parinivibhyaḥ sevasitasayasivusahasuṭstusvañjām 8.3.70 — after pari, ni, vi, s → ṣ in sev, sita, saya, sivu, saha, the augment suṭ, stu and svañj.
- The kaumudī's example is
niṣedhati: ṣidha after ni, with its ṣ by 2270. - The sūtra is quoted here because 2276 counts back to its word "sita". BM's examples: pariṣevate, viṣitaḥ, viṣayaḥ, pariṣīvyati, pariṣahate, pariṣkaroti.
- 2276 prāk sitād aḍvyavāye 'pi 8.3.63 — for the fifteen roots named before "sita", ṣ comes even when aṭ intervenes.
ni + a + sedhat → nyaṣedhat; also nyaṣedhīt, nyaṣedhiṣyat.- BM is printed under sk.2271.b1. The rule is needed because aṭ separates the iṇ from the s. "fifteen" follows BM and TB and the p44 audit.
- 2277 sthādiṣv abhyāsena cābhyāsasya 8.3.64 — for the ten roots from sthā to just before sita, ṣ comes even across the abhyāsa. Only these ten let the abhyāsa's own s become ṣ.
- That second part is a niyama: the abhyāsa's ṣ itself comes from 2270 (BM, TB).
ni + sisedha → niṣiṣedha, niṣiṣidhatuḥ. BM's contrast: abhisusūṣati, with no ṣ.- 2278 sedhater gatau 8.3.113 — no ṣ for sedh meaning going:
gaṅgāṃ visedhati. - BM, printed under sk.2358.b1: na is carried forward from SK 3168. By anantarasya it cancels only the ṣ of 2270, so siṣedha still gets ṣ by ādeśapratyayayoḥ (SK 212). This follows the p44 audit.
- Then root (48) ṣidhū śāstre māṅgalye ca.
II.M. ṣidhū with and without iṭ: dh for t/th, and s lost between jhals — running example: sisedh + tha → siṣedh-dha → siṣeddha / siṣedhitha; asaidh-s-tām → asaiddhām
- 2279 svaratisūtisūyatidhūñūdito vā 7.2.44 — iṭ is optional before a val-initial ārdhadhātuka after svṛ, sū (adādi sūti and divādi sūyati), dhūñ and ūdit roots. ārdhadhātukasyeḍ valādeḥ is carried forward from SK 2184.
- ṣidhū is ūdit, so its forms come with and without iṭ in 2280.
- 2280 jhaṣas tathor dho 'dhaḥ 8.2.40 — a t or th after a jhaṣ → dh, except after dhā (TB's counterexample: dhattaḥ).
siṣedh + tha → siṣedh + dha; the first dh becomes d by jaśtva: siṣeddha. With iṭ: siṣedhitha.- Likewise
seddhā / sedhitā and setsyati / sedhiṣyati. asaitsīt: īṭ by 2225, vṛddhi by 2267, and cartva (BM).- 2281 jhalo jhali 8.2.26 — an s after a jhal is lost before a jhal, all three in one pada (TB). sasya and lopaḥ are carried forward as in 2266.
asaidh-s-tām → asaidh-tām → asaiddhām, with dh and jaśtva.- asaitsuḥ, asaitsīḥ, asaitsam, asaitsva and asaitsma keep the s; asaiddham and asaiddha lose it.
- With iṭ:
asedhīt, where neṭi blocks vṛddhi; asedhiṣṭām. - Then khādṛ (khādati, cakhāda) and khada.
II.N. vṛddhi of the penultimate a: in liṭ, and optionally in the seṭ luṅ — running example: ca-khad + ṇal(a) → cakhāda; uttama cakhāda / cakhada; akhādīt / akhadīt
- 2282 ata upadhāyāḥ 7.2.116 — a penultimate short a → vṛddhi before a ñit or ṇit affix. vṛddhiḥ is carried forward from SK 2473.
cakhad + a (ṇal) → cakhāda. There is no e or loss of the abhyāsa, because ṇal is pit and so not kit (BM).- 2283 ṇal uttamo vā 7.1.91 — the uttama ṇal is only optionally ṇit (ṇit from SK 284):
cakhāda / cakhada. - 2284 ato halāder laghoḥ 7.2.7 — the light a of a hal-initial aṅga optionally takes vṛddhi before an iṭ-initial sic with a parasmaipada ending. sici vṛddhiḥ is carried forward from SK 2297, iṭi from 2268 and vibhāṣā from SK 2449.
akhādīt / akhadīt, with sic lost by 2266.- bada, which begins with the labial b: babāda.
bedatuḥ, beditha: the jaśtva of the abhyāsa does not change the form, so e and loss of the abhyāsa follow. With a v-initial root, 2263 would block them (BM, TB).- Uttama babāda/babada; luṅ abādīt/abadīt.
- Then gada: gadati.
II.O. ṇ for the n of ni before gad and the rest; root-initial ṇ → n — running example: pra + ni + gadati → praṇigadati; ṇad → nad-
- 2285 ner gadanadapatapadaghumāsyatihantiyātivātidrātipsātivapativahatiśāmyaticinotidegdhiṣu ca 8.4.17 — the n of ni → ṇ after an upasarga r or ṣ, obligatorily, before gada, nada, pata, pada, the ghu roots, mā, syati, hanti, yāti, vāti, drāti, psāti, vapati, vahati, śāmyati, cinoti and degdhi. Compare the optional 2232.
- raṣābhyāṃ no ṇaḥ is carried forward from SK 235, and upasargāt from SK 2287, which here means "standing in an upasarga".
- The roots are named with śap and śtip to exclude yaṅ-luk (BM, TB).
pra + ni + gadati → praṇigadati; jagāda. Then rada (rarāda, redatuḥ), and (54) ṇada.- 2286 ṇo naḥ 6.1.65 — a root-initial ṇ → n. dhātvādeḥ is carried forward from 2264, so aṇati is untouched (BM, TB). ṇad is taught with ṇ and is used as nad-.
- The ṇopadeśa roots are all n-initial roots except nard, nāṭi, nāth, nādh, nand, nakk, nṝ and nṛt (bhāṣyaphalita).
- Only the curādi nāṭi is excluded, so the ghaṭādi naṭ is ṇopadeśa.
- Some would exclude only five, taking nādh, nṝ and nand as ṇopadeśa too (BM notes that this conflicts with the Bhāṣya).
Part III — SK 2287–2354: roots 55–845 — liṭ iṭ, aorist stems, āya/ṇiṅ, caṅ, the dyutādi, vṛtādi, ghaṭādi
Covers SK 2287–2354 (68 sūtras): all present.
- AS-refs: all 68 are checked against references/ashtadhyayi/sutraani-data.json, by SK number and sūtra text.
- Order: SK order, with one move. 2291 (optional aṅ) is taken out of the liṭ block and placed at the head of group C, with the other luṅ rules.
- Audit corrections followed: from .work/sk-run/p44-audit-fixes.md. They are 2293 (tataḥ), 2300 (jhalādī is dual), 2313 (how the vārttika's precedence is distributed) and 2352 (taṅānayor abhāve). The fixers may not have written them into every en.yml yet.
Contents (this part)
- 2287–2290: the nad…ukh run. ṇ for ṇopadeśa roots, nuṭ after the lengthened ā, initial ñi/ṭu/ḍu as it, and uvaṅ in the abhyāsa.
- 2292–2296: aj → vī, and the iṭ of liṭ and thal.
- 2291, 2297–2300: luṅ and āśīrliṅ stems. Optional aṅ, sic-vṛddhi and what blocks it, the long vowel before y, and kit liṅ/sic in the ātmanepada.
- 2301–2302: e with loss of the abhyāsa for trap, and num for jabh.
- 2303–2311: āya and ṇiṅ as root-forming affixes, and the periphrastic liṭ with ām.
- 2312–2318: the caṅ-aorist of ṇi-final stems (acīkamata).
- 2319–2323: am…kram. ā for san before y, the long vowel before a śit affix, optional śyan, and the iṭ of kram.
- 2324–2329: ay…tāy. ām for ay, optional ḍh, l for the r of an upasarga, pī for pyāy, and ciṇ with luk of ta.
- 2330–2334: al, ji, dhinv. Vṛddhi of l/r-final a-roots, a velar after the abhyāsa, and the u-vikaraṇa of dhinv/kṛṇv.
- 2335–2343: ūṣman-final roots. ḍh-lopa, ksa, śnu for akṣ/takṣ, optional iṭ before t, ām for uṣ, t for the s of ghas, and aṅ for ḷdit roots.
- 2344–2352: the dyutādi and vṛtādi groups, closing with kḷp.
- 2353–2354: the ghaṭādi (mit) and phaṇādi groups.
III.A. The nad…ukh run: ṇ for ṇopadeśa roots, nuṭ after the lengthened ā, the initial it-letters, and uvaṅ in the abhyāsa — running example: ard + ṇal → ā ard a → ānarda; ukh → uvokha, ūkhatuḥ
- 2287 upasargād asamāse 'pi ṇopadeśasya 8.4.14 — the n of a root taught with ṇ (ṇopadeśa) becomes ṇ after an r or ṣ that stands in an upasarga, in a compound or outside one. The heading is raṣābhyāṃ no ṇaḥ (SK 235).
- "asamāse" is said because "samāse" would otherwise carry over from SK 1019. "api" is added so that compounds like praṇāmaḥ are kept (BM, TB).
pra nadati → praṇadati: the r of pra is the cause and the n of nad is the target. pra and the verb are separate padas, so only this rule gives ṇ.praṇinadati: the ṇ of ni comes by ner gada… (SK 2285). The n of nad stays, because something other than aṭ, ku, pu, āṅ or num separates it from the r.- The print reads praṇinadati; ours reads praṇinaditi (mūla, for Ajai).
- Root 55 ard: in liṭ, after doubling, ata ādeḥ (SK 2248) lengthens the abhyāsa's a, giving
ā ard a. - 2288 tasmān nuḍ dvihalaḥ 7.4.71 — after that lengthened ā, a root with two consonants gives nuṭ to what follows, as its initial.
ā + ard + a → ā n ard a → ānarda. The luṅ ārdīt has no abhyāsa and so no nuṭ.- Roots 56–67 (nard…ṭunadi): nard is not ṇopadeśa, so
pranardati has no ṇ. nuṭ appears again in ānanta and ānanda. ṇidi is ṇopadeśa: praṇindati. - 2289 ādir ñiṭuḍavaḥ 1.3.5 — ñi, ṭu and ḍu at the start of a root in upadeśa are it. upadeśe and it are carried from SK 3, dhātu from SK 18.
ṭunadi → nad, with i as it (idit): num gives nandati. Being idit, it also escapes n-deletion by aniditām… (SK 415): nandyāt. Contrast śundha, which is not idit: śudhyāt.- Vārttika (k2): for a root with ṛ as penultimate, the kit-hood of liṭ prevails over guṇa (pūrvavipratiṣedha):
vṛk → vavṛke. - Vārttika (k4): no s-substitution (SK 2264) for nominal roots, ṣṭhiv or ṣvaṣk:
ṣvaṣkate, ṣaṣvaṣke. - Roots 68–155: the idit d-final roots, the 42 k-final anudātteta roots (śīkṛ…ślāghṛ), and the fifty parasmaipadins (phakka…ligi).
- 2290 abhyāsasyāsavarṇe 6.4.78 — the i or u of an abhyāsa becomes iyaṅ or uvaṅ before a dissimilar ac. aci, yvoḥ and iyaṅuvaṅau are carried from SK 271 (BM).
ukh + ṇal: doubling comes first (dvirvacane 'ci), then halādiḥ śeṣaḥ, then laghūpadha-guṇa of the root's u, giving u okh a. The abhyāsa u now faces the dissimilar o, so it becomes uv: uvokha.- No ām comes by ijādeś ca… (SK 2237), by the sannipāta-paribhāṣā. The guṇa is caused by ṇal, so it cannot bring in ām, because ām would cut the root off from ṇal (BM, TB).
ukh + atus: atus is kit, so there is no guṇa, and u ukh atus has a similar vowel, so no uvaṅ. Savarṇa-dīrgha gives ūkhatuḥ, ūkhuḥ.- That ū is not shortened again as part of the abhyāsa. The shortening (SK 2180) has already applied once, parjanyavat, before the lengthening (vārṇād āṅgaṃ balīyaḥ; paratva).
- Roots 156–196:
- ṛja: for nuṭ, the r-part of ṛ counts as a hal, giving
ānṛje. - kuñc:
kucyāt. - kruñc: the kaumudī gives
krucyāt. BM (Wikisource) reads kruñcyāt: the ñ is natural, so no n is deleted, and BM calls the ñ-less reading a slip. This is open for Ajai. - añcu:
acyāt in the sense of going; añcyāt in the sense of honouring (SK 424).
III.B. aj → vī, and the iṭ of liṭ and thal — running example: aj → vivāya, vivyatuḥ; thal: vivayitha / vivetha / ājitha
- 2292 ajer vy aghañapoḥ 2.4.56 — vī replaces aj in the domain of an ārdhadhātuka, except with ghañ and ap. "Domain" reads ārdhadhātuke as a viṣayasaptamī (BM, TB), which is what lets yaṅ give vevīyate.
- Vārttika: before a val-initial ārdhadhātuka, vī is optional. BM takes 'vā' from vā liṭi (SK 2437) as a vyavasthitavibhāṣā, and the vārttika as a pointer to it.
aj + ṇal → vī → vī vī a → vi vī a → vivāya. The steps after doubling are shortening of the abhyāsa, vṛddhi, and āy.vivyatuḥ, vivyuḥ: atus is kit, so there is no guṇa, and the ī becomes y by er anekācaḥ… (SK 272).- The v is not lengthened by upadhāyāṃ ca (SK 2265). The y counts as its ī (acaḥ parasmin, SK 50), and na padānta (SK 51) does not stop this: for dīrgha, only a deletion that substitutes for an ac (lopājādeśa) loses sthānivadbhāva (vārttika, k4).
- k5 raises the question of thal. vī counts as anudātta, so ekāca upadeśe 'nudāttāt (SK 2246) would bar iṭ. 2293–2296 settle this.
- 2293 kṛsṛbhṛvṛstudrusruśruvo liṭi 7.2.13 — after these eight roots, liṭ takes no iṭ ('na' and 'iṭ' from SK 2981).
- kṛ, sṛ, bhṛ and vṛ make a restriction (niyama). Any bar on iṭ in liṭ holds only for them, whether it rests on the base (SK 2246) or on the affix (SK 2381). So every other root is seṭ in liṭ: this is the krādiniyama.
- The other four are stu, dru, sru and śru. They are named ("tataḥ" = "other than those", BM; audit fix of "Hence") to bar iṭ in two places:
- in thal, where 2296 would bring it (tuṣṭotha);
- before v and m, where the niyama would bring it (tuṣṭuva).
- 2294 acas tāsvat thaly aniṭo nityam 7.2.61 — after an ac-final root that never takes iṭ in tās, thal takes no iṭ either. vī is ac-final and aniṭ in tās (
vetā), so thal gives vivetha. - 2295 upadeśe 'tvataḥ 7.2.62 — the same holds for a root with short a in upadeśa that never takes iṭ in tās. BM gives pac: papaktha.
- 2296 ṛto bhāradvājasya 7.2.63 — for Bhāradvāja, only ṛ-final roots of that kind refuse iṭ in thal; other roots take it. Set beside 2294–2295, this gives an option.
- The kaumudī sums it up in a verse (saṃgraha):
- An ac-final or a-bearing root that is aniṭ in tās is veṭ in thal.
- A ṛ-final root of that kind is always aniṭ in thal.
- Any root other than the eight of 2293 is seṭ in liṭ.
- stu and the rest get no option. By the maxim anantarasya, Bhāradvāja's view cancels only the bans of 2294–2295.
vī + thal → vivayitha (with iṭ, guṇa and ay) or vivetha (without iṭ). ājitha: by the vārttika there is no vī before val, and aj is seṭ.- With iṭ by the krādiniyama:
vivyathuḥ, vivya; vivāya / vivaya; vivyiva, vivyima. - Also
vetā / ajitā, veṣyati / ajiṣyati, vīyāt. - The print reads "na ca studrvādīnām api".
III.C. The luṅ and āśīrliṅ stems: optional aṅ, sic-vṛddhi and what blocks it, the long vowel before y, and kit liṅ/sic in the ātmanepada — running example: aj → avaiṣīt / ājīt; kṣi → kṣīyāt, akṣaiṣīt; kaṭe → akaṭīt; tip → tipsīṣṭa, atipta
- 2291 jṝstambhumrucumlucugrucuglucugluñcuśvibhyaś ca 3.1.58 — after jṝ, stambhu, mrucu, mlucu, grucu, glucu, gluñcu and śvi, aṅ optionally replaces cli. cleḥ comes from SK 2222, aṅ from SK 2438, vā from SK 2269. (Moved here from before 2292.)
mruc → amrucat / amrocīt; amlucat / amlocīt; aglucat / aglocīt; gluñc → aglucat / agluñcīt.- Roots 197–230:
- ṣasj:
sajjati, by ścutva and then jaśtva. - āñch:
āñcha. The t in ata ādeḥ takes in only a naturally short a, so there is no lengthening and hence no nuṭ. On the view that the t is only for ease of utterance, the form is ānāñcha. - 2297 sici vṛddhiḥ parasmaipadeṣu 7.2.1 — the final ik of the aṅga takes vṛddhi before sic followed by a parasmaipada ending.
a + vī + s + īt → avaiṣīt; without vī, ājīt. lṛṅ: aveṣyat, ājiṣyat.- Roots 231–236 (teja…kṣi):
cikṣāya, cikṣiyatuḥ; cikṣayitha / cikṣetha; kṣetā. - 2298 akṛtsārvadhātukayor dīrghaḥ 7.4.25 — the final ac of an aṅga is lengthened before a y-initial affix that is neither kṛt nor sārvadhātuka.
kṣi + yāt → kṣīyāt (āśīrliṅ). By 2297: akṣaiṣīt.- Roots 237–294:
- vraj:
avrājīt has obligatory vṛddhi by vadavraja… (SK 2267). - The 36 ṭa-class ātmanepadins follow.
- kaṭe leads into 2299.
- 2299 hmyantakṣaṇaśvasajāgṛṇiśvyeditām 7.2.5 — sic-vṛddhi does not apply before an iṭ-initial sic for these roots:
- roots ending in h, m or y;
- kṣaṇ, śvas and jāgṛ;
- ṇi-final aṅgas;
- śvi;
- roots with e as it.
kaṭe has e as it, so akaṭīt. This blocks the optional vṛddhi of ato halāder laghoḥ (SK 2284).- The rule is used again later:
adramīt (2319), ahayīt (2329), ahasīt (2343), akakhīt (2353). - Roots 295–365:
- aṭa:
āṭa. - iṭa kiṭa kaṭī, with i and ī read in by praśleṣa:
iyāya, iyetha. - sphuṭir:
asphuṭat / asphoṭīt. - paṭha:
apaṭhīt / apāṭhīt. - tipṛ:
teptā, iṭ by the krādiniyama titipiṣe. - 2300 liṅsicāv ātmanepadeṣu 1.2.11 — after a hal next to an ik, a liṅ and a sic followed by ātmanepada endings are kit, so there is no guṇa. Both begin with jhal: jhalādī is dual (audit fix; the current k1 applies jhalādi to the liṅ only).
tip + sīṣṭa → tipsīṣṭa, with no guṇa of the i.- luṅ:
atipta, where the s is lost by jhalo jhali (SK 2281); atipsātām, atipsata. - Roots 366–374:
vepate; trapūṣ → trapate.
III.D. e with loss of the abhyāsa for trap, and num for jabh — running example: trap → trepe; jabh → jambhate
- 2301 tṝphalabhajatrapaś ca 6.4.122 — for tṝ, phal, bhaj and trap, e replaces the a and the abhyāsa is dropped, before a kit liṭ and before thal with iṭ. The anuvṛttis are ataḥ and liṭi (SK 2260), et and abhyāsalopaḥ (SK 2471), kiti (SK 2363), and thali ca seṭi (SK 2261).
trap + e (kit liṭ) → trep + e → trepe, trepāte, trepire, with no reduplication.- trap is ūdit, so iṭ is optional:
trapitā / traptā; trapiṣīṣṭa / trapsīṣṭa. - Roots 375–389:
- kapi:
kampate. - stambh:
uttambhate (pūrvasavarṇa, SK 118). vistambhate has no ṣ: SK 2272 takes only the sautra root.- 2302 radhijabhor aci 7.1.61 — radh and jabh take num before an ac.
jabh + a + te → jambhate; jajambhe, jambhitā, jambhiṣṭa.- jṛmbhate gets its num from jṛbhi's own i-it, not from this rule.
- Roots 390–395:
stobhate, viṣṭobhate. The parasmaipadins open with gupū.
III.E. āya and ṇiṅ as root-forming affixes, and the periphrastic liṭ — running example: gup → gopāya → gopāyati, gopāyāṃcakāra / jugopa; kam → kāmi → kāmayate, kāmayāṃcakre / cakame
- 2303 gupūdhūpavicchipaṇipanibhya āyaḥ 3.1.28 — āya comes after gup, dhūp, vicch, paṇ and pan, in their own sense.
gup + āya → gopāya, with guṇa by puganta… (SK 2189). - 2304 sanādyantā dhātavaḥ 3.1.32 — a form ending in one of the affixes from san to the ṇiṅ of SK 2310 is a dhātu. So gopāya takes laṭ and the other lakāras:
gopāyati. - 2305 āyādaya ārdhadhātuke vā 3.1.31 — āya, īyaṅ and ṇiṅ are optional when an ārdhadhātuka is intended. This is the source of every with/without-āya pair below.
- 2306 kāspratyayād ām amantre liṭi 3.1.35 — ām comes in liṭ after kās and after a root ending in an affix, except in a mantra:
gopāya + ām. - Vārttika: with kās, state "anekāc" in place of "pratyaya". The print reads "tatsthāne 'nekāca iti"; ours reads "akāca".
- 2307 ārdhadhātuke 6.4.46 — adhikāra "before an ārdhadhātuka". This is the second heading of that wording; the other is 2.4.35 (SK 2432). No commentator states its extent. It frames 2308 and 2313.
- 2308 ato lopaḥ 6.4.48 — the a of an a-final stem is deleted before an ārdhadhātuka. The stem is a-final at the time the ārdhadhātuka is introduced. 'ārdhadhātuke' is taken twice.
gopāya + ām → gopāy ām → gopāyāṃcakāra / gopāyāṃbabhūva / gopāyām āsa.- Without āya:
jugopa, jugupatuḥ. The root is ūdit: jugopitha / jugoptha. gopāyitā / gopitā / goptā; agopāyīt / agopīt / agaupsīt.- Roots 396–442:
- dhūpa:
dhūpāyati. - tumpa:
tutumpatuḥ keeps its n, since a liṭ after a conjunct is not kit. But tupyāt loses it (kidāśiṣi, SK 2216). - Gaṇasūtra prāt tumpatau gavi kartari:
prastumpati gauḥ. - paṇ takes āya only in the sense of praising (
paṇāyati); elsewhere paṇate, peṇe. - kṣamūṣ:
cakṣame, cakṣamiṣe / cakṣaṃse. - 2309 mvoś ca 8.2.65 — the m of an m-final root becomes n before m or v (from mo no dhātoḥ, SK 341). ṇ then comes by SK 197.
cakṣam + vahe → cakṣan vahe → cakṣaṇvahe; cakṣaṇmahe. With iṭ: cakṣamimahe.kṣaṃsyate, akṣaṃsta.- Root 443 kamu is introduced here.
- 2310 kamer ṇiṅ 3.1.30 — ṇiṅ comes after kam in its own sense.
kam + i → kāmi, with vṛddhi. ṇiṅ is ṅit, so taṅ follows: kāmayate. - 2311 ayāmantālvāyyetnviṣṇuṣu 6.4.55 — ay replaces ṇi before ām, anta, ālu, āyya, itnu and iṣṇu. It is an exception to the ṇi-deletion of 2313.
kāmi + ām → kāmay ām → kāmayāṃcakre.- Without ṇiṅ (2305):
cakame. Likewise kāmayitā / kamitā, kāmayiṣyate / kamiṣyate.
III.F. The caṅ-aorist of ṇi-final stems — running example: kām i + luṅ → kām i a ta → kām a ta → kam a ta → ka kam a ta → ki kam a ta → kī kam a ta → acīkamata
- 2312 ṇiśridrusrubhyaḥ kartari caṅ 3.1.48 — caṅ replaces cli after a ṇi-final root, and after śri, dru and sru, in an agentive luṅ:
kāmi + cli + ta → kām i a ta. - 2313 ṇer aniṭi 6.4.51 — ṇi is deleted before an ārdhadhātuka that does not begin with iṭ.
- In
kām i a ta, yaṇ (SK 272) would win as the later rule. The vārttika ṇyallopāv iyaṅyaṇguṇavṛddhidīrghebhyaḥ pūrvavipratiṣedhena lets the deletion win instead: kām a ta. - Distribution (BM, TB; audit fix): ṇi-lopa prevails over all five of iyaṅ, yaṇ, guṇa, vṛddhi and dīrgha. a-lopa prevails only over vṛddhi and dīrgha.
- The kaumudī's own conclusion: because the rule says "aniṭi", every such ārdhadhātuka is its domain, so it is simply an exception (apavāda) to iyaṅ and the rest.
- The five: iyaṅ
atatakṣat, yaṇ aṭiṭat, guṇa kāraṇā, vṛddhi kārakaḥ, dīrgha kāryate. For yaṇ the print reads aṭiṭat; BM reads āṭiṭat. - 2314 ṇau caṅy upadhāyā hrasvaḥ 7.4.1 — the penultimate of an aṅga before ṇi followed by caṅ is shortened:
kām a ta → kam a ta. - 2315 caṅi 6.1.11 — before caṅ, the first single-vowelled part (ekāc) of a root that is not already an abhyāsa is doubled; for a vowel-initial root, the second. The headings are SK 2175–2177.
kam a ta → ka kam a ta. - 2316 sanval laghuni caṅpare 'naglope 7.4.93 — the abhyāsa is treated as before san under three conditions:
- a light vowel follows the abhyāsa;
- after that vowel comes a ṇi that has caṅ after it (caṅpare is a bahuvrīhi meaning that ṇi);
- no ak has been deleted before that ṇi (acakathat is TB's counter-example).
- Two construals are given, with 'aṅgasya' repeated or not. BM (filed under sk.2452.b1) holds that only the first has the Bhāṣya's support.
- In
ka kam a ta, the a of kam is the light vowel. It stands before the deleted ṇi, which has caṅ after it. So ka is treated as before san. - 2317 sanyataḥ 7.4.79 — before san, the a of the abhyāsa becomes i. Under 2316 this gives
ka kam a ta → ki kam a ta. - 2318 dīrgho laghoḥ 7.4.94 — the light vowel of the abhyāsa is lengthened wherever sanvadbhāva applies.
ki → kī. Then the abhyāsa's k becomes c, and aṭ is added: acīkamata.- Vārttika: caṅ also replaces cli after kam without ṇiṅ. There is no ṇi, so there is neither sanvadbhāva nor lengthening:
acakamata (print; ours reads acakramata). - Five verses (Mādhava, Kaiyaṭa) set out when the two operations apply:
- On the kāryakāla view, only where the whole aṅga is doubled.
- Otherwise ūrṇu gets the lengthening, and arthāpayati gets both.
- cakās gets both or neither, depending on the construal: acīcakāsat or acacakāsat (TB).
- ṇi is also construed with aglope, so roots with an ak as it (kamu and the like) still qualify.
- Roots 444–464:
- vaṇ:
vavaṇatuḥ, with no e-substitution, since the root begins with v (SK 2263). - dhraṇ:
daṃdhranti. - ṣaṇ:
senatuḥ.
III.G. am…kram: ā for san before y, the long vowel before a śit affix, optional śyan, and the iṭ of kram — running example: kram → krāmyati / krāmati, krāmyatu / krāmatu, akramīt
- 2319 ye vibhāṣā 6.4.43 — jan, san and khan optionally take ā for their final before a y-initial kit or ṅit affix:
san + yāt → sāyāt / sanyāt. - Roots 465–472: am
āma; dram adramīt, with no vṛddhi (2299); mīmṛ mimīma. - 2320 ṣṭhivuklamucamāṃ śiti 7.3.75 — ṣṭhiv, klam and cam lengthen their vowel before a śit affix.
- Vārttika: for cam, only after āṅ.
ā + cam + a + ti → ācāmati; but camati, vicamati, and luṅ acamīt. - Root 473 kramu.
- 2321 vā bhrāśabhlāśabhramukramuklamutrasitruṭilaṣaḥ 3.1.70 — before an agentive sārvadhātuka, śyan comes optionally after bhrāś, bhlāś, bhram, kram, klam, tras, truṭ and laṣ. So there are two stems:
kram + ya or kram + a. - 2322 kramaḥ parasmaipadeṣu 7.3.76 — kram lengthens before a śit affix that has a parasmaipada ending after it.
krāmyati / krāmati; krāmyatu / krāmatu.- The long ā of cakrāma is upadhā-vṛddhi, not this rule (translator's note).
- 2323 snukramor anātmanepadanimitte 7.2.36 — snu and kram take iṭ before a val-initial ārdhadhātuka only when there is no cause of ātmanepada:
akramīt. - Roots 474–480: aya…ṇaya,
ayate.
III.H. ay…tāy: ām for ay, optional ḍh, l for the r of an upasarga, pī for pyāy, and ciṇ with luk of ta — running example: ay → ayāṃcakre, āyiḍhvam / āyidhvam, palāyate; pyāy → pipye, apyāyi
- 2324 dayāyāsaś ca 3.1.37 — ām comes in liṭ after day, ay and ās (continued from 2306):
ayāṃcakre; also ayeta, ayiṣīṣṭa. - 2325 vibhāṣeṭaḥ 8.3.79 — the dh of ṣīdhvam, and of luṅ and liṭ endings, optionally becomes ḍh. This applies after an iṭ that itself follows an iṇ.
ayiṣīḍhvam / ayiṣīdhvam; luṅ āyiḍhvam / āyidhvam, and āyiṣṭa.- 2326 upasargasyāyatau 8.2.19 — the r of an upasarga becomes l before ay:
pra + ayate → plāyate; parā + ayate → palāyate. - For nis and dus, the ru of the s is asiddha, so there is no l:
nirayate, durayate. With nir and dur the r becomes l: nilayate, dulayate. pratyaya is from iṇ, not from ay.- Māgha's parasmaipada
udayati is explained in two ways: from the i read in by praśleṣa, or because ātmanepada due to an anudātta it is not invariable. - Roots 481–488: daya
dayāṃcakre; ūyī ūyāṃcakre; vay vavaye; praṇayate; opyāyī. - 2327 liḍyaṅoś ca 6.1.29 — pyāy is replaced by pī in liṭ and in yaṅ (continued from pyāyaḥ pī, SK 3072).
pyāy + e → pī + e. Doubling then applies again by renewed application (punaḥprasaṅgavijñāna): pī pī e. Yaṇ follows (SK 272): pipye, pipyāte, pipyire.- For the plural the print reads pipyire; ours reads pipyare.
- 2328 dīpajanabudhapūritāyipyāyibhyo 'nyatarasyām 3.1.61 — after dīp, jan, budh, pūr, tāy and pyāy, ciṇ optionally replaces cli when the ending ta follows.
- 2329 ciṇo luk 6.4.104 — luk of what follows ciṇ.
a + pyāy + i + ta → apyāyi; with sic, apyāyiṣṭa. Likewise atāyi / atāyiṣṭa.- Roots 489–515:
- tevṛ, devṛ:
titeve, dideve. The print has these forms; ours drops them. - ṣevṛ:
pariṣevate (SK 2275). - haya:
ahayīt (2299). - Root 515 ala leads into 2330.
III.I. al, ji and dhinv: vṛddhi of l/r-final a-roots, a velar after the abhyāsa, and the u-vikaraṇa of dhinv/kṛṇv — running example: dhinv → dhin + a + u → dhinoti; dhinvaḥ / dhinuvaḥ; dhinu
- 2330 ato lrāntasya 7.2.2 — before sic with parasmaipada endings, the a of an aṅga takes vṛddhi when that aṅga ends in an l or r right next to the a.
- This is an exception both to neṭi (SK 2268) and to the option of SK 2284.
al → mā bhavān ālīt; aphālīt, askhālīt, agālīt, atsārīt.- Counter-example:
abhr → abhrīt, where the r does not stand next to an a. - Roots 516–561:
- phal:
phelatuḥ (2301). - ṣṭhivu:
ṣṭhīvati (2320). - Root 561 ji leads into 2331.
- 2331 sanliṭor jeḥ 7.3.57 — after an abhyāsa caused by san or liṭ, the j of ji becomes a velar.
ji + ṇal → ji ji a → jigāya; jigyatuḥ, jigyuḥ; jigayitha / jigetha.- Where there is no abhyāsa, j stays:
jetā, jīyāt, ajaiṣīt. - BM on this sūtra is filed in sk.2330.b1.
- Roots 562–594: urvī
ūrvāṃcakāra; turvī tutūrva (SK 2265); pivi pinvati; hivi, divi, dhivi, jivi hinvati. - 2332 dhinvikṛṇvyor a ca 3.1.80 — in the domain of śap, the final of dhinv and kṛṇv becomes a, and the affix u is added (drawn by "ca" from SK 2466).
dhinv → dhin + a + u. The a is lost by ato lopaḥ (2308). Because the lost a still counts (sthānivat), the i of dhin gets no laghūpadha-guṇa.- The u takes guṇa before a pit ending:
dhinoti, dhinutaḥ, dhinvanti. For the last form the print and ours both read dhinvati. - 2333 lopaś cāsyānyatarasyāṃ mvoḥ 6.4.107 — an affix-u not preceded by a conjunct is optionally lost before m or v.
dhinvaḥ / dhinuvaḥ; dhinmaḥ / dhinumaḥ.- Before mip, guṇa wins as the later rule:
dhinomi. - 2334 utaś ca pratyayād asaṃyogapūrvāt 6.4.106 — after such an affix-u, hi takes luk ('luk' from 2329, 'heḥ' from SK 2202):
dhinu. - āṭ is nitya, so it comes before the u can be lost:
dhinavāva, dhinavāma. - Roots 595–649:
- kṛvi:
kṛṇoti, conjugated like dhinoti. - ava:
mā bhavān avīt. - dhāvu is svaritet:
dhāvati / dhāvate. - The ūṣman-final ātmanepadins, from dhukṣa to gāhū.
III.J. ūṣman-final roots: ḍh-lopa, ksa, śnu for akṣ and takṣ, optional iṭ before t, ām for uṣ, t for the s of ghas, and aṅ for ḷdit roots — running example: gṛh → aghṛkṣata, aghṛkṣātām; akṣ → akṣṇoti / akṣati; ghas → ghatsyati, aghasat
- 2335 ḍho ḍhe lopaḥ 8.3.13 — ḍh is lost before ḍh.
gāh + tā → gāḍh tā → gāḍh dhā → gāḍh ḍhā → gāḍhā: h → ḍh, then t → dh, then ṣṭutva, then this rule.- Likewise
agāḍha, agāḍhāḥ, aghāḍhvam. - Root 650 gṛhū (print "garhaṇe"; BM "grahaṇe"): by the ṛdupadha vārttika,
jagṛhe. Also garḍhā. - 2336 śala igupadhād aniṭaḥ ksaḥ 3.1.45 — ksa replaces cli after a root that ends in a śal, has an ik as penultimate and is aniṭ.
gṛh without iṭ: gṛh + ksa + ta → aghṛkṣata. - 2337 ksasyāci 7.3.72 — ksa loses its final a before an ac-initial taṅ ending.
aghṛkṣa + ātām → aghṛkṣātām. With the a gone, āto ṅitaḥ (SK 2235) does not bring iy. Likewise aghṛkṣanta.- Roots 651–654: ghuṣir
aghuṣat / aghoṣīt; akṣū. - 2338 akṣo 'nyatarasyām 3.1.75 — akṣ optionally takes śnu; otherwise śap.
akṣṇoti / akṣati; akṣṇuvanti / akṣanti.ānakṣa; ānakṣitha / ānaṣṭha. BM reads ānaṣṭha; the print and ours read ānaṣṭa.akṣyati (SK 380, then SK 295).ākṣṇavam: BM's reading; the print and ours read ākṣṇuvam.- luṅ: with iṭ, neṭi blocks the vṛddhi:
mā bhavān akṣīt. Without iṭ: ākṣīt. - 2339 tanūkaraṇe takṣaḥ 3.1.76 — takṣ optionally takes śnu in the sense of making thin:
takṣṇoti / takṣati kāṣṭham. - Counter-example:
vāgbhiḥ saṃtakṣati, "he reviles". - Roots 657–694:
praṇikṣati; śiṣ aśikṣat, with ksa (2336). - 2340 tīṣasahalubharuṣariṣaḥ 7.2.48 — after iṣ, sah, lubh, ruṣ and riṣ, a t-initial ārdhadhātuka takes iṭ optionally.
roṣitā / roṣṭā; reṣitā / reṣṭā.roṣiṣyati is seṭ only: sya does not begin with t.- 2341 uṣavidajāgṛbhyo 'nyatarasyām 3.1.38 — after uṣ, vid and jāgṛ, ām in liṭ is optional:
oṣāṃcakāra / uvoṣa, ūṣatuḥ, uvoṣitha. - Roots 697–715:
- viṣu:
viveṣitha, iṭ by the krādiniyama. - puṣa is seṭ, so there is no ksa (
apoṣīt). - śliṣu is seṭ too. The print reads "seṭ"; ours reads "neṭ", which reverses the sense.
- ghasḷ is used only where there is an indication (liṅga) or a direct statement.
- 2342 saḥ sy ārdhadhātuke 7.4.49 — s becomes t before an s-initial ārdhadhātuka:
ghas + sya + ti → ghatsyati. - ghas has no āśīrliṅ, since nothing indicates it.
- 2343 puṣādidyutādyḷditaḥ parasmaipadeṣu 3.1.55 — aṅ replaces cli, with parasmaipada endings, after three groups: puṣ and the rest (divādi), dyut and the rest, and ḷdit roots.
ghasḷ → aghasat. - Roots 716–741:
- has:
ahasīt (edit, 2299). - śas:
śaśasatuḥ (SK 2263). - tuhir:
atuhat / atohīt. - dyuta opens the dyut group.
III.K. The dyutādi and vṛtādi groups, closing with kḷp — running example: dyut → didyute, adyutat / adyotiṣṭa; vṛt → vartsyati / vartiṣyate, avṛtat / avartiṣṭa; kṛp → kalpate, kalptāsi
- 2344 dyutisvāpyoḥ saṃprasāraṇam 7.4.67 — the abhyāsa of dyut and of svāpi takes saṃprasāraṇa. svāpi is svap with ṇic (TB).
dyut dyut e → dyu → diu → di (pūrvarūpa, SK 330) → didyute, didyutāte.- This is an exception to halādiḥ śeṣaḥ, which would drop the y (BM).
dyotitā.- 2345 dyudbhyo luṅi 1.3.91 — after dyut and the rest, parasmaipada is optional in luṅ.
- With parasmaipada, aṅ comes (2343):
adyutat. Otherwise adyotiṣṭa. śvit → aśvitat / aśvetiṣṭa.- 2346 mider guṇaḥ 7.3.82 — mid takes guṇa before a śit affix:
mid + a + te → medate. - The liṭ ending eś has no initial ś-it, so no guṇa:
mimide. Also amidat / amediṣṭa. - Roots 744–758: ruca
arucat / arociṣṭa; sraṃsu asrasat; vṛtu leads into 2347. - 2347 vṛdbhyaḥ syasanoḥ 1.3.92 — after vṛt and the rest, parasmaipada is optional before sya and san.
- 2348 na vṛdbhyaś caturbhyaḥ 7.2.59 — after the four roots vṛt, vṛdh, śṛdh and syand, an s-initial ārdhadhātuka takes no iṭ when taṅ and āna are absent.
- vṛt:
vartsyati / vartiṣyate; avartsyat / avartiṣyata. With the dyut-aṅ, avṛtat / avartiṣṭa. - syand:
- Because the rule names "four", it overrides the ū-it option:
syantsyati. - In the ātmanepada the option stands:
syandiṣyate / syantsyate. - luṅ:
asyadat, and asyanta. After asyantsātām, the print adds asyantsata, which ours lacks. - 2349 anuviparyabhinibhyaḥ syandater aprāṇiṣu 8.3.72 — after anu, vi, pari, abhi and ni, the s of syand optionally becomes ṣ when the agent is not a living being.
anuṣyandate / anusyandate jalam. Counter-example: anusyandate hastī.- "aprāṇiṣu" is a relative negation (paryudāsa), so the ṣ is allowed even when the agents are mixed:
matsyodake anuṣyandete. - Root 762 kṛpū.
- 2350 kṛpo ro laḥ 8.2.18 — the words are split as "kṛpa u", and 'kṛpa' is repeated. This gives two statements:
- the r of kṛp becomes l;
- the r-like part of its ṛ becomes the l-like part.
kṛp → karp (guṇa) → kalpate. In liṭ there is no guṇa (kit), so the ṛ itself changes: cakṛpe → cakḷpe. Also cakḷpiṣe / cakḷpse.- 2351 luṭi ca kḷpaḥ 1.3.93 — kḷp optionally takes parasmaipada in luṭ, and also before sya and san (drawn by "ca" from 2347).
- 2352 tāsi ca kḷpaḥ 7.2.60 — after kḷp, tās and an s-initial ārdhadhātuka take no iṭ when taṅ and āna are absent. Audit fix: the condition is not "when parasmaipada is used".
- luṭ:
kalptāsi, kalptāstha; in the ātmanepada, kalpitāse / kalptāse. - lṛṭ:
kalpsyati; kalpiṣyate / kalpsyate. - luṅ:
akḷpat; akalpiṣṭa / akḷpta. - The dyut and vṛt groups end here ("vṛt").
- Root 763 ghaṭa opens the ghaṭādi: its roots are ṣit and anudātteta. ghaṭ is mit:
ghaṭayati (SK 2568).
III.L. The ghaṭādi (mit) and phaṇādi groups — running example: vyath → vivyathe; phaṇ → pheṇatuḥ / paphaṇatuḥ; ghaṭ → ghaṭayati
- 2353 vyatho liṭi 7.4.68 — in liṭ, the abhyāsa of vyath takes saṃprasāraṇa. saṃprasāraṇam is continued from 2344.
- This is an exception to halādiḥ śeṣaḥ, which still removes the th:
vyath vyath e → vi vyath e → vivyathe. - The rest of the ghaṭādi, roots 765–821, are mit. Many of them are roots from other groups, restated in a particular sense to make them mit:
akṣañji / akṣāñji (SK 2762), hiḍayati, darayati / dārayati, śrapayati, madayati / mādayati. - The gaṇasūtras:
- ghaṭādayaḥ ṣitaḥ;
- ghaṭādayo mitaḥ;
- janījṝṣknasurañjo 'mantāś ca;
- jvalahvalahmalanamām anupasargād vā:
jvalayati / jvālayati, but prajvalayati; - glāsnāvanuvamāṃ ca;
- na kamyamicamām:
kāmayate, āmayati, cāmayati; - śamo darśane:
niśāmayati rūpam; - yamo 'pariveṣaṇe:
yamayati brāhmaṇān, but āyāmayati; - skhadir avaparibhyāṃ ca:
avaskhādayati. - 2354 phaṇāṃ ca saptānām 6.4.125 — the seven roots from phaṇ on optionally take e and lose the abhyāsa, before a kit liṭ and before thal with iṭ. The seven are phaṇ, rāj, bhrāj, bhrāś, bhlāś, syam and svan.
- phaṇ:
pheṇatuḥ, pheṇuḥ, pheṇitha / paphaṇatuḥ, paphaṇuḥ. phaṇ is mit: phaṇayati. - Some place the "vṛt" before phaṇ. The print and BM then still read phaṇayati, where phāṇayati is expected. This is open for Ajai.
- rāj:
rejatuḥ / rarājatuḥ. The long ā also takes e, by the force of the rule's being taught (vidhānasāmarthya). - bhrāj:
bhreje / babhrāje. - bhrāś:
bhrāśyate / bhrāśate (2321), bhreśe. - syam:
syematuḥ. svan: svenatuḥ. - The phaṇādi end with svan. dhvan is outside them:
dadhvanatuḥ. - The ghaṭādi close here with "vṛt".
- Roots 822–845: jvala
ajvālīt (2330); patḷ papāta, petatuḥ.
Part IV — SK 2355–2422: roots 846–1010 to the end of the bhvādi, and ṛter īyaṅ
Covers SK 2355–2422 (68 sūtras): all present. SK 2393 and 2396 have no kaumudī of their own (ours and the print): 2393 is glossed jointly under 2394, 2396 jointly under 2397. Both are placed below.
Contents (this part). SK order throughout, with no reordering. The sūtras stand inside the bhvādi dhātupāṭha, roots 846–1010: the end of the jvalādi (to kas, 860), the svaritets to guhū (861–896), the ubhayapadin and parasmaipadin vowel-final roots (897–947), the ṅit roots to ḍīṅ (948–968), and the anudāttet, svaritet and parasmaipadin roots up to the yajādi (969–1010).
- 2355–2359: pat, bhram, sah. apaptat, bhrematuḥ, soḍhā/parisoḍhā, paryaṣahata.
- 2360–2362: the śit substitutes, and sad/śad. sīdati, niṣasāda, śīyate.
- 2363–2365: loss of the penultimate, ū of guh, luk of ksa. cakhnatuḥ, gūhati, agūḍha.
- 2366–2369: bhṛñ. ṛ-final roots in lṛṭ, āśīrliṅ and ātmanepada luṅ.
- 2370–2378: ā-final roots from e/ai. dheṭ and glai: dadhau, dheyāt, adadhat/adhāt/adhāsīt, gleyāt.
- 2379–2385: ṛ- and u-final roots. Guṇa in liṭ and liṅ, and iṭ in thal and sic.
- 2386–2389: stem substitutes and i for ā. śṛṇoti, digye, adita.
- 2390–2392: ṝ-final tṝ. tarati, tarītā/taritā, atāriṣṭām.
- 2393–2395: san in its own sense. jugupsate, mīmāṃsate, bībhatsate.
- 2396–2399: n-loss before śap, and the ṣ of svañj and skand. svajate, pariṣasvaje, viṣkantā, pariṣkandati.
- 2400–2407: gam, sṛp, tap, dṛś. ch, iṭ, the augment am, guṇa before aṅ, no ksa.
- 2408–2417: saṃprasāraṇa in the yajādi. yaj, vap, vah, vas, veñ, vyeñ, hveñ.
- 2418–2421: aṅ/caṅ for hvā and śvi, and the close of the bhvādi.
- 2422: ṛter īyaṅ. ṛtīyate.
- Where the prakaraṇa ends. The bhvādi roots close inside 2421: "vṛt" there means the yajādi are finished, and "bhvādis tv ākṛtigaṇaḥ" adds culumpati and the like; the print reads "iti tiṅante bhvādayaḥ". Our text keeps SK 2422 (ṛter īyaṅ) in p44 and adds the closing "‖ iti tiṅantabhvādiprakaraṇam ‖". Open question: in the 1915 print, 2422 already opens the adādi, under the heading "tiṅante adādayaḥ 42". It ends "… ārtīt | 1011 ad bhakṣaṇe | dvau parasmaipadinau ‖", which ours places at the head of sk2423 (p45, adiprabhṛtibhyaḥ śapaḥ). See .work/sk-run/p45-notes.md; logged for Ajai.
IV.A. pat, bhram, sah: pum, optional e with abhyāsa-loss, o for a — running example: sah + tā → soḍhā → parisoḍhā
- 2355 pataḥ pum 7.4.19 — the augment pum (m-marked, so it goes after the last vowel) comes to pat when aṅ follows ("aṅi" carried forward from 2406). patḷ is ḷdit, so in luṅ cli → aṅ, giving
a-pat-a-t → apaptat. With pra-ni, ṇatva by ner gada… (SK 2285) gives praṇyapaptat. - Roots: kvathe (cakvātha), pathe, mathe (methatuḥ), and ṭuvama. vam begins with v, so there is no e and no abhyāsa-loss (vavamatuḥ). The Bhāgavṛtti's vematuḥ is "not seen in the Bhāṣya" (NSP fn.: asādhu).
- bhramu takes śyan optionally by vā bhrāśa… (SK 2321): bhramyati/bhramati.
- 2356 vā jṝbhramutrasām 6.4.124 — for jṝ, bhram and tras, e for the a and loss of the abhyāsa are optional before a kit liṭ, or thal with iṭ ("et" from SK 2471; "liṭi", "kiti", "thali ca seṭi" from SK 2260, 2363, 2261).
bhram + atus → bhrematuḥ / babhramatuḥ.- Next the anudāttet ṣaha: without iṭ (optional by SK 2340),
sah + tā. h → ḍh, t → dh, ṣṭutva dh → ḍh, and loss of the first ḍh give sa + ḍhā. - 2357 sahivahor od avarṇasya 6.3.112 — when ḍh has been lost ("ḍhralope" from SK 174), the a of sah and vah → o:
sa + ḍhā → soḍhā. vah gives uvoḍha and voḍhā (2409). - 2358 soḍhaḥ 8.3.115 — no ṣ for the s of sah in its form soḍh ("na" from SK 3168). parinivibhyaḥ… (SK 2275) is barred:
parisoḍhā. Print soḍhrūpasya; ours soḍhrarūpasya. - 2359 sivādīnāṃ vā 'ḍvyavāye 'pi 8.3.71 — after pari/ni/vi, the s of siv, sah, suṭ, stu and svañj → ṣ optionally, even across aṭ:
paryasahata / paryaṣahata. - Then ramu (reme, araṃsta; ātmanepada). Then the parasmaipadins up to kas, beginning with ṣadḷ.
IV.B. The śit substitutes, and sad/śad — running example: sad + śap + ti → sīdati; ni + sīdati → niṣīdati; liṭ niṣasāda
- 2360 pāghrādhmāsthāmnādāṇdṛśyartisartiśadasadāṃ pibajighradhamatiṣṭhamanayacchapaśyarcchadhauśīyasīdāḥ 7.3.78 — before a śit affix ("śiti" from SK 2320), pā ghrā dhmā sthā mnā dāṇ dṛś ṛ sṛ śad sad → piba jighra dhama tiṣṭha mana yaccha paśya ṛccha dhau śīya sīda, respectively.
sad + śap + ti → sīdati. Outside the śit domain the root stays: sasāda, sedatuḥ, seditha/sasattha, sattā, asadat (aṅ, ḷdit).- ṣ by sadir aprateḥ (SK 2271): niṣīdati, nyaṣīdat.
- The substitutes return later: pibati (no guṇa, since piba ends in a), jighrati, dhamati, tiṣṭhati, manati, praṇiyacchati (SK 2378); dhāvati (2382), ṛcchati (2382), paśyati (2403); śīyate (2362); gacchati uses ch instead (2400).
- 2361 sadeḥ parasya liṭi 8.3.118 — in liṭ, no ṣ for the s of sad that follows the abhyāsa. The abhyāsa's own s still takes ṣ by sthādiṣv abhyāsena… (SK 2277):
ni + sasāda → niṣasāda; niṣedatuḥ. - TB rejects the Vṛtti reading sadisvañjoḥ. svañj is added by vārttika under 2397.
- Next śadḷ: "śātana" names its familiar ṇic form, not its meaning.
- 2362 śadeḥ śitaḥ 1.3.60 — ātmanepada after śad when a śit is to follow (śidbhāvin; "ātmanepadam" from SK 2157):
śad + śap → śīya → śīyate. So it does not reach liṭ: śaśāda; also śattā, aśadat. - The rest of the jvalādi runs to kas: kruś (akrukṣat, ksa), kuc, budh, ruh (roḍhā, arukṣat), kas (akāsīt/akasīt); "vṛt".
- Then the svaritets up to guhū: añcu, ṭuyācṛ, budhir (abudhat/abodhīt; ciṇ by SK 2328 not here), ubundir, khanu.
- Print: añcati, yācñāyām, acatīt, mimedhe, bodhate (ours has slips).
IV.C. Loss of the penultimate, ū of guh, luk of ksa — running example: guh + śap + ti → gūhati; aguh + ksa + ta → aghukṣata / agūḍha
- 2363 gamahanajanakhanaghasāṃ lopaḥ kṅity anaṅi 6.4.98 — the penultimate of gam, han, jan, khan and ghas is lost before a vowel-initial kit/ṅit affix, but not before aṅ ("upadhāyāḥ" from 2364, "aci" from SK 271).
khan + atus → cakhnatuḥ. ye vibhāṣā (SK 2319) gives khāyāt/khanyāt.- The same rule gives jagmatuḥ (2400). Because of "anaṅi", agamat keeps its a (2401).
- Roots cīvṛ … guhū (879–896): avyayīt, spaśa, laṣyati/laṣati, and others.
- 2364 ūd upadhāyā gohaḥ 6.4.89 — the penultimate of guh (cited as goh, so only where guṇa is due, guṇahetu) → ū before a vowel-initial affix.
guh + śap + ti → gūhati / gūhate.- guhū is ūdit, so iṭ is optional: gūhitā (ū) vs. goḍhā (no ū, guṇa only); gūhiṣyati/ghokṣyati; agūhīt.
- Without iṭ, ksa comes:
aghukṣat. - 2365 lug vā duhadihalihaguhām ātmanepade dantye 7.3.73 — for duh, dih, lih and guh, ksa is optionally lost (luk) before a dental-initial taṅ ending.
aguh + ta → ḍh, dh, ṣṭutva, ḍh-loss, lengthening → agūḍha; otherwise aghukṣata.- ksa keeps its a before ātām, since ksasyāci (SK 2337) removes it: aghukṣātām.
- aguhvahi / aghukṣāvahi.
- Next the ubhayapadin vowel-final roots: śriñ (aśiśriyat, caṅ by SK 2312) and bhṛñ (babhāra, babhṛva, babhṛṣe, bhartā).
IV.D. bhṛñ: the ṛ-final root in lṛṭ, āśīrliṅ and luṅ — running example: bhṛ → bhariṣyati, bhriyāt, bhṛṣīṣṭa, abhṛta
- 2366 ṛddhanoḥ sye 7.2.70 — after an ṛ-final root and after han, sya takes iṭ (from SK 2184). Though bhṛ is aniṭ:
bhṛ + sya + ti → bhariṣyati. The same gives hvariṣyati (2379) and svariṣyati (2381, overriding the option of SK 2279). - 2367 riṅ śayagliṅkṣu 7.4.28 — ṛ → riṅ before śa, yak, or a y-initial ārdhadhātuka liṅ. riṅ is taught where rīṅ was available, so its i is not lengthened:
bhṛ + yāt → bhriyāt. Also sriyāt (print; ours sniyāt) and griyāt (2381, 2384). - 2368 uś ca 1.2.12 — after ṛ, a jhal-initial liṅ and a jhal-initial sic before taṅ are kit. BM's "jhalādī" is dual; the audit's must-fix corrects en.yml to this reading. Being kit, they take no guṇa:
bhṛ + sīṣṭa → bhṛṣīṣṭa, bhṛṣīyāstām. - The parasmaipada luṅ is not covered, so vṛddhi comes (SK 2297): abhārṣīt, abhārṣṭām, abhārṣuḥ.
- 2369 hrasvād aṅgāt 8.2.27 — after an aṅga ending in a short vowel, sic is lost before a jhal (sic supplied from the Bhāṣya; "lopaḥ" from SK 54, "jhali" from SK 2281).
abhṛ + s + ta → abhṛta, but abhṛṣātām (no jhal follows); abhariṣyat.- Then hṛñ (jahartha, jahriva), dhṛñ (adhṛta) and ṇīñ (ninayitha/ninetha). Then the parasmaipadin vowel-final roots, beginning with dheṭ (dhayati). Print nāśanam for ours nāsanam.
IV.E. ā-final roots from e/ai: dheṭ and glai — running example: dhe → dhā → dadhau, dadhatuḥ, dheyāt, adadhat / adhāt / adhāsīt
- 2370 ād eca upadeśe 'śiti 6.1.45 — a root ending in ec in upadeśa → ā, except before a śit: dhe → dhā (dhayati keeps e before śap). The same gives glai → glā.
- 2371 āta au ṇalaḥ 7.1.34 — after an ā-final root, ṇal → au:
dadhā + a → dadhau; jaglau. - 2372 āto lopa iṭi ca 6.4.64 — the ā is lost before a vowel-initial kit/ṅit ārdhadhātuka, and before iṭ. Being later, the lopa would precede doubling, but dvirvacane 'ci (SK 2243) blocks that. So after doubling: dadhatuḥ, dadhuḥ, dadhitha/dadhātha, dadhiva; dhātā.
- 2373 dādhā ghv adāp 1.1.20 — roots of the form dā and dhā are ghu, except dāp and daip. So dheṭ is ghu, feeding 2374–2376 and 2389.
- daip (924) is not ghu: dāyāt, adāsīt.
- ṣai is not the "so" taken in SK 2462 and 2376: sāyāt, asāsīt.
- pai's pā is secondary (lākṣaṇika): pāyāt, apāsīt.
- 2374 er liṅi 6.4.67 — for the ghu roots and mā, sthā, gā, pā, hā and sā ("ghumāsthā…" from SK 2462), the final → e before a kit ārdhadhātuka liṅ:
dhā + yāt → dheyāt, dheyāstām, dheyāsuḥ. Also peyāt, stheyāt, deyāt, geyāt (print; ours gaiyāt). - 2375 vibhāṣā dheṭśvyoḥ 3.1.49 — after dheṭ and śvi, cli → caṅ optionally in an agent luṅ. Doubling by caṅi (SK 2315):
adadhat, adadhatām. śvi gives aśiśviyat (2421). - 2376 vibhāṣā ghrādheṭśācchāsaḥ 2.4.78 — after ghrā, dheṭ, śā, chā and sā, luk of sic is optional before parasmaipada:
adhāt, adhātām, adhuḥ; aghrāt. - 2377 yamaramanamātāṃ sak ca 7.2.73 — yam, ram, nam and ā-final roots take the augment sak, and their sic takes iṭ, before parasmaipada. In the option where sic stays:
adhā + s + iṭ + s + īt → adhāsīt, adhāsiṣṭām, adhāsiṣuḥ. - Likewise aglāsīt, aghrāsīt, agāsīt, ayaṃsīt (2402) and anaṃsīt (2399).
- Then glai and mlai: glāyati, jaglau, jaglitha/jaglātha.
- 2378 vā 'nyasya saṃyogādeḥ 6.4.68 — for a conjunct-initial ā-final root other than those of SK 2462, e is optional before a kit ārdhadhātuka liṅ:
glāyāt / gleyāt; ghrāyāt/ghreyāt. - The ai-final roots follow (styai with ṣ: tiṣṭyāsati; kṣai; jai; ṣai; kai; gai; pai; ṣṭai; ṣṇai; daip), then pā, ghrā, dhmā, ṣṭhā (adhitaṣṭhau, adhiṣṭhātā), mnā and dāṇ with their 2360 substitutes. Then hvṛ.
IV.F. ṛ- and u-final roots: guṇa in liṭ and liṅ, and iṭ in thal and sic — running example: hvṛ → jahvāra, jahvaratuḥ, hvaryāt, ahvārṣīt; ṛ → āra, āritha, aryāt, ārṣīt
- 2379 ṛtaś ca saṃyogāder guṇaḥ 7.4.10 — an ṛ-final aṅga beginning with a conjunct takes guṇa before liṭ ("liṭi" from 2388). It is framed for kit endings, but being later it also displaces the vṛddhi of aco ñṇiti before ṇal. Then r follows (raparatva) and the penultimate takes vṛddhi.
hvṛ + ṇal → jahvar + a → jahvāra; jahvaratuḥ, jahvaruḥ, jahvartha; hvartā; hvariṣyati (2366).- 2380 guṇo 'rtisaṃyogādyoḥ 7.4.29 — guṇa (setting aside riṅ of 2367) for ṛ (arti) and for a conjunct-initial ṛ-final root before yak and a y-initial ārdhadhātuka liṅ:
hvṛ + yāt → hvaryāt. - ahvārṣīt/ahvārṣṭām. Print ahvārṣīt; ours ahvarṣīt.
- Then svṛ: veṭ in thal by svaratisūti… (SK 2279): sasvaritha/sasvartha.
- 2381 śryukaḥ kiti 7.2.11 — no iṭ before a kit (BM: g/kit) affix after śri and after a one-vowel uk-final aṅga. This prohibition would reach svṛ's va/ma, but by the krādi restriction (SK 2293) iṭ is obligatory in liṭ:
sasvariva, sasvarima. Then: - svariṣyati (2366, later rule); svaryāt; asvārīt/asvārṣīt (print asvārīt, asvāriṣṭām, asvārṣṭām).
- Root 934 is dvṛ (print, BM; ours hvṛ).
- sṛ is krādi, hence aniṭ in liṭ: sasartha, sasṛva; also sriyāt (2367) and asārṣīt.
- 2382 sartiśāstyartibhyaś ca 3.1.56 — aṅ for cli after sṛ, śās and ṛ. By association with śās (luptaśap), only the juhotyādi sṛ and ṛ are meant. So the bhvādi ones keep sic:
asārṣīt stands, and ārṣīt (2384). - sṛ in the sense of swift going → dhau (2360): dhāvati. Then ṛ: ṛcchati. Print gṛhyete; ours gṛhyate.
- 2383 ṛcchatyṝtām 7.4.11 — guṇa before liṭ for tudādi ṛcch, for the root ṛ, and for ṝ-final roots. Before ṇal, as at 2379: guṇa, then r, then vṛddhi of the penultimate:
ṛ + ṇal → ar + a → āra, āratuḥ, āruḥ. Also teratuḥ (2390). - 2384 iḍ atty-arti-vyayatīnām 7.2.66 — after ad, ṛ and vyeñ, thal always takes iṭ (the vibhāṣā of 2404 is not carried):
ṛ + thal → āritha. Also vivyayitha (2416). - The rest of ṛ: artā, ariṣyati, aryāt (2380), ārṣīt.
- gṛ is not covered: jagartha, jagriva, griyāt, agārṣīt.
- sru: asusruvat, with uvaṅ antaraṅga against laghūpadhaguṇa. Print antaraṅgatvāt.
- ṣu: suṣotha/suṣavitha, suṣuviva.
- 2385 stusudhūñbhyaḥ parasmaipadeṣu 7.2.72 — after stu, su and dhūñ, sic takes iṭ before parasmaipada:
asu + iṭ + s + īt → asāvīt (ṣu). - On the view that "su" means only sunoti, by association with the ñit stu and dhūñ: asauṣīt.
- Then śru.
IV.G. Stem substitutes and i for ā: śṛṇoti, digye, adita — running example: śru + śap + ti → śṛ + nu + ti → śṛṇoti
- 2386 śruvaḥ śṛ ca 3.1.74 — śru → śṛ, and śnu comes in the domain of śap, as an apavāda to śap ("ca" brings śnu from SK 2523). śnu is ṅit, so there is no guṇa of the root:
śṛṇoti, śṛṇutaḥ. - 2387 huśnuvoḥ sārvadhātuke 6.4.87 — the u (not after a conjunct) of hu and of a many-vowelled śnu-final aṅga → yaṇ before a vowel-initial sārvadhātuka, as an apavāda to uvaṅ.
śṛṇu + anti → śṛṇvanti.- Before v/m the u is optionally lost by lopaś cāsyānyatarasyāṃ mvoḥ (SK 2333, BM): śṛṇvaḥ/śṛṇuvaḥ, śṛṇmaḥ/śṛṇumaḥ; śṛṇu, śṛṇavāni, śrūyāt, aśrauṣīt.
- Then dhru, du, dru (adudruvat). BM reads duduviva for ours/print dudaviva, which is open. Then ji and jri (parājayate, SK 2685/589).
- Then the ṅit roots: ṣmiṅ (siṣmiyiḍhve/-dhve), guṅ, gāṅ (gāte, agāsta; not the gāṅ of SK 2461), kuṅ … ṅuṅ (ūve by vārṇād āṅgaṃ balīyaḥ), meṅ (praṇimayate), deṅ.
- 2388 dayater digi liṭi 7.4.9 — deṅ → digi before liṭ, and by the Vṛtti's iṣṭi the substitute blocks reduplication:
de + e → digye, not *didigye. TB: digi is specially taught, and "liṭi" is a parasaptamī. - 2389 sthāghvor ic ca 1.2.17 — for sthā and the ghu roots, i replaces the final and sic is kit before taṅ:
adā + s + ta → adi + s + ta → adita. sic is then lost by 2369 (BM). Also adithāḥ, adiṣi. - Then the ṅit roots śyaiṅ, pyaiṅ (papye), traiṅ, pūṅ, mūṅ and ḍīṅ. Print ḍiḍye.
IV.H. The ṝ-final tṝ: i, guṇa/vṛddhi, long iṭ — running example: tṝ → tarati, teratuḥ, tarītā / taritā, tīryāt, atāriṣṭām
- 2390 ṝta id dhātoḥ 7.1.100 — a root ending in ṝ → i (ir, with r following).
- Vārttika: guṇa and vṛddhi, by vipratiṣedha, set aside itva and utva. So
tṝ + śap + ti → tarati. - In liṭ, guṇa by 2383 and e by tṝphala… (SK 2301): teratuḥ, teruḥ.
- 2391 vṝto vā 7.2.38 — after vṛṅ/vṛñ and ṝ-final roots, iṭ is optionally long, but not in liṭ:
tarītā / taritā; teritha (liṭ). - tīryāt: ir by 2390, then lengthening by hali ca (SK 354). Print ṛdantāc cet-.
- 2392 sici ca parasmaipadeṣu 7.2.40 — no lengthening of that iṭ before a parasmaipada sic ("na" from SK 2529):
atāriṣṭām. - Then eight anudāttets: gupa, tija, māna, badha, …
IV.I. san in its own sense — running example: gup + san → jugupsate ("censures")
- 2393 guptijkidbhyaḥ san 3.1.5 — san after gup, tij and kit. There is no kaumudī: the print passes straight to 2394, which glosses both ("sūtradvayoktebhyaḥ san syāt").
- 2394 mānbadhadānśānbhyo dīrghaś cābhyāsasya 3.1.6 — san also after mān, badh, dān and śān, and the i of their abhyāsa (the ābhyāsa, i.e. the i of sanyataḥ, SK 2317) is long.
- Seven vārttika-sense statements (the Vṛttikāra's, BM/TB): gup in blame, tij in forbearance, kit in cure/restraint/removal/destruction/doubt, mān in the wish to know, badh in change of mind, dān in straightness, śān in sharpening.
- By sanādyantā dhātavaḥ (SK 2304) the san-form is a root.
- Print guper; ours gupoḥ.
- 2395 sanyaṅoḥ 6.1.9 — in what ends in san or yaṅ, the first single-vowelled part is doubled (the second in a vowel-initial root; SK 2175–2176 by adhikāra). It is a part-whole sixth case, not "before san", so pratīṣiṣati and aṭāṭyate come out right (BM, TB). Then the abhyāsa operations.
- These roots are anudāttet only in those senses (dān and śān are svaritet) and always san-final. Elsewhere they are curādi without anubandha.
- The anubandha has no scope on the bare root, so it gives taṅ after the san-form. This san is not taught under "dhātoḥ", so it is not ārdhadhātuka: no iṭ, no guṇa.
jugupsate (jugupsāṃcakre), titikṣate, mīmāṃsate.- badh: bh for b (bhaṣbhāva) and cartva →
bībhatsate (print; ours bābhatsate). - Also cikitsati, dīdāṃsate and śīśāṃsate (2407). Then rabh (ārabhate, rabdhā), ḍulabhaṣ and svañja.
IV.J. n-loss before śap, and the ṣ of svañj and skand — running example: svañj + śap + te → svajate; pari- → pariṣvajate; liṭ pariṣasvaje
- 2396 daṃśasañjasvañjāṃ śapi 6.4.25 — the n of daṃś, sañj and svañj is lost before śap ("nalopaḥ" from SK 2544). There is no kaumudī; the joint gloss is under 2397.
svañj + a + te → svajate. Also daśati (989) and sajati (987), both citing this sūtra (2403, 2407).- 2397 rañjeś ca 6.4.26 — likewise for rañj. The joint gloss is "eṣāṃ śapi nalopaḥ": svajate, pariṣvajate; rajati (999).
- Another grammar's rule: "for śranth, granth, dambh and svañj, liṭ is optionally kit". It is adopted from the Bhāṣya's examples debhatuḥ and sasvaje (ekadeśānumati). Print liṭaḥ; ours luṭaḥ, which is open.
- Vārttika svañjer upasaṃkhyānam (on 2361): no ṣ after the abhyāsa:
pariṣasvaje / pariṣasvañje; sasvajiṣe/sasvañjiṣe. - Also svaṅktā, svaṅkṣyate, svajeta.
- pratyaṣvaṅkta by prāk sitāt (SK 2276). After pari/ni/vi it is optional by 2359: paryaṣvaṅkta/paryasvaṅkta. That is why stu and svañj are named again in SK 2275.
- Then hada (ahatta), ñiṣvidā, and skandir. skandir forms: caskanditha/caskantha, skantā, skadyāt; askadat/askānsīt, where the print agrees with ours and BM reads askāntsīt.
- 2398 veḥ skander aniṣṭhāyām 8.3.73 — after vi, the s of skand → ṣ optionally ("vā" from 2359), except before a niṣṭhā. Being a paryudāsa, the rule applies only before a kṛt:
viṣkantā / viskantā; niṣṭhā viskannaḥ. - 2399 pareś ca 8.3.74 — after pari, the same option, and by yogavibhāga even before a niṣṭhā:
pariṣkandati / pariskandati; pariṣkaṇṇaḥ / pariskannaḥ. - With ṣ, the n → ṇ. The root–upasarga operation counts as antaraṅga: "first the root is joined with the upasarga, then with the means" (Bhāṣya). On the other view there is no ṇatva.
- Print pariskandati and parisk-; ours paraskandati and pirask-.
- Then yabha (yebhitha/yayabdha), ṇama (nemitha/nanantha, anaṃsīt), gamḷ and sṛpḷ.
IV.K. gam, sṛp, tap, dṛś: ch, iṭ, the augment am, guṇa before aṅ, no ksa — running example: dṛś → paśyati, dadarśitha / dadraṣṭha, draṣṭā, adarśat / adrākṣīt
- 2400 iṣugamiyamāṃ chaḥ 7.3.77 — iṣ, gam and yam → ch for the final before a śit ("śiti" from SK 2320):
gam + śap + ti → gacchati. - jagāma; jagmatuḥ and jagmuḥ (penultimate loss, 2363); jagamitha/jagantha; gantā.
- yam gives yacchati (2402).
- 2401 gamer iṭ parasmaipadeṣu 7.2.58 — an s-initial ārdhadhātuka after gam takes iṭ when there is no ātmanepada:
gam + sya + ti → gamiṣyati. - luṅ takes aṅ (ḷdit, SK 2343). "anaṅi" in 2363 keeps the penultimate:
agamat. - sṛp: sarpati, sasarpa.
- 2402 anudāttasya cardupadhasyānyatarasyām 6.1.59 — a root anudātta in upadeśa with ṛ as penultimate takes the augment am optionally before a jhal-initial non-kit affix (am etc. from 2405):
sṛp + tā → sraptā / sarptā; srapsyati/sarpsyati; asṛpat (aṅ). - kṛṣ follows at 2407: kraṣṭā/karṣṭā.
- Then yam (yacchati, yemitha/yayantha, ayaṃsīt with sak, 2377) and tap (taptā, atāpsīt).
- 2403 nisas tapatāv anāsevane 8.3.102 — the s of nis before tap → ṣ, except in the sense of repetition:
niṣṭapati. - Then tyaj (tatyaktha, atyākṣīt), ṣañj (sajati, 2396) and dṛśir (paśyati, 2360).
- 2404 vibhāṣā sṛjidṛśoḥ 7.2.65 — after sṛj and dṛś, thal takes iṭ optionally: dadarśitha / (without iṭ) dadraṣṭha.
- 2405 sṛjidṛśor jhaly amakiti 6.1.58 — sṛj and dṛś take the augment am before a jhal-initial non-kit affix.
dṛś + tha → dadraṣṭha; with iṭ the affix is not jhal-initial, so there is no am: dadarśitha.- Also draṣṭā and drakṣyati. dṛśyāt has no am, since the affix is not jhal-initial.
- dṛśir is irit, so aṅ is optional in luṅ.
- 2406 ṛdṛśo 'ṅi guṇaḥ 7.4.16 — guṇa for ṛ-final aṅgas and for dṛś before aṅ:
adṛś + a + t → adarśat. Its "aṅi" also runs into 2355 and 2421. - 2407 na dṛśaḥ 3.1.47 — after dṛś, cli does not become ksa (as SK 2336 would give), so sic stays:
adrākṣīt. - Then daṃś (daśati by 2396; dadaṃśitha/dadaṃṣṭha, adāṅkṣīt; fn. on the anunāsika-loss in "daśana") and kṛṣ (kraṣṭā/karṣṭā by 2402).
- Vārttika: for spṛś, mṛś, kṛṣ, tṛp and dṛp, cli → sic optionally. So akrākṣīt/akārkṣīt (sic, with and without am), and otherwise ksa (akṛkṣat).
- Then dah (dadagdha, adhākṣīt) and mih (meḍhā, amikṣat).
- kit: cikitsati (2393); ketayati in the sense of dwelling.
- dān and śān: svaritets up to vah; dīdāṃsate, śīśāṃsate (2394); dānayati elsewhere.
- Then pac (pecitha/papaktha), sac, bhaj (bhejatuḥ), rañj (rajati by 2397; arāṅkṣīt), śap, tviṣ (atvikṣat) and yaj.
IV.L. saṃprasāraṇa in the yajādi and grahādi — running example: yaj + ṇal → yayāj + a → iyāja; yaj + atus → ij + atus → ījatuḥ
BM's verse lists the yajādi as yaj, vap, vah, vas, veñ, vyeñ, hveñ, vad and śvi. vac and svap are named separately.
- 2408 liṭy abhyāsasyobhayeṣām 6.1.17 — in liṭ, the abhyāsa of both groups (vac-svap-yajādi of 2409 and grah etc. of 2412) takes saṃprasāraṇa (from SK 1003).
yayāj + a → y → i, with pūrvarūpa by saṃprasāraṇāc ca (SK 330) → iyāja.- In thal (not kit) only the abhyāsa changes: iyajitha/iyaṣṭha.
- 2409 vacisvapiyajādīnāṃ kiti 6.1.15 — vac, svap and the yajādi take saṃprasāraṇa before a kit. Being later, it applies before doubling, and doubling is then re-applied (punaḥprasaṅga):
yaj + atus → ij → ij-ij → i-ij → ījatuḥ, ījuḥ, īje; ijyāt (yāsuṭ is kit). - Also yaṣṭā, ayākṣīt/ayaṣṭa.
- vap: uvāpa, ūpe, upyāt, praṇyavāpsīt.
- vah: uvāha, uvahitha/uvoḍha (2357), ūhe, voḍhā, avākṣīt, avoḍha.
- vas: uvāsa.
- 2410 śāsivasighasīnāṃ ca 8.3.60 — the s of śās, vas and ghas after iṇ/ku → ṣ ("saḥ" from SK 335; headings SK 210–211):
vas + atus → ūs-atus → ūṣatuḥ, ūṣuḥ; uvasitha/uvastha; vastā. - By saḥ syārdhadhātuke (SK 2342): vatsyati, avātsīt, avāttām; uṣyāt.
- Then veñ: vayati/vayate.
- 2411 veño vayiḥ 2.4.41 — veñ → vay (the i is for pronunciation) optionally in liṭ (from 2.4.40, SK 2424). Before ṇal only the abhyāsa changes:
uvāya. - 2412 grahijyāvayivyadhivaṣṭivicativṛścatipṛcchatibhṛjjatīnāṃ ṅiti ca 6.1.16 — grah, jyā, vay, vyadh, vaś, vyac, vraśc, pracch and bhrasj take saṃprasāraṇa before a ṅit and (by "ca") a kit. The mention of vay is for clarity only, since vay is yajādi as veñ (BM, TB).
- In
vay + atus the last yaṇ, the y, is due first (na saṃprasāraṇe…, SK 363, as liṅga). - 2413 liṭi vayo yaḥ 6.1.38 — in liṭ, the y of vay does not take saṃprasāraṇa ("na" from SK 363). So the v does:
vay + atus → uy → ūyatuḥ, ūyuḥ. - 2414 vaś cāsyānyatarasyāṃ kiti 6.1.39 — in a kit liṭ, that y → v optionally:
ūvatuḥ / ūyatuḥ, ūvuḥ. - vay never meets tās, so iṭ in thal is obligatory: uvayitha.
- vay is ñit by sthānivadbhāva, so taṅ comes: ūye/ūve.
- 2415 veñaḥ 6.1.40 — where vay is not substituted, veñ takes no saṃprasāraṇa in liṭ:
vavau, vavatuḥ, vavuḥ, vavitha/vavātha, vave. Also vātā, ūyāt, vāsīṣṭa, avāsīt. - Then vyeñ: vyayati.
- 2416 na vyo liṭi 6.1.46 — vyeñ does not take the ā of 2370 in liṭ. So vṛddhi before ṇal: vyai.
- "ubhayeṣām" in 2408 makes the abhyāsa's saṃprasāraṇa a niyama, which sets aside the later halādiḥ śeṣaḥ (BM). So the y of the abhyāsa → i, not the v:
vivyāya, vivyatuḥ, vivyuḥ. - vivyayitha has iṭ by 2384. vivyāya/vivyaya is the uttama singular (print vivyaya; ours vivyaca). Also vivye.
- Then vyātā, vīyāt, vyāsīṣṭa, avyāsīt/avyāsta. Then hveñ.
- 2417 abhyastasya ca 6.1.33 — hveñ takes saṃprasāraṇa when it is going to become abhyasta, and then doubles. "hvaḥ saṃprasāraṇam" (6.1.32, SK 2586) is carried forward, per BM (under sk.2586.b1). TB calls it a split of one sūtra (yogavibhāga).
hve → hu → ju-hu + a → juhāva, juhuvatuḥ, juhuvuḥ; juhotha/juhavitha, juhuve; hvātā, hūyāt, hvāsīṣṭa.
IV.M. aṅ/caṅ for hvā and śvi, and the close of the bhvādi — running example: hvā → ahvat / ahvata / ahvāsta; śvi → aśvat / aśiśviyat / aśvayīt
- 2418 lipisicihvaś ca 3.1.53 — cli → aṅ after lip, sic and hvā (aṅ from SK 2438). It is obligatory in parasmaipada (BM).
- 2419 ātmanepadeṣv anyatarasyām 3.1.54 — before ātmanepada the aṅ of 2418 is optional.
- Before aṅ the ā of hvā is lost by āto lopa… (2372; ours and the print both misprint "ato lopaḥ"):
ahvā + a + t → ahvat, ahvatām, ahvan. - Ātmanepada:
ahvata (with aṅ; print, where ours repeats ahvat) / ahvāsta (without). - Then vad: accha vadati; uvāda, ūdatuḥ (2409), uvaditha, udyāt, avādīt (SK 2267). Then ṭuośvi: śvayati.
- 2420 vibhāṣā śveḥ 6.1.30 — śvi takes saṃprasāraṇa optionally in liṭ and before yaṅ (from SK 2327):
śuśāva, śuśuvatuḥ. - Vārttika: for śvi in liṭ the abhyāsa-conditioned saṃprasāraṇa (2408) is barred. So, without the option:
śiśvāya, śiśviyatuḥ. - Also śvayitā, śvayet and śūyāt. In luṅ, aṅ is optional by jṝstambhu… (SK 2291).
- Print liṭy abhyāsasya; ours liṭyā-.
- 2421 śvayater aḥ 7.4.18 — the final i of śvi → a before aṅ ("aṅi" from 2406). Then pararūpa, not ato lopaḥ:
a-śva-a-t → aśvat, aśvatām, aśvan. - With caṅ (2375) and iyaṅ:
aśiśviyat. - With neither, hmyanta… (SK 2299) bars vṛddhi:
aśvayīt. - Close: "vṛt": the yajādi are finished. bhvādi is an ākṛtigaṇa, hence culumpati. "iti tiṅante bhvādayaḥ".
IV.N. ṛter īyaṅ: a sautra root made into a derived root — running example: ṛt + īyaṅ → ṛtīya → ṛtīyate
- 2422 ṛter īyaṅ 3.1.29 — after the sautra root ṛt, īyaṅ comes in its own sense (disgust; some add pity).
- The root is t-final, not i-final (BM, TB). TB calls the argument from the long ī cintya.
- By SK 2304 ṛtīya is a root:
ṛtīyate, ṛtīyāṃcakre. - When an ārdhadhātuka is intended, īyaṅ is optional by āyādaya ārdhadhātuke vā (SK 2305). Without it, parasmaipada comes by śeṣāt kartari (SK 2159; ours and the print misnumber it 2259):
ānarta, artiṣyati, ārtīt. - Ours closes "‖ iti tiṅantabhvādiprakaraṇam ‖". In the 1915 print this sūtra already opens the adādi (see "Where the prakaraṇa ends").